THE HILL
 

Israel advocacy group faxing lawmakers about J Street conference concerns

By Bridget Johnson - 10/16/09 02:53 PM ET

An Israel advocacy group has been faxing out letters since Friday morning to the 160 lawmakers reportedly committed to attending the honorary dinner for the J Street "Driving Change, Securing Peace" conference in Washington Oct. 25-28.

The statement from StandWithUs is prefaced by a cover letter to each lawmaker, noting the lamaker's reported attendance and expressing concern about J Street's positions. The group does not specifically ask the lawmakers to not attend the J Street conference, but includes an attached statement and offers to answer questions about issues concerned with J Street.

J Street sent out an e-mail to supporters blaming "neoconservatives and their Swift Boat tactics" for five members of Congress pulling out of the conference host committee. The J Street e-mail blamed The Weekly Standard for orchestrating a phone campaign to members' offices, using "thuggish smear tactics" to dissuade members' participation. The Weekly Standard also reported this afternoon that Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) asked that her name be removed from the host committee list, saying that she didn't know her name was on the list to begin with.

The StandWithUs letters began arriving at members' offices this morning and have been continuing to go out throughout the day. The list of recipients includes the lawmakers who have reportedly pulled out. The group also plans on taking out one or more ads in local newspapers.

L.A.-based StandWithUs bills itself as a "an international, non-profit Israel education organization that ensures that Israel's side of the story is told on campuses and communities." The group, founded in 2001, has offices in the U.K. and Israel as well as the U.S.

The full text of the statement sent to lawmakers is after the jump:


StandWithUs has concerns about "J Street," a new organization and lobby whose goal is to change U.S. policies on Israel. Though J Street claims to be "pro-Israel" and "pro-peace" and to represent mainstream Jewish opinion, we are troubled because their positions seem to undermine Israel and its search for peace with security. Their views may also contribute to anti-Israel biases and misinformation.

Among our concerns are the following:

We are concerned because J Street echoes many of the charges in Walt and Mearsheimer's The Israel Lobby, and denigrates mainstream Jewish organizations across the political spectrum.

We are concerned about many of J Street's funders and advisors who have opposed Israel or have ties with Arab governments that have been consistently hostile to Israel. They include one board member who donated $10,000 and is on the National American Iranian Council, widely viewed as the unofficial lobby in America for the current Iranian regime. [1] Others include Zahi Khouri, a wealthy Palestinian businessman, who considers AIPAC and Netanyahu "enemies of peace" [2] Another J Street donor is a board member of Human Rights Watch, an organization that targets Israel [3] for unfair criticism, and was recently exposed because its "military expert" was obsessed with Nazi memorabilia, and because it solicited funds from the Saudi government, enticing them by promising to continue its biased investigations of Israel. J Street advisor Judith Barnett worked for the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Trade, and became a registered agent for Saudi Arabia. [4]

We are concerned because J Street draws a moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas. During Israel's recent war against Hamas, J Street said it could not identify "who was right or who was wrong," proclaiming that "we recognize that neither Israelis nor Palestinians have a monopoly on right and wrong." [5] We are deeply disturbed that J Street would equate the moral principles of Israel and Hamas, whose founding document calls for the murder of Jews and the destruction of Israel, and includes sections that echo The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

We are most concerned because J Street frequently endorses anti-Israel, anti-Jewish narratives. J Street claimed that Israel's response in the war against Hamas was "disproportionate;" accepted the discredited claims of the UN Goldstone report on Israel's conduct during the Hamas war; [6] launched letter writing campaigns to support a "60 Minutes" show demonizing Israeli settlers; [7] supported the staging of "7 Jewish Children," a play with such strong anti-Semitic messages that the BBC wouldn't air it, [8] and praised Jimmy Carter whose biased views have been so damaging to Israel. [9]

We are concerned because J Street lays equal blame on Israel and the Palestinians for the ongoing conflict, ignoring the long history of Palestinian rejectionism, the extremism of Palestinian organizations like Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Fatah-funded Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, and the unfortunate results of Israel's concessions for peace, such as the withdrawal from Gaza in 2005. We are disturbed when we read statements blaming both sides equally for the failure of past peace efforts, such as, "It is J Street's position that the parties themselves have proven incapable of reaching a resolution to the conflict." [10]

We are concerned because J Street frequently opposes the positions of the Israeli government and its electorate, and urges America to oppose center piece Israeli policies that have wide public support in Israel and the U.S. J Street opposed Israel's war against Hamas, supported the U.S. administration's call for a settlement freeze without comparable demands put on the Palestinians, rejects stronger sanctions against Iran, and calls for the U.S. and Israel to negotiate with Hamas. J Street seems to belittle or ignore official Israeli policy and the realities on the ground in the region.

We are also troubled that many Israeli J Street members are affiliated with Israeli political parties that were soundly defeated and marginalized in recent elections, and who seem to be trying to influence the American public and government to adopt their rejected platforms.

We are troubled that J Street claims to represent the silent mainstream of American Jewish opinion even though the polls that J Street conducted to prove the popularity of its positions were exposed as unreliable because biased questions forced the responses that J Street sought. [11] Other polls of Jewish American opinion produced substantially different results.

StandWithUs shares the deep concerns of Rabbi Eric Yoffie, President of the Union for Reform Judaism, who broke with J Street because of its position on Israel's war against Hamas. He wrote that J Street's views are "deeply distressing because they are morally deficient, profoundly out of touch with Jewish sentiment and also appallingly naïve." [12]

We are all committed to breaking the impasse on the road to peace in the Middle East, but we should be concerned about a group that misrepresents itself to well-meaning people by falsely claiming that it reflects mainstream American Jewish opinion, and while promoting policies and views that threaten to harm Israel and undermine the arduous efforts for establishing an enduring peace.

[1] http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2009/08/exposing -j-street-fraud-why-is-pro.html

[2] Lenny Ben-David, "Peeling Off J-Street's Invisibility Cloak: What Today's NY Times Magazine Won't Tell You, Pajamas Media, Sept. 13, 2009 at http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/peeling-off-j- streets-invisibility-cloak-what-todays-ny-times- magazine-wont-tell-you/

[3] http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/peeling-off-j- streets-invisibility-cloak-what-todays-ny-times- magazine-wont-tell-you/ and NGO Monitor at ttp://www.ngo- monitor.org/article/human_rights_watch_hrw_

[4] http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/peeling-off-j- streets-invisibility-cloak-what-todays-ny-times- magazine-wont-tell-you/

[5] http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? cid=1244371055245&pagename=JPArticle% 2FShowFull and http://www.jstreet.org/page/rep-marcy- kaptur-d-oh-statement-violence-gaza

[6] http://www.jstreet.org/blog/ , Sept. 21, 2009

[7] http://jstreet.org/campaigns/archived Jan. 29, 2009

[8] http://theaterjblogs.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/j- street-letter-of-support-on-discussing-7jc/

[9] http://www.campusprogress.org/asktheexpert/293 4/redefining-pro-israel

[10] http://jstreet.org/page/israel-palestine#

[11] http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index. php/pollak/75641

[12] http://www.forward.com/articles/14847/


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/63523-israel-advocacy-group-faxing-lawmakers-about-j-street-conference-concerns

Comments (6)

American young people will continue to die in the Middle East forever and forever due to these Stand With Us thugs.Their hope is the status quo, death and destruction.Pray for the peacemakers. Only Israelis can stop the carnage. They care nothing of our kids.BY tropicgirl on 10/16/2009 at 16:58
At least StandWithUS dares to expose the leftist anti-Israel J Street gang. With friends lijke them, who needs enemies. J Street and its ilk were silent as the missiles and rockets were flying in from Gaza and landing in Israeli border towns. Only after 8000 rockets had hit did Israel finally stop it. Of course, then J Street sprang into action by condemning Israel. Sorry TROPICGIRL, your argument just doesn't wash.BY Thurston Howell III on 10/16/2009 at 19:52
Perhaps J-Street could provide names of the cowards who pulled out of their dinner based on pressure from a foreign organization. We need names because they should be publicly shamed out of office for pulling a stunt like that.BY Chris Baker on 10/16/2009 at 21:18
It is an absolute "shanda" (disgrace) that these JEWISH anti-semites are given a public forum. I wonder how many of them sat at a grandparent's or parent's knee to bear witness to the Holocaust and record this oral history to be passed on for generations. Not many, I believe, as J street is mainly comprised of thirty-something little s***ts who have their little Zen Passover Seders and roast a pig as the main dish. As Barbara Lipstadt said, to argue with them is to give them creedence. IGNORE THEM. Do not engage them, but fight them! At every turn. Beware of statements from Tropic Girl and her ilk…blantant anti-semites who probably still belive we make Matzoh from the blood of Gentile children. NOTHING HAS CHANGED. We are still the most hated people on the planet. This will NEVER change as long as people like Tropic Girl walk the earth. Ask yourselves: Why does J street take this poisition? To what end? The safety of Jews or to line their own "pisher" pockets? Jew against Jew. We dont hve to worry about Iran, we will destroy ourselves. NEVER AGAINSay it out loud: NEVER AGAINShabbat Shalom.BY Marc, a NYC Jew on 10/16/2009 at 22:58
Marc, '…We are still the most hated people on the planet…'Where does that conclusion come from? I thought it was the USA or specifically; the actions of the US Government.This is not a competition in my mind, but one could reason there are Zionist who want to think that to feed their paranoia that has been inculcated constantly all their lives, producing mass mental illness that prevents objective analysis and feeds rationalization s for the psychic numbing exhibited in a poll by Haaretz stating that 94% of the Israeli Jews supported the mass murder of Palestinians in Gaza.Please tell, why is it that you think or subscribe to the claim that the Jews are the most hated people in the world? Does that not feed into fear, begetting hatred, begetting aggression under the pretext of self-defense, blinding one to objectivity even when the wanton war crimes of Israel are televised worldwide?You can blame other people, as you do J Street, but you can't see the wickedness in Zionism as a genocidal movement against the Arabs based on a bogus biblical claim of a deed from Yahweh that is a farce and fiction, and only encourages the insanity J Street is laboring to heal.BY Bill Mitchell on 10/17/2009 at 06:27
When will we (Jews) get our heads out of our asses and stop supporting the seeds of our own destruction.These leftist Jstreet thugs need to be exposed for what they are. A demented fringe.BY Ari on 11/18/2009 at 11:15

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.