THE HILL
 

White House won’t rule out budget reconciliation rules on healthcare

By Sam Youngman - 11/09/09 03:50 PM ET

The Senate could still use budget rules to pass healthcare without 60 votes, the White House indicated Monday.

President Barack Obama is hopeful that the Senate will pass a healthcare bill with 60 votes, but White House press secretary Robert Gibbs held out the possibility that budget reconciliation rules could still be used.

He said Senate leaders and the White House would turn to those rules, which would prevent the Senate from needing to secure 60 votes for procedural steps, only if they are not making progress.

As long as “we continue to make progress, then we don't see any need to change the process,” Gibbs said.

Gibbs was then asked what the White House would do if progress is halted in the Senate.

“Then we'll look at alternatives,” Gibbs said.

The Democrats will have to pull all 58 of their members along with the two independents who caucus with the party to win 60 votes on procedure, assuming Republicans vote against them.

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) has warned he will vote against legislation that includes a public health insurance option.

Gibbs said the president was thrilled by Saturday's House passage of the bill despite the narrow margin, but he acknowledged that with Senate consideration and conference committee still looming “we have miles to go before we sleep.”




Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/67011-white-house-wont-rule-out-reconciliation-rules-on-healthcare

Comments (72)

the reason obama wants the bill passes asap is because if it waits till after the holidays, there will be lots of townhalls and he cant afford for anyone to be swayed against the biill,BY cargo65 on 11/09/2009 at 16:47
To: CARGO65Your statement makes no sense and it reeks of someone with the political mind of a two-year-old.BY TheBiz on 11/09/2009 at 17:18
I'm not sure that there is any difference between Brago the ex-governor if Illinois who is under criminal indictment for asking for personal gain in appointing obamas replacement and what obama and pelosi did in this illegal unconstitutiona l bill. The only thing obama-pelosi used taxpayers money as a bride and threats. This adminstration and Congress will do down in history as having the most criminals convicted either before or after they leave office for their illegal activities. Shame on you obama, pelosi, reid, rangal, kerry, dodd, frank, waters. Keep the note book open because there will be more.BY jake2 on 11/09/2009 at 18:28
Gibby hasn't got the gonadds for reconciliation, there would be a lot more new faces in the big house.BY rick on 11/09/2009 at 19:15
They need to use reconciliation. It's a given that every republican in the senate will join a filabuster. A few dems will probably join them, including that lying turncoat Lieberman. Reid needs to use the whip hand here, and let it be known that he is going to use reconciliation if needed.BY Richard on 11/09/2009 at 20:27
Wouldn't a traditional filibuster forced upon the minority by the Majority Leader just before the winter recess, complete with round the clock sessions, continuous minority speeches and a ready quorum of majority party senators, be better then letting the minority return to overheated town hall meetings? It could continue until the Senate's scheduled reconvention in January at which time a weary nation would welcome the use of “budget reconciliation rules” to pass reform?BY Kevin Marley on 11/09/2009 at 22:09
This is an example of Chicago thug politics at its worst: Either you do it my way, or I will break the rules and force this down your throats. Well, We the People will NOT be bullied by political cronies from corrupt Chicago. Drop the public option, drop the plans to cut $500 billion from senior care, drop the plans to give illegal aliens yet another taxpayer-funded benefit — or your plans for health "reform" will fail.BY JohnQCitizen on 11/09/2009 at 22:13
With 52% of Americans opposing this health care bill, passing it in this manner will surely limit Obama's term in office along with the Congressmen who vote for this. This is not health care reform the people wanted, this is reduced care with much higher cost for all, which we can not afford. The states will be burdened with added fees which they will in turn pass on to taxpayers.BY bailedout on 11/09/2009 at 22:37
Oh, Jakey… Jakey Jakey Jakey…Haven't the Republicans learned not to throw stones? The difference between the parties is clear:Yes, while both parties suffer from corruption, and amply, Republicans circled the wagons AROUND Ney Delay Foley Ensign the Alaskan Bearded Brothers. Democrats? Democrats took Jefferson to the woodshed to be formally indigted. Are they MUCH better? Heck no. Especially not with Murtha sitting on his lofty perch. Power corrupts as power corrupts…But I wouldn't quite go callin' on Republicans as anything but the Hypocritical Moral Majority Party quite yet.BY Honest Abe on 11/10/2009 at 01:42
Yeah. JohnQ. Sure.My way or the highway. That's how it went down. That's what ALL the weeks and months of debate and committee hearings and amendments grindhouse legislating that went on meant. That's what that whole "Gang of 6" was about, working through the grueling hours trying to find a way to find common cause."Chicago Politics". Christ. You're really really sad, man. That's of the line of thought that, while Democrats and Republicans are at the leglislative disco, and the Dems walk out from the chairs by their wall all the way out past the middle of the dancefloor, TRYING to get the GOP to shake a tailfeather and find a common groove, the GOP are just sitting there locked in place, glued with their backs to the wall, an angry scowl on their face and arms folded tersely across their collective chest saying NO! NO NO NO! I WILL NOT negotiate in good faith and actually do anything to attempt to legislate. NO! I run the disco or I won't do a damned thing!Johnny Q? Is that really where you find fault in the Dem's attempts at bipartisanship?BY Honest Abe on 11/10/2009 at 01:46

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.