THE HILL
 

Democrat’s win in N.Y. plays spoiler for GOP

By Aaron Blake - 11/04/09 12:27 AM ET

Democrat Bill Owens has won the special election in New York’s 23rd district, giving Democrats a big House takeover in a race that garnered plenty of national attention.

The Associated Press, MSNBC and Fox News have called the race for Owens, and Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman has reportedly conceded.

Owens had 49 percent of the vote with about 86 percent of precincts reporting. Hoffman trailed at 45 percent, while withdrawn Republican nominee Dede Scozzafava had 5 percent.

Hoffman appeared to have the momentum going into Election Day in the upstate district, but the de facto Republican nominee appeared to succumb to the Democratic turnout machine and a late visit from Vice President Joe Biden.

The race was the one missing piece for the Republicans nationally Tuesday, with the party taking a pair of governor’s seats from Democrats earlier in the night in Virginia and in a tight race in New Jersey.

With the win in New York, Democrats grew their House majority to 257 votes, while Republicans, who held the seat previously, fell to 176.

The seat became vacant when Rep. John McHugh (R-N.Y.) was confirmed as Obama’s Army Secretary.

The race burst onto the national scene over the last few days, after a conservative backlash pushed the liberal Republican Scozzafava from the race.

Hoffman and Owens polled close before Scozzafava’s exit, and Hoffman took leads in a pair of polls afterward. But there was plenty of unpredictability heading into the voting Tuesday, and neither side was too confident about their prospects.

Scozzafava crossed parties to support Owens – a move lamented by Republicans who labeled her a turncoat.

Democrats pointed to the events as proof that conservatives are unhappy with the direction of the national GOP. Conservative candidates are challenging establishment Republicans in many top races around the country – mostly as primary challengers, but some as third-party
candidates like Hoffman.

Republicans pointed to Hoffman’s ascendance as proof that conservative principles are popular. They note that the district went 52 percent for President Barack Obama in 2008.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) spent more than $1 million on the race, while the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spent most of its $900,000 opposing Owens, even though the expenditures occurred before Scozzafava’s exit.

Third party groups led by the Club for Growth played heavily for Hoffman. The Club’s spending rivaled the major party committees for much of the race.

As a measure of the coming 2010 environment, that race represents something of an anomaly, with variables that won’t be repeated in most races across the country. The winners will seize on the results as evidence of some momentum.

Republicans still had positive signs Tuesday, winning the governorships of Virginia and New Jersey.

The other big race Tuesday night was in New Jersey, where Gov. Jon Corzine (D) lost a second term in a close race with Republican former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie. In that race, at least, an independent who threatened Christie saw his vote share drop on Election Day.

Republicans had also struggled in the last four major special congressional elections, dropping three in 2008 before major losses in the general election. They also lost another battleground district in upstate New York early this year.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/66237-democrats-win-in-ny-plays-spoiler-for-gop

Comments (10)

This is really the real news of the day. Governor races are great, but the last time I checked, they don't vote for important national legislation.Republicans, please moderate your party.BY Mike on 11/04/2009 at 00:49
Nice try Mike, but you're wrong.N.Y. was a quirky race that the GOP will win back soon.Re VA and NJ: the lesson and big news from tonight is that Obama and the Democrats lurched too far to the left, and they had better back off their radical agenda. Even Obama won't be able to save the Blue Dogs if they vote for govt health care.BY Dave, Missouri on 11/04/2009 at 01:06
wrong take Dave - Gubernational elections really mean little outside of state politics (i.e. Sarah Palin), they are essentially "local" elections that have no national bearing…feel free to post the next time you hear of the Governers of NJ or VA or any Governer for that matter affecting the National political discussion in any way - it just does not happen. If you want to talk about a "lurch" as you put it, you would look at the fact that the seat in NY would have been retained by a Republican, a moderate Republican, but nonetheless a Republican had Scozzafava run without Hoffman's interference - she prob would have won 51-49… But as it stands, the Democratic Party gains yet another vote on the national level for health care Dem policy - nothing more than a classic example of cutting off your nose to despite your face…I encourage this behavior in the 2010 elections and please follow Glen Becks advice of voting for "Conservatives" over "Republicans" in all upcoming elections - Dave, Missouri = FAILBY Erik Moore on 11/04/2009 at 02:03
Sarah, you lost again!!!!!BY steve soule on 11/04/2009 at 02:05
You sound a little nervous Erik, as evidenced by your sophomoric analysis. Tonight was a referendum on Barack Obama and what remains of his diminishing clout, which even the mainstream media has been forced to admit. Now go back to your brainwashing at the Daily Koss while the taxpayers pay for you to ride in the wagon.BY Dave Missouri on 11/04/2009 at 02:13
Actually Dave your the nervous and uneducated individual. Erik is correct that local elections have no national bearing, so I suggest that you educate yourself before you make any more posts. So now you agree with MSM? Thats funny!BY Ruby Soto on 11/04/2009 at 03:40
Despite being a supporter of Democrats I find it very difficult to support Wall Street bank executives like Corzine or Deeds (Deeds had no policy platform of his own to be honest) but I feel so good that teabagger nutjobs put all their bets on NY-23 and lost big time.BY Sid on 11/04/2009 at 03:42
Being a Dem, I love the notion of the elephants losing a House seat they've held since the Grant administration, yet in a lot of ways I think it would have been better strategically for the Dems if Owens had lost and Hoffman had won. Then the teabaggers would have really revved up their attacks on moderate elephants and the resulting bloodbath would have been greatly beneficial to the Dems. As it is, the way NY 23 played out should give pause to the teabag set, but that makes the mindbending assumption that they actually think.BY John A on 11/04/2009 at 10:19
So you have the NRCC spending $1M, the Club for Growth about the same (that's now a combined doubling of what the Dems spent on the race), PLUS free advertising on Faux Propaganda with Glen Beck and Sean Hannity, PLUS the tea party crowd, PLUS Sarah Palin, PLUS free advertising in the MSM… And the Conservative STILL lost solidly. WOW. The Right Wing GOP brand is worse than dog food.BY Ethan on 11/04/2009 at 12:10
Also, under the radar, the Dems picked up a progressive, PRO-Public Option vote by winning the CA-10 race. They replaced an ANTI-PO Blue Dog (Ellen Tauscher) with a pro-HCR, pro-PO progressive and he won, again, solidly. Great news for the Dems.BY Ethan on 11/04/2009 at 12:12

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.