THE HILL
 

Dems: CIA may have misled Congress five times since 2001

By Jared Allen - 10/27/09 03:22 PM ET

The CIA may have misled Congress at least five times since 2001, two Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee said Tuesday.


Intelligence subcommittee Chairwomen Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) and Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) are leading an ongoing investigation into what they described as a practice of incomplete and often misleading intelligence briefings, which arose in the wake of CIA Director Leon Panetta’s June 24 admission that intelligence officials failed to notify Congress about a top-secret program to assassinate al Qaeda leaders.

“That is an example of a failure to notify but we think a symptom of a larger disease,” Schakowsky said on Tuesday.

“There have been many instances where we’ve come to a committee hearing, after having read in the paper of something that should have been notified to us, where it’s followed up my mea culpas by the intelligence community,” Schakowsky said. “And examples where the committee actually has been lied to.

“You can understand that the committee has felt very frustrated that the executive branch has not notified us of intelligence activity,” she said. “We’re in the process of reviewing several instances where the executive branch may have violated the [notification] requirements that are in the National Security Act.”

One of the instances being closely examined by the two Democrats is the September 2002 briefing on enhanced interrogation techniques that became the basis for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) claim that the CIA lied to her. Findings on this point could bolster Pelosi’s case.

The Speaker came under fire after she said at a testy press conference in May that the CIA had lied to her and other members during a 2002 briefing about its use of waterboarding on detainees. Pelosi was the ranking member of the Intelligence panel at the time.

“We were told explicitly that waterboarding was not being used,” she said at the May press conference. “They [the CIA] misled us all the time.”

Republicans demanded proof from Pelosi of CIA lies, and the Speaker was also criticized for not objecting to waterboarding when she first learned about it.

Nadeam Elshami, a spokesman for the Pelosi, on Tuesday said that the Speaker’s May statement speaks for itself.

In June, CIA Director Leon Panetta alerted the House Intelligence Committee about a top-secret program to assassinate top al Qaeda operatives that previously had not been disclosed to Congress. Later reports indicated that former Vice President Dick Cheney had ordered the CIA not to notify Congress of the program.

Panetta’s revelation appeared to bolster Pelosi’s statement from May, and Schakowsky and Eshoo identified “Director Panetta’s June 24 notification” as one of the five instances linked to a complete communication breakdown between the intelligence community and Congress.

“It is the policy of the Central Intelligence Agency to be clear and candid with the United States Congress,” CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said in response to a request for comment. “Director Panetta has made a relationship of trust, confidence and respect a top priority.”

At least one of the CIA’s obfuscations was already known. A 2008 CIA Inspector General’s report determined that the agency withheld information from Congress relating to the shooting down of a plane carrying missionaries over Peru in 2001.

In addition, the CIA may have failed to properly notify Congress about the 2005 destruction of videotapes recording the interrogation of al Qaeda operatives by intelligence officials, Eshoo and Schakowsky said.

This story was updated at 7:13 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/65027-pelosi-claim-that-cia-lied-validated-by-intel-panel

Comments (137)

Why doesn't the CIA just go on strike? It would be funny if they all joined in a protest outside the capital. Pelosi, is a commie rat.BY kevtop351 on 10/27/2009 at 16:56
So what if there is a "policy" to be "clear and candid" with Congress? Lying to Congress is a felony, irrespective of whether it also breaks a "policy."BY PAN on 10/27/2009 at 16:58
This is so weak it is a confession of the weakness of Pelosi's position. Those doing the 'investigation' are, to be charitable, two hens guarding the house hen. We all know Pelosi knew about the water boarding and she told a whopper. Vote all three out of office.BY graham on 10/27/2009 at 16:58
Democrats must protect the Queen Bee!!BY Boston on 10/27/2009 at 17:00
Schakowsky? She's as much as a neo-Marxist as Pelosi is. Sounds like Pelosi stacked the deck with her own investigation. It is so nice to to hear that the CIA is now also an Enemy of the State. That to go along with insurance companies, banks, Limbaugh, Fox News, doctors, the Chamber of Commerce, and pretty much any one else that disagrees with the likes of Pelosi and Obama.BY CJ on 10/27/2009 at 17:03
Now why would Nancy Pelosi want THIS brought up again? All the wishy washy logic claims of he said/she said "complete communication breakdown " excuses couldn not possibly do anyone any good. All said and done lets call it an embarassing chapter and just let it go. I think the CIA and the Speaker would both agree.BY POTR on 10/27/2009 at 17:04
Maybe Pelosi could mother the terrorists and make nice to get them to tell where and when they were planning to bomb major US cities. Yea,… that's the ticket… make nice… NOTBY Ron on 10/27/2009 at 17:07
"Boston"… absolutely correct. The swarms create diversions, the plastic faced maven of duplicity continues to spew her pre-recorded Marxist rhetoric and the country watches the reconstruction of what once was a beautiful dream. My poor Romanian grandparents escaped fire, hell and damnation to dip from the Great American well of hope. Romania vs. the USA in 20 years or less.. Will there be a difference?BY Barb T. on 10/27/2009 at 17:09
Once again, when the left can't accomlish what they want they revert back to their diversoin tactics. Nancy Pelosi let's get the economy and people back working, pass health care reform without burdening the country with an outrageous deficit and take care of of our men and women serving in the armed forces. Stop moving off target and showing the inexperience that this President has by always complaining about the past when you can't push your agenda through.BY fran on 10/27/2009 at 17:15
The problem is that the law in no longer enforced. It is against the law to lie to congress. The Democrats are too spineless to enforce the law. The first time they charge or indict someone for lying in to congress this nonsense will stop.BY Keith on 10/27/2009 at 17:16

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.