THE HILL
 

Blackburn: Net neutrality is 'Fairness Doctrine for the Internet'

By Kim Hart - 10/20/09 11:07 AM ET

Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) spoke against net neutrality regulations today at an event put on by the Safe Internet Alliance. Representing the songwriters, singers, actors, producers and other entertainers in Memphis and Nashville, she said the creative community does not want the federal government to interfere with how they are able to get content to consumers via the Internet.

"Net neutrality, as I see it, is the fairness doctrine for the Internet," she said. The creators "fully understand what the Fairness Doctrine would be when it applies to TV or radio. What they do not want is the federal government policing how they deploy their content over the Internet and they want the ISPs to manage their networks and deploy the content however they have agreed on with ISP. They do not want a czar of the Internet to determine when they can deploy their creativity over the Internet. "They do not want a czar to determine what speeds will be available....We are watching the FCC very closely as it relates to that issue."

When it comes to broadband expansion, she said, she wants to make sure "all individuals' rights are respected and that we look at the freedom of all broadband participants." She said Congress needs to make sure the groups receiving stimulus funds for broadband expansion are able to deploy reasonable and effective network management tools so they can be helpful in tracking down illegal activity."

"We shouldn't look at technology as how do we punish and impede, but how do we encourage innovation," she said.  "That needs to be a key thought as we move forward... How do we encourage that innovation and not impede it?"




Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/63875-blackburn-net-neutrality-is-qfairness-doctrine-for-the-internetq

Comments (378)

Fairness doctrine for the Internet? Well that explains why Air America has been working on establishing an Internet presence. Other than the fact that they call for boycotts of Glenn Beck or Fox News (I think they alternate) I have not heard to much noise out of them. Beau Friedlander (yes Beau) is the 'chief editor' and Obama apologizer extraordinaire.BY Patrick Michael on 10/20/2009 at 21:19
Well why did Marsha Blackburn vote for This? Electronic Surveillance.The warrantless electronic surveillance bill (H.R. 5825) would allow electronic surveillance ofcommunication s with suspected terrorists without first obtaining approval from the secret courts established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Furthermore, the bill would authorize unwarranted surveillance for up to 90 days in some instances if a threat was considered “imminent.” Intelligence agencies would be allowed to conduct warrantless surveillance for seven days prior to gaining court approval if the threat was considered an emergency situation.” This controversial bill had full support of the Bush administration as a means to provide greater national security in a post-9/11 world. The House passed H.R. 5825 on September 28, 2006 by a vote of 232-191 (Roll Call 502). Such a law would violate the Fourth Amendment by subjecting U.S. citizens to unreasonable searches and seizures.Marsha Blackburn voted FOR this bill.See her unconstitutiona l votes at :http://tinyurl.com/qhaynaBY Mickey White on 10/20/2009 at 22:45
to Mickey White: why would we go to your obviously unreliable link to see any Congressman's vote when e can go to the Library of Congress?IN less than a year, the USA will be just like China. Say the wrong thing anywhere and you'll be thrown in jail. Don't believe it? ATT General Eric Holder has changed the definition of "national (homegrown) terrorist" to anyone that speaks against the government (Obama)BY jack wilson on 10/21/2009 at 01:10
The remarks of Congresswoman Blackburn are so astonishingly devoid of truth and light, they could only have been prepared by a telecom/ISP lobbyist with an axe to grind.The actual truth is that genuine Net Neutrality would be one of the best friends any artist could ever have. By prohibiting those that control the provision of broadband services from arbitrarily constricting those services for their own selfish and narrow interests, Net Neutrality guarantees a MUCH more level playing field - on which artists of all types can find a mass international audience - without paying tribute as serfs to their corporate "masters" who wish to control CONTENT as well as ACCESS.BY Michael Kniat on 10/21/2009 at 01:31
100 for Michael Knatt. That about sums it up.BY Alan Manning on 10/21/2009 at 04:00
Jack, my link is not unreliable, it is to my blog. Here is the run down.Marsha Blackburn Voted FOR: Omnibus Appropriations, Special Education, Global AIDS Initiative, Job Training, Unemployment Benefits, Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, Agriculture Appropriations, U.S.-Singapore Trade, U.S.-Chile Trade, Supplemental Spending for Iraq Afghanistan, Prescription Drug Benefit, Child Nutrition Programs, Surface Transportation, Job Training and Worker Services, Agriculture Appropriations, Foreign Aid, Vocational/Technical Training, Supplemental Appropriations, UN BY Mickey White on 10/21/2009 at 07:41
yeah, We all want to goverment to control our internet connections as well as they do with the post office/pattent office/social security/medicare. not to mention be poking and prodding it with new silly regulations/pork every year just to make it look like they're doing something.Yeah this will be good, I cant wait for EVERYONE who dosn't want/need a broadband connection to get one. cause we all know that fast internet is a basic human right, it's somewhere between life, liberty and the persuit of happiness isn't it?BY the will on 10/22/2009 at 08:24
FAKE! PHOTOSHOPPED!BY no douchebagery on 10/22/2009 at 08:24
To Michael and Alan, I believe you are absolutely wrong on this one. Turning the management of the internet over to the government is the worst mistake we could possibly make. Net neutraility takes the ability to mangage traffic out of the people who should be managing the traffic. Google and others have plans that frankly would overload the net with traffic that the net, especially the wireless broadband cannot bear. Everyone would suffer because of a relatively few heavy users. This is not net freedom, this is government control. The internet is one of the few things in this world that run reliably for most. Keep the government out of the Internet.BY Steve Larson on 10/22/2009 at 08:32
Anyone that is in favor of more government control ought to do the 'right thing' and remove themselves from this country.Everyday the gov gains more power and the people lose liberties.If this trend continues, there could very well be an uprising; and I don't believe that would be very pretty for anyone.It's pretty sad that I had to contemplate whether it is even 'safe' for me to mention uprising out of fear of gov retribution.Land of the free, aye?BY George on 10/22/2009 at 08:32

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Hillicon Valley Twitter - Click to follow
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.