Critics and advocates of President Obama’s Iran diplomacy are eagerly awaiting his State of the Union address — but with opposite expectations.
The liberal pro-Israel group J Street hopes the president will tell lawmakers once and for all to back off their threat to pass new sanctions the White House says could scuttle any chance at a nuclear deal.
And the Arms Control Association’s Daryl Kimball said he’d like to see Obama explain in detail why sanctions “may be well-intentioned but would sabotage progress and make a confrontation with Iran more, not less, likely.”
United Against Nuclear Iran, which supports sanctions, thinks the president should instead engage lawmakers on what the terms of a final deal should be.
“The Obama administration has not been doing this so far,” CEO Mark Wallace said. “In fact, they have been extending olive branches to Iran, while attacking Congress as reckless and war-hungry.”
On Syria, advocates say the president could help their push to allow 15,000 refugees into the U.S. by highlighting the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.
“If the president were to say anything about the United States opening its doors to Syrian refugees and continuing our proud tradition of refugee resettlement, that would be tremendous,” said Naomi Steinberg, director of Refugee Council USA.
And foreign aid advocates are counting on a renewed focus toward helping the rest of the world, as Obama prepares to unveil his budget.
“Last year, the president challenged the world to ‘eradicate … extreme global poverty,’ and I hope he builds on this vision and shares with us his plans for an inspirational legacy of American global leadership,” said Liz Schrayer, executive director of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition.