Sen. Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellThe truth is the latest casualty of today’s brand of politics McCain and Graham: We won't back short-term government funding bill Senate seen as starting point for Trump’s infrastructure plan MORE (R-Ky.) is coming under criticism from his Democratic challenger for relative silence on a possible U.S. strike against Syria.

Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, referring to McConnell, told The Hill that “being mum on issues of national security is not being a leader.”

McConnell has not released any statements regarding a possible military strike against Syria.

ADVERTISEMENT
While Speaker John BoehnerJohn BoehnerPaul Ryan sells out conservatives with healthcare surrender Matt Schlapp: 5 lessons Trump, Ryan must learn from healthcare debate Nunes rebuffs calls for recusal MORE (R-Ohio) has pressed the administration to consult with Congress and fellow Kentucky Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulTrump: 'No doubt' we'll make a deal on healthcare Overnight Defense: General says US strike probably led to civilian deaths | Tillerson to push NATO on spending | Trump taps F-35 chief Senate backs Montenegro's NATO membership MORE (R) has criticized the idea of strikes, McConnell has been quiet.

McConnell may have to tread cautiously on the issue given Paul’s opposition to a strike, which he said could end up killing Syria’s Christian minority.

McConnell is already facing a challenge from the right in local businessman Matt Bevin, and may want to avoid aggravating tensions with Tea Party conservatives who see him as too much of a GOP establishment figure.

Grimes’s comments to The Hill followed criticism on the right of her own statements on Syria.

On Wednesday, the Democratic Senate candidate told reporters that she was “monitoring” Secretary of State John KerryJohn KerryFBI Director Comey sought to reveal Russian election meddling last summer: report Congress, Trump need a united front to face down Iran One year ago today we declared ISIS atrocities as genocide MORE on Syria. Her comments were criticized by the Weekly Standard as “incomprehensible.”

Grimes sought to clarify her comments on Friday, and called for the Obama administration to figure out an exit strategy from Syria before launching a military attack.

“President Assad's use of chemical weapons against civilians is reprehensible,” she said of the Syrian leader.

“We have to hold the regime accountable, but we have to keep Kentuckians in mind … Before we engage them in a conflict, with boots on the ground, I want to make sure that there's an appropriate and proper exit strategy,” she said.

She later added in an email that she would be open to "limited missile strikes,” and that the president should consult with Congress on his strategy in Syria.

“Limited missile strikes against select military targets could send a message to Assad while reducing the risk of escalation that would pull the U.S. into Syria's civil war. We need to listen to our military leaders and make sure there is an exit plan before any boots are placed on the ground,” she said.

Grimes added: “I am continuing to monitor the situation closely and listening to what Secretary Kerry has to say this afternoon, and while not required, am hopeful that the president will lay out the evidence and strategy before Congress for ratification before taking action.”