Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonState Dept: Russia’s allegations about American citizens ‘absolutely absurd’ Trump on possible sit-down with Mueller: 'I've always wanted to do an interview' Election Countdown: Senate, House Dems build cash advantage | 2020 Dems slam Trump over Putin presser | Trump has M in war chest | Republican blasts parents for donating to rival | Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders to campaign in Kansas MORE shouldn’t start preparing her inaugural address just yet.

There are plenty of things that could trip up the Democratic presidential nominee between now and Election Day, even if polls increasingly suggest she is on track to beat Republican Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpIran claims it rejected Trump meeting requests 8 times ESPY host jokes Putin was as happy after Trump summit as Ovechkin winning Stanley Cup Russian ambassador: Trump made ‘verbal agreements’ with Putin MORE in a landslide. 

ADVERTISEMENT
Clinton has a significant advantage in recent polls both nationally and across battleground states. New polls from NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist on Friday put her in a dominant position in states that would be close in a normal election year. In Virginia and Colorado, for instance, Clinton led by 13 and 14 points, respectively. 

But those polls came after a brutal stretch for Trump, and the race could tighten significantly heading into the fall. 

Still, given the electoral map, Trump probably needs some larger development to change the trajectory of the race. Here are five scenarios that could improve Trump’s chances. 

A debate disaster

The three presidential debates offer Trump his biggest chance to reset the race. 

Clinton cannot win the expectations game in advance of the first clash, which will be held at Hofstra University on Sept. 26. The former secretary of State is a formidable debater who has been in public life for a quarter-century, and she is going up against a man who has never run for office before. Anything less than a clear-cut win for her is likely to be seen as a positive for Trump.

There are other dangers on the debate stage as well. If Trump were to debate with more substance and less bluster than anticipated, he might be able to win back some of the voters who have turned against him.

Clinton, for all her strengths, could also make a faux pas that becomes a big story. 

Back in late 2007, an infamously convoluted answer she gave in a debate about whether she supported issuing driving licenses to illegal immigrants provided then-Sen. Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaEx-White House stenographer: Trump is ‘lying to the American people’ Trump has the right foreign policy strategy — he just needs to stop talking The Hill's 12:30 Report — Trump faces bipartisan criticism over Putin presser, blames media for coverage MORE with one of his first big openings against her. 

Clinton’s comment this spring that she was “going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business” came in a town hall meeting rather than a debate. But it was an example of the kind of foot-in-mouth gaffe that could cost her.

A hacking embarrassment

The Democratic Party has already been shaken by hacks this year. 

Leaked Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails showed staffers favoring Clinton over primary rival Sen. Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersElection Countdown: Senate, House Dems build cash advantage | 2020 Dems slam Trump over Putin presser | Trump has M in war chest | Republican blasts parents for donating to rival | Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders to campaign in Kansas House Dems launching Medicare for All Caucus Let's remove the legal shield from hackers who rob us of our civil rights MORE (I-Vt.), forcing DNC's chairwoman, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.), to step down at the end of the party’s national convention last month.

There appears to be more where that came from. A New York Times report last week said that the cyberattack, which U.S. intelligences agencies believe was perpetrated by Russians, “was bigger than it first appeared and breached the private email accounts of more than 100 party officials and groups.”

If that's true, there could be more trouble to come for Clinton. The hacked emails from the DNC were made public via WikiLeaks, whose founder, Julian Assange, told the British TV network ITV in June, “We do see [Clinton] as a bit of a problem.”

Given that trustworthiness is Clinton’s biggest weak spot in polls — a Washington Post/ABC News poll this month indicated that only 38 percent of adults believe her to be honest and trustworthy, while 59 percent do not — any emails that cast doubt on her public positions could be especially damaging.

Clinton voters stay home

The nightmare scenario for Democrats: Clinton heads into Election Day confident of victory, only for liberals to stay home while Trump benefits from an unexpected surge among his white, working-class base.

There are some warning signs for Clinton. During her primary struggle with Sanders, she struggled mightily with younger voters. She seems ill-positioned to present herself as an agent of change in a year when the electorate is upset with the status quo.  

In the Washington Post/ABC poll referenced above, 57 percent of respondents declared themselves “dissatisfied” with the choice of Clinton or Trump as their next president. When that result was broken down by ideology, the percentage of liberals who felt that way (58 percent) was a fraction larger than among conservatives (55 percent). 

The other complication lies in the candidacies of the Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Gary JohnsonGary Earl JohnsonPoll: Older Arizona voters favor Trump Without ranked voting, Pennsylvania's slim margins hide voters' preferences If weed is no longer a crime, why are people still behind bars? MORE

Stein has not shown the capacity to peel away Democratic voters in large numbers — she averages just 3 percent in the RealClearPolitics national polling average. 

Johnson, however, is running more strongly, at around 8 percent. Contrary to what might be expected, given that Johnson is a former Republican, he appears to be hurting Clinton as much as Trump. Though the evidence is not conclusive, her lead in four-horse-race polls tends to be slightly smaller than in a one-on-one match-up with Trump. 

Clinton Foundation revelations 

Many Republicans lament that Trump’s capacity for controversy has allowed Clinton to skate past questions about her behavior in office.

Early last week, the State Department released emails that showed a questionable overlap between Clinton’s work as secretary of State and the foundation that bears her family name. 

In one email, Doug Band of the Clinton Global Initiative — and a close aide to former President Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonDon't place all your hopes — or fears — on a new Supreme Court justice Why did it take so long for Trump to drain the swamp of Pruitt? An orthodox legal life and the case for Judge Kavanaugh MORE — communicated with Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin, apparently looking for a State Department job for an unnamed person. In another email, Band and Abedin appeared to cooperate to try to connect a billionaire donor to the foundation with a former U.S. ambassador to Libya.

The Clinton campaign has denied any wrongdoing, arguing that Band was reaching out to Abedin in his role as Bill Clinton’s personal aide, not under the auspices of the foundation. The former ambassador, Jeffrey Feltman, has also said he never met or spoke with the donor, Gilbert Chagoury.

Those revelations were politically awkward rather than damning. But if any more grave evidence were to make its way into the public arena, that could damage Hillary Clinton badly. 

A terrorist attack

Any attack on the U.S. homeland would undoubtedly have an impact on the presidential race. 

During the early days of the Republican primary campaign, Trump’s polling numbers rose sharply in the wake of attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif. 

But he also drew criticism for his reaction to the massacre at a gay nightclub in Orlando that left 49 people dead in June. A tweet sent in the aftermath, in which Trump wrote that he appreciated “the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism,” generated backlash.

Still, Trump has polled respectably on the question of which candidate voters trust to combat terrorism — he led by 7 percentage points on that measure in a Bloomberg poll earlier this month.

The bottom line is that any kind of unforeseen news event in the final stretch of the campaign could change of the race. It’s conceivable that Trump would benefit, though nothing is guaranteed.