But Chocola said that while a vote for the plan wasn't necessarily damning in the group's eyes, a vote against the plan wouldn't earn some members sanctuary.
"It's like with [Senator] Orrin HatchOrrin HatchHow the White House got rolled on the Saudi-9/11 bill Overnight Finance: Lawmakers float criminal charges for Wells Fargo chief | Scrutiny on Trump's Cuba dealings | Ryan warns of recession if no tax reform Overnight Healthcare: Watchdog says ObamaCare program made illegal payments MORE [(R-Utah)] — he's voting to the right of Senator Jim DeMint [(R-S.C.)] these days," Chocola said, referring to the group's problems with Hatch's overall record, and DeMint's solidly conservative voting history. "I'm sure he'll vote no on this," he said. "But what we look at is the totality of their career."
Chocola called the bill a "relatively good deal" under normal circumstances, but that "when you relate it to the problem it doesn't do much good" and that the national debt has become such an overriding problem that the bill wouldn't achieve enough because some of its components were unenforceable.
"They're asking us to trust them to do the right thing later, and Congress almost never does," he said. "It's not about the spending level and cuts level. ... It's about fundamental reform that starts to fix the problem."
Updated at 3:06 p.m.