A meeting between campaign representatives for Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) and his Democratic rival Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenClinton slams Trump, but stops short of calling him racist or sexist Kasich paints himself as 'our only hope' in 'Star Wars'-themed ad White House weighs overtime rule changes MORE over barring outside groups from spending millions in the race ended without a deal.
The two campaign chiefs hit an impasse over loopholes that Warren’s team said were in a proposal put forward earlier in the week by Brown. The deal would have incentivized super-PACs and outside groups to stay out of the race by forcing candidates to donate half of anything outside groups spend on their behalf to charity.
Harney added that Warren is still confident an enforceable agreement can be reached and was committed to a final resolution that exceed mere political rhetoric.
The meeting was an unsuccessful conclusion to an unprecedented week of coordination by two political competitors seeking a mutual agreement to diminish the influence of outside groups on campaigns.
Saturday marks the second anniversary of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, which cleared the way for outside groups to make unlimited expenditures to influence elections without needing to adhere to the same contribution limits and reporting requirements as official campaigns.
At the crux of the problem is that by law, campaigns cannot coordinate with the outside groups that support them, making it difficult for them to exert influence over the groups even when their involvement is unwanted.
Both Brown and Warren have seen millions of dollars worth of attack ads aired against them by groups aligned with their opponent. Brown has asked groups on both sides to stay out of the race and has called on Warren to say the same for months.
Earlier this week, Warren proposed the two devise an “enforceable agreement” to keep unwanted groups out of their race and suggested their campaign managers meet to hash out the details. Brown’s campaign responded with a proposal dubbed the “People’s Pledge,” but Warren said she preferred the campaigns work toward a consensus in person rather than negotiate through the media.
The details of Warren’s opposition to the proposal discussed Friday were not immediately available, but her statement hinted strongly at concerns she had raised earlier: that by referring only to “independent expenditures” for television and online ads, the agreement left open the possibility that outside groups could air less ambiguous “issue ads” or sink money into the race in other ways without violating the letter of the agreement.
There is little to no precedent for what Warren and Brown have set out to accomplish in their race, one of the most closely watched Senate races of the 2012 cycle.