THE HILL
 
comment
Print

Warren Buffett sparks storm over millionaires’ tax-rate hike

By Alicia M. Cohn - 09/30/11 03:10 PM ET

Investment guru Warren Buffett set off a political firestorm Friday with a series of interviews in which he appeared to distance himself from the tax policy proposal President Obama introduced under the billionaires name.

Republicans jumped on comments from the Berkshire Hathaway CEO as proof of a lack of support, while the White House called the response a deliberate misrepresentation of Buffetts views for political reasons.

Buffett, who rarely is in the political spotlight, has become a boogeyman for the right as Obama promotes him as an example of big businesss support of the president’s tax plan.

Buffett continued that role Friday, when in a series of interviews with the top three business networks, he talked about his specific ideas for tax increases but did not specifically say which proposals of Obamas he supported.

Buffett has argued in the past that the government should raise taxes on him and his super-rich friends.

Obama, in promoting tax hikes on millionaires as part of his plan to reduce the deficit, called it the “Buffett Rule” in a nod to Buffett’s advocacy.

Buffett, making similar remarks in all three interviews, said he is happy with the use of his name on the legislation, but added he doesn’t know all of the details included in the proposal, and the only plan he advocated was a higher tax rate on people who “make money with money only.

He noted he was describing a very limited number of wealthy Americans who earn the majority of their income through capital gains, which is taxed at a 15 percent rate.

“What I’m talking about would not apply to someone that made $5 million a year as a baseball player or $10 million a year on media,” Buffett said on Fox Business Network. “It would apply only to probably 50,000 people out of 309 million who have huge incomes, pay very low taxes. There should be a policy that applies to people with money who earn lots of money and pay very low rates. If they earn it by normal jobs what I say would not hit them at all.”

The billionaire businessman caused confusion with his remarks, and it was compounded by the fact that there have been no specific details from the administration regarding what additional taxes on millionaires would entail.

Buffett, who is headlining a fundraiser for Obama on Friday evening and has close ties to the administration, made it clear that he “supports the president 100 percent” even though he might not agree with everything.

“I am a supporter of the action he’s trying to get the Congress to join him in taking,” Buffett said on CNBC. “I will look at the overall plan which they are submitting to Congress, and I will decide do I like it or do I not like it. There’s no question there will be parts I disagree with.”

Republicans used the comments as proof that Obama had taken his proposal too far even for the administration’s chosen billionaire spokesman.

“Tough day for the White House — Warren Buffett not so much a fan of President Obama’s Buffett Rule,” Brad Dayspring, communications director for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) tweeted, followed by an email from Cantor’s office quoting Buffett’s remarks.

“It appears Warren Buffett lent his name to a piece of Obama’s Jobs Plan but it doesn’t sound like he has lent his support,” the Republican National Committee noted in an email.

The White House fired back, noting Buffett supported the overall idea of raising taxes on millionaires.

“Lots of confusion out there re: what Buffett said [about] the Buffett rule,” White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer tweeted, along with a link to a liberal blog arguing that Buffett continues supporting the overarching idea of raising taxes on the wealthy.

White House press secretary Jay Carney also pushed back Friday in the White House press briefing.

“There has been a lot of I think deliberate misrepresentation for political reasons, but also misinterpretation,” Carney said.

“The overall principle that [Buffett] supports the need for wealthy Americans to pay their fair share has been fairly well established,” Carney said. “It’s a principle, a principle that should guide an overall tax-reform structure.”

Buffett emphasized his specific proposal would only apply to the “ultra-rich” — about “50,000 people.”

“It isn’t to have the rich pay more taxes. It’s to have the ultra-rich who are paying very low tax rates pay more taxes,” Buffett said on Bloomberg News. “There’s all kinds of ultra-rich who pay normal taxes, but there is a small segment — but you can find them very easily — who pay very low taxes, including me. People who make money with money only pay very low taxes at very high levels of income.”

Carney sidestepped questions about how many people would be affected by Obama’s tax proposal or whether that number would be more than 50,000.

— This story was originally posted at 11 a.m. and was last updated at 3:10 p.m.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/184761-warren-buffett-my-plan-was-not-the-buffett-rule

More Videos »

Blog Briefing Room Twitter - Click to follow
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gateway Pundit
Glenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Lucianne
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries » Day's End Round-Up »
 Energy & Environment » Midday Blog Roundup »
 Morning Read » News »
  Campaigns »   Administration »
   Civil Rights »   Congressional Campaigns »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Law and Courts »   Lobbyists »
   Presidential Campaigns »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Energy & Environment »  Lawmaker News »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Legislation »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Energy & Environment »
   Foreign Policy »   Healthcare »
   Homeland Security »   Immigration »
   Labor »   Lobbyists »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Lobbying »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Other »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Oversight »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.