THE HILL
 
comment Print

Toomey: ‘I don’t intend to violate any pledge’

By Meghashyam Mali - 11/27/12 08:57 AM ET

Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) on Tuesday said he was sticking with conservative activist Grover Norquist’s anti-tax pledge during the upcoming deficit-reduction talks.

“I don’t intend to violate any pledge,” said Toomey during an interview on CNN’s “Starting Point.” 

“My pledge is not to support higher taxes, what we are faced with in just a few weeks is a massive tax increase,” he added. “If I can help insure we don’t have that tax increase, then I believe I’ve fulfilled my pledge to fight for the lowest possible taxes.”

Toomey’s comments come as a number of his GOP colleagues in Congress have publicly broken with the Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform pledge as Washington looks for a solution to avoid the impending “fiscal cliff” of tax hikes and spending cuts taking effect in January. 

President Obama is pressuring GOP lawmakers to agree to raise taxes on the wealthy in any deficit-reduction plan, but Republicans say raising tax rates could harm job creation.

Many lawmakers though, including GOP Sens. Saxby Chambliss (Ga.) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.) as well as Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) have said they be willing to accept increased tax revenues if Democrats placed entitlement reform on the negotiating table and committed to spending cuts.

Toomey on Tuesday said he would remain opposed to efforts to raise tax rates, but is open to new revenues if matched by equivalent spending cuts and lower marginal tax rates.

“We are now just a few weeks away from a massive tax increase, and I am trying to find a way to avoid inflicting that damage on our economy and going through that,” said Toomey. “If we are going to have to have some kind of revenue increase which this president seems to be determined to do, I hope we can at least do it in the way that means the least economic harm.”

Toomey said he would like new revenues to come from closing loopholes and deductions but said those measures should be matched with lowering tax rates.  

“If we were lowering marginal rates at the same time, lower than we have today and if we were going to do something meaningful about the actual problem we have which is spending and which is the entitlement programs,” he said.

Asked if he would back new revenues without Democrats lowering rates, Toomey said “no.”

“If we are going to do something on the revenue side, lets at least not damage the economy more than we have to.”

Toomey also said he welcomed President Obama’s visit to Pennsylvania later this week as the president looks to push his tax policies to the public.

The president will visit with business owners in Pennsylvania later this week as he continues public outreach to pressure on congressional Republicans ahead of talks.

Toomey said the president seemed “absolutely determined to inflict a tax increase on the American people” and had many questions he needed to answer to the public.

“If the president actually gets the tax increase that he really wants that solves 8 percent of the projected deficit over the next 10 years, what in the world is the president’s plan for the other 92 percent? Is he going to raise taxes on the middle class, is he going to raise taxes repeatedly,” he said.

“The economy is weaker than it was two years ago, why does he want to inflict that damage now?” asked Toomey.



Source:
http://thehill.com/video/senate/269485-toomey-i-dont-intend-to-violate-any-pledge

More Videos »

Blog Briefing Room Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gateway Pundit
Glenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Lucianne
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries » Day's End Round-Up »
 Energy & Environment » Midday Blog Roundup »
 Morning Read » News »
  Campaigns »   Administration »
   Civil Rights »   Congressional Campaigns »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Law and Courts »   Lobbyists »
   Presidential Campaigns »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Energy & Environment »  Lawmaker News »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Legislation »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Energy & Environment »
   Foreign Policy »   Healthcare »
   Homeland Security »   Immigration »
   Labor »   Lobbyists »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Lobbying »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Other »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Oversight »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.