Inhofe: 'It doesn’t matter if Obama would nominate George W. Bush’
© Getty Images

Sen. James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeEPA's Pruitt: Bring back 'true environmentalism' Tax cut complete, hawks push for military increase Trump meets with oil-state GOP senators on ethanol mandate MORE (R-Okla.) on Wednesday said he would not entertain any Supreme Court nominee from President Obama, even if he nominated former President George W. Bush.

“It doesn’t matter if Obama would nominate George W. Bush,” he told host Chuck Todd on MSNBC’s MTP Daily. "I still would not do it. None at all."

“I thought it was very clear what Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSessions: 'We should be like Canada' in how we take in immigrants NSA spying program overcomes key Senate hurdle Overnight Finance: Lawmakers see shutdown odds rising | Trump calls for looser rules for bank loans | Consumer bureau moves to revise payday lending rule | Trump warns China on trade deficit MORE said, and I was very proud of him making that statement,” he added of the Senate majority leader.

“We should not be taking the nomination, considering the nomination of a president who is on his way out. We should let the people speak, and the argument is right. And we’re going to do that.”

Obama on Wednesday named Merrick Garland, the chief judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, as his pick for the nation’s highest court.

McConnell insisted that the Senate would not conduct a hearing on Garland’s confirmation, arguing that the next president should pick the next Supreme Court justice instead.

Inhofe said later that evening he spoke with Garland and informed him of his staunch opposition, adding that he bears the judge no hard feelings.

“I said, ‘I want to make sure you understand, there’s no misunderstanding,’” he said of his talk with Garland.

“’I will not support you or any other nomination of this president, because that would be breaking new ground, and I’m not going to do it,’” the Oklahoma lawmaker added. "Well, I’ll put it this way — I don’t dislike him.”

Inhofe added that he is so committed to the next president filling Supreme Court vacancies, he would even support hearings for picks made by Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonIntel Dem decries White House 'gag order' after Bannon testimony 'Total free-for-all' as Bannon clashes with Intel members Mellman: On Political Authenticity (Part 2) MORE.

“Yes, I’m willing to risk that,” he said when Todd asked him about a potential Clinton administration.

Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly last month, leaving the Supreme Court without one of its conservative members and in danger of ideological imbalance.

Critics argue that since Obama is in his final year in office, the American people should help replace Scalia by voting on the president’s successor first.

Obama has countered that he has a constitutional obligation for filling openings on the nation’s highest court as soon as possible.