The Obama administration’s decision to try former al Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, a relative of Osama bin Laden, in a New York federal court has sparked an uproar that it could compromise classified intelligence.

ADVERTISEMENT
Republicans say he should be held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and tried by a military tribunal, not a federal civilian court.

They say the administration is putting New York at risk of terrorist attack by holding the trial there and warn security costs will run in the millions of dollars.

“Gitmo, a naval vessel, Guam, anywhere other than New York, and anything other than a civilian trial. Safety is one issue, convenience to otherwise innocent people who live and work near the U.S. district court,” Rep. Trey GowdyHarold (Trey) Watson GowdyControversial ‘hack back’ bill gains supporters despite critics Top Oversight Dem pushes back on Uranium One probe Overnight Cybersecurity: Manafort, Gates to remain under house arrest | Mueller said to be closing in on Flynn | 'Hack back' bill gains steam | Election security gets attention from DHS MORE (R-S.C.) told Fox’s Greta Van Susteren.

Gowdy said a military tribunal would offer distinct advantages over a civilian jury trial, namely that military courts are made up of military officers and don’t require unanimous jury verdicts for conviction.

But Gowdy said his bigger concern is the difference in the discovery process between military and civilian courts.

In a federal court, Abu Ghaith could gain insights into the sources of methods of classified operations by demanding a thorough accounting of the evidence in discovery, Gowdy said.

“Imagine he fires his attorneys and says I'm going to represent myself, so give me all the evidence there is. Is there any guarantee that he's going to keep that discovery, some of which may be classified, from getting in the wrong hands?” Gowdy asked. “We've seen that happen before in civilian trials. So why would we take that risk?”


More from The Hill:
• Obama keeps friends, foes off-balance in his second term
• McCain wants hearings on TSA’s decision to allow knives on planes
• Critics hold the line on pro-Obama lobbying group: 'Shut it down'
• Holder’s remarks on banks ‘too large’ to prosecute reignites controversy



Abu Ghaith, Bin Laden’s son-in-law, was captured in Jordan last week.

Republican senators have also criticized the administration’s decision.

“We are disturbed by the Administration’s decision to bring Sulaiman Abu Ghaith—a foreign member of al Qaeda charged with conspiring to kill Americans – to New York for trial in federal court,” Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamCNN to air sexual harassment Town Hall featuring Gretchen Carlson, Anita Hill Trump wrestles with handling American enemy combatants Flake: Trump's call for DOJ to probe Democrats 'not normal' MORE (R-S.C.), Kelly AyotteKelly Ann AyotteTrump voter fraud panel member fights back against critics Dems plan to make gun control an issue in Nevada Stale, misguided, divisive: minimum wage can't win elections MORE (R-N.H.) and John McCainJohn Sidney McCainGOP rushes to cut ties to Moore GOP strategist: 'There needs to be a repudiation' of Roy Moore by Republicans World leaders reach agreement on trade deal without United States: report MORE (R-Ariz.) said in an updated statement Friday.

“The Obama Administration’s lack of a war-time detention policy for foreign members of al Qaeda, as well as its refusal to detain and interrogate these individuals at Guantanamo, makes our nation less safe,” the said. 


Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMcConnell expects Paul to return to Senate next week Former Hill staff calls for mandatory harassment training Gaming the odds of any GOP tax bill getting signed into law MORE (R-Ky.) blasted the administration’s decision.

“At Guantanamo, he could be held as a detainee and fulsomely and continuously interrogated without having to overcome the objections of his civilian lawyers,” McConnell said in a statement Friday.

The White House has pushed back strongly against the criticism and argues the national intelligence community agrees with the call to try of Abu Ghaith in New York.

“There is broad consensus across the United States government. At the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the intelligence community agrees the best way to protect our national security interests is to prosecute Abu Ghaith in an Article III court,” deputy White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Friday.

Earnest noted that federal courts convicted and sentenced Faisal Shahzad, who attempted to blow up a car bomb in Times Square, and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the so-called underwear bomber who tried to blow up a Northwest Airlines Flight to New York on Christmas Day in 2009.