The Obama administration’s decision to try former al Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, a relative of Osama bin Laden, in a New York federal court has sparked an uproar that it could compromise classified intelligence.

ADVERTISEMENT
Republicans say he should be held at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and tried by a military tribunal, not a federal civilian court.

They say the administration is putting New York at risk of terrorist attack by holding the trial there and warn security costs will run in the millions of dollars.

“Gitmo, a naval vessel, Guam, anywhere other than New York, and anything other than a civilian trial. Safety is one issue, convenience to otherwise innocent people who live and work near the U.S. district court,” Rep. Trey GowdyHarold (Trey) Watson GowdyWhite House lawyer’s presence at FBI meetings sets off alarm bells for Dems Dems after briefing: 'No evidence' spy placed in Trump campaign House GOP sets three FBI interviews in Clinton probe MORE (R-S.C.) told Fox’s Greta Van Susteren.

Gowdy said a military tribunal would offer distinct advantages over a civilian jury trial, namely that military courts are made up of military officers and don’t require unanimous jury verdicts for conviction.

But Gowdy said his bigger concern is the difference in the discovery process between military and civilian courts.

In a federal court, Abu Ghaith could gain insights into the sources of methods of classified operations by demanding a thorough accounting of the evidence in discovery, Gowdy said.

“Imagine he fires his attorneys and says I'm going to represent myself, so give me all the evidence there is. Is there any guarantee that he's going to keep that discovery, some of which may be classified, from getting in the wrong hands?” Gowdy asked. “We've seen that happen before in civilian trials. So why would we take that risk?”


More from The Hill:
• Obama keeps friends, foes off-balance in his second term
• McCain wants hearings on TSA’s decision to allow knives on planes
• Critics hold the line on pro-Obama lobbying group: 'Shut it down'
• Holder’s remarks on banks ‘too large’ to prosecute reignites controversy



Abu Ghaith, Bin Laden’s son-in-law, was captured in Jordan last week.

Republican senators have also criticized the administration’s decision.

“We are disturbed by the Administration’s decision to bring Sulaiman Abu Ghaith—a foreign member of al Qaeda charged with conspiring to kill Americans – to New York for trial in federal court,” Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGraham: Trump 'probably' shouldn't call use of FBI informant 'spygate' Graham on canceled summit: Trump thought North Korea was ‘playing him’ House GOP sets three FBI interviews in Clinton probe MORE (R-S.C.), Kelly AyotteKelly Ann AyotteThe Hill's Morning Report: Koch Network re-evaluating midterm strategy amid frustrations with GOP Audit finds US Defense Department wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars US sends A-10 squadron to Afghanistan for first time in three years MORE (R-N.H.) and John McCainJohn Sidney McCainTo woo black voters in Georgia, Dems need to change their course of action Senate panel again looks to force Trump’s hand on cyber warfare strategy Senate panel advances 6B defense policy bill MORE (R-Ariz.) said in an updated statement Friday.

“The Obama Administration’s lack of a war-time detention policy for foreign members of al Qaeda, as well as its refusal to detain and interrogate these individuals at Guantanamo, makes our nation less safe,” the said. 


Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGiuliani: White House wants briefing on classified meeting over Russia probe GOP senators introduce Trump's plan to claw back billion in spending The Hill's 12:30 Report — Sponsored by Delta Air Lines — Trump now says Korea summit could still happen June 12 MORE (R-Ky.) blasted the administration’s decision.

“At Guantanamo, he could be held as a detainee and fulsomely and continuously interrogated without having to overcome the objections of his civilian lawyers,” McConnell said in a statement Friday.

The White House has pushed back strongly against the criticism and argues the national intelligence community agrees with the call to try of Abu Ghaith in New York.

“There is broad consensus across the United States government. At the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the intelligence community agrees the best way to protect our national security interests is to prosecute Abu Ghaith in an Article III court,” deputy White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Friday.

Earnest noted that federal courts convicted and sentenced Faisal Shahzad, who attempted to blow up a car bomb in Times Square, and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the so-called underwear bomber who tried to blow up a Northwest Airlines Flight to New York on Christmas Day in 2009.