THE HILL
 

Romney says liberals think profits are wrong

By Michael O'Brien - 09/19/09 09:37 AM ET

Liberals in the U.S. believe that profitability is wrong, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) asserted Friday afternoon.

In a bit of a bizarre claim, Romney argued that liberals truly believe that a government-run economy should replace any private economy.

"The liberals, in their heart believe that the private enterprise system -- profitability, for instance -- that those things are inefficient and wrong, and that a government-run system would be better," Romney said in an interview on the Fox Business Network.

Romney, who made millions as a director of Bain Capital before entering politics, rejected limits on executive compensation as an infringement on freedom.

"No one wants to see excessive pay. But this is a free country," he said. "It's simply wrong to think that government knows better."

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/59453-romney-says-liberals-think-profits-are-wrong

Comments (39)

Romney IS bizarre, so Romney making bizarre claims would fit who Romney is. Other Romney bizarre claims, he stepped down from his last presidential campaign so he would not be assisting the terrorists. —- Now, that is a bizarre claim ! Romney's other bizarre claim "My sons are serving the country by serving me" helping Mitt become president. —- real weird —- did anyone check how much the Romney sons were paid for their "service" to this nation, while they were serving their father, instead of military duty? ———- ——— Now Romney DOES believe in making profits, that is no lie, and Mitt believes in shipping jobs overseas. —— here is some of Mitt profits ————- In 1992, Mitt Romney was running Bain Capital, a private equity firm. Bain Capital bought American Pad Paper Co. (Ampad) for $5 million."Over the next several years Romney's firm bled the company dry. Hundreds of workers lost their jobs. Stockholders were left with worthless shares. Creditors and vendors were paid less than 50 cents on the dollar. While they were exploiting the company, Romney's firm charged Ampad millions of dollars in "management fees."Not the only profits Mitt believes in making either.BY Ellen on 09/19/2009 at 13:52
Mitt Romney's statement seems the likely product of dimwitted political strategists who, again, play right into the hands of liberals. Liberal politicians depend very heavily on the wealthy elite to fund their campaigns, as well as organized labor. For example, liberals in Congress seemed in a panic over the stock market decline, and demanded short sale prohibitions etc., because they implicitly understood the impact of the stock market decline on their wealthy campaign contributors.However liberal politicians tend to forget those voters who can’t come up with the hefty minimum contribution necessary to attend their fundraisers, and it’s among those voters that astute Republicans have made political gains. Obama seems to understand that problem better than most and pushed heavily for more federal funding to help those with less financial resources. Also if Romney is serious about running for the Presidency, perhaps he needs to hire political strategists who implicitly understand that he's up against liberals who in some cases are more astute business-wise than he is.BY Chris Baker on 09/19/2009 at 15:56
Romney has gone nuts.BY myth on 09/19/2009 at 19:13
wrong Mitt. Liberals are all for profits only as long as it is going into their own prockets. They are against profits for anyone else but them. Liberals are just as materialistic as everyone but only as far as their own self is concerned. They are allowed to be materialistic and keep their own money. YOU and every other person in the country however, are notBY Tom K. on 09/19/2009 at 19:13
Private enterprise produces wealth, not the government.BY Jal Arky on 09/19/2009 at 19:16
"In a bit of a bizarre claim, Romney argued that liberals truly believe that a government-run economy should replace any private economy."What's the bizarre part of that claim? Making a profit is always shown as the first "bad action" of anyone the liberals choose to go after. These profits are always shown as wrong, inappropriate, and often deserving of being confiscated in full by the liberals to "stop this action".I'm not seeing how making this statement is "bizarre"; given the number of actions of liberals slamming any and all "profits" as part of their attacks on various business segments. Is there proof otherwise?Have the liberals done anything to make it easier to start or run a business in the US, or to make it easier to make a profit? Anything that could be considered "pro-profit" as it were? I'm having trouble coming up with anything recent that would help disprove this "bizarre claim"…BY gekkobear on 09/19/2009 at 19:18
Like obama told joe the plumber, bureaucrats need to multiply, be paid, run programs, and give a cut to ACORN tax preparation offices who will also sign up fresh, young…voters then spread what's left around to those waiting in line for rationed energy/health care/green jobs/mortgages 'cause when big gov decides(after trial lawyers give them ok) its fair, ok? Just ask maxine waters. Find out how much lib programs are going to cost us this week. My only worry is libs will invent a way to take more than we actually own. I'm sure joe the plumber believes big gov needs to have more access to our private health information. As long as you don't ask the wrong questions. I mean, just look at social security, medicare, va hospitals, amtrak, post office, your health and lives will be in the very best of hands as our economy becomes richer with more debt (utube pete stark).Mitt looks like a genius next to these guys.BY frankg on 09/19/2009 at 19:27
Did anyone see Michael Moore's new movie yet? All the cool people say it's really, really good.BY Bob Williams on 09/19/2009 at 19:30
Re: Ellen"did anyone check how much the Romney sons were paid for their "service" to this nation, while they were serving their father?"—-This quote would reflect perfectly what Romney is saying. Apparently you think it is wrong for people to get paid for their services (ie their campaign services). That's just what Romney was saying—that some people think getting paid is wrong.BY Mitch on 09/19/2009 at 19:31
Why would you call that claim bizarre? Given that the current President is at least liberal, and given that incentives for productivity generally lead to profitability, and also given that the current President has gone to great lengths to convince America that paying incentives, even those earned and guaranteed by contract is wrong, and should be punished, I'd say Mitt has a point.Just one question for ELLEN, how much did the guaranteed investors in GM and Chrysler get when the President "brokered" their restructuring? 50 cents on a dollar? Not even close. Call it 10.BY applebutter on 09/19/2009 at 19:32

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.