THE HILL
 

Committee votes down abortion amendment

By Jeffrey Young - 09/30/09 10:32 AM ET

The Senate Finance Committee rejected an amendment to its healthcare bill Wednesday that would have required women to purchase a separate, supplemental insurance plan to cover abortion services.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) proposed the amendment with the goal of making existing laws against federal money being used to pay for abortions, and the language in the healthcare bill, ironclad.

"All I'm asking -- my gosh -- is for specific language in the bill that prohibits federal dollars from being used to fund abortions," Hatch said.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) described Hatch's amendment as "insulting" to women.

Democrats on the committee, along with pro-abortion-rights Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine) rejected Hatch's argument, saying it would be unfair to require women to purchase separate insurance coverage for abortion services. Such a requirement, Snowe said, would raise privacy issues by asking women to anticipate their need for abortion coverage.

"It's discriminating against women," said committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who authored the bill.

The amendment failed on a 10-13 vote, with Snowe joining Democrats and Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) voting with the Republicans.

The bill, authored hews to existing laws on federal funding for abortion, Baucus argued. "The mark makes it clear that no federal funds will be used for abortion. None. None. It's very clear," he said. The existing rules, known as the Hyde amendment, includes exceptions for abortions from pregnancies resulting from rape or incest or when the life of the woman is endangered.

Under the legislation, the federal tax credits used by individuals could not be used for abortion services. Instead, the policyholder's share of the premiums would be "segregated" from the federal dollars and go toward paying for abortion coverage.

That distinction is inadequate because money is inherently fungible, Hatch argued, and the bill needs a clearer prohibition to ensure no federal money goes to pay for an abortion. "You can't establish complete segregation of the funds."

A second Hatch amendment, designed to strengthen existing "conscience clause" laws protecting healthcare workers from performing abortions or other services to which they have moral or ethical objections, also failed on a 10-13 vote. Once again, Snowe voted with the Democrats and Conrad with the Republicans.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/60911-committee-votes-down-abortion-amendment

Comments (11)

As a woman voter from Michigan, Debbie Stabenow in no way represents ME, so Ms. Stabenow, please do not speak for me. I am far from insulted that Sen. Hatch brought forth this amendment. I am thankful to him and others who try to prevent monies that are taken from my family and given to our government from going to organizations, etc whose sole purpose is to snuff out innocent life. It is immoral to me, and I dare say, to countless other Americans. If someone wants to take the life of an infant, and it's "legal" in our society, then they can pay for it themselves. I should NEVER be forced to fund the taking of life in the guise of "medical care". Olympia Snowe is one reason why the Republican party will cease to exist as a viable party soon. She has left the party platform in favor of keeping up with America's declining moral values. So be it. Life has shown that many times people/societies, etc have to hit rock bottom before they can be 'revived'…It's very easy to see that we are heading downward, not up. May the Lord help this country in spite of it's rejection of Him…BY Cindy on 09/30/2009 at 13:08
These arguments were invalid in 1859, and still are in 2009:If you think slavery is wrong, then donBY MKS on 09/30/2009 at 15:03
"May the Lord help this country in spite of it's rejection of Him…"Cindy, bin Laden is trying his best to rid the world of all the heathens. Maybe you should join his crowd?BY Buck on 09/30/2009 at 15:20
These arguments were invalid in 1859, and still are in 2009: (1a) If you think slavery is wrong, then donBY MKS on 09/30/2009 at 15:30
Obviously, my posts are being truncated. Why?BY MKS on 09/30/2009 at 15:52
MS. STABENOW, Please do not speak for all women. Most of us do not want our tax dollars spent on abortions. Abortions are murders from beginning to end (I do not agree with the Partial Birth Abortion legislation especially) That is a brutal practice. If a woman wants an abortion she should pay for it herself, out of her own pocket or that of the responsible male counterpart bearing all the responsibility on both of them ONLY!BY Anna on 09/30/2009 at 19:38
What sort of country insists that others pay for what they consider murder. One that cares nothing for their fellow man. Whether you believe it is murder or not, which I do how frigt'tening it is to see people callousing wanting to force others to pay for it! There are provisions in unions to set aside unions dues from being used to promote political candidates, we should have something for any health care program forced upon this nation. What kind of people are you that you care nothing for the feelings of those that feel they are being forced to pay for murder.BY erin  on 09/30/2009 at 19:49
The senate and congress don't care about anything it seems. They show this even today that they want power and that is it. What about our soldiers…they won't meet with the general about troops for the afghanistan war, MI senators voted NO on this issue and they don't want the republicans involved in the health care proposal…"no room for them at the table". 35 proposals were submitted by repub's and all denied. Their majority power has gone to their heads. The next election will be an interesting one as they loose seats. I know I am not impressed with MI senators.BY anna on 10/01/2009 at 19:34
Americans are forced to pay for murder everytime US imperialism invade and occupy a country - Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq - and everytime it provides arms and funds to Israel to massacre Palestinians. So come off the 'humanitarian outrage' faking.BY Lil Joe on 10/01/2009 at 23:43
I agree I do not want to fund abortion with my tax dollars. People see it a a quick fix, but the female body was not designed to take this abuse. The Japanese have learned the long term affects are devastating the female organs are weakened. Then when the female wants to get pregnant and have a child, her body will abort the child automatically. The cervix is weaken and opens automatically. Of course their emotional experience to be considered.BY carolyn conwell on 10/06/2009 at 18:54

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
Bannered across Drudge this morning is a question most of us in the Beltway have asked about the snow storm Friday: "When will it stop?" Below, Drudge links to an AP article on the recent trouble facing New York Gov. David Paterson (D), who many thought was about to be rocked by political scandal by a forthcoming story in The New York Times. That story hasn't arrived -- but speculation about its contents surely has -- leading Paterson to say he would depart office only as a result of the ballot box, or if he's carried out "in a box."… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"KEEP TRYING" -- That's the message one HuffPo writer took from the latest WaPo/ABC poll, which showed 63 percent of Americans still favored further action on healthcare reform. Additionally, Ryan Grim posts his recent interview with Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who predicted his chamber's historic filibuster could "fall of its own weight -- it should fall of its own weight -- or it will fall after some massive conflict on the floor, which has happened in the past where there have been rulings from the chair that have led to reform."… Read More »
The Corner
The Corner's Mark Krikorian points out in a recent post that the private sector -- namely, the National Review -- was able to devise how many immigrants were residing within the United States faster than the U.S. government could produce that data. And offering further proof that former Gov. Sarah Palin's (R-Alaska) crib notes have become something of a political meme is Kathryn Jean Lopez, who notices a famous country singer penning notes on his hand.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
"The story of coals dirty, deadly legacy" headlines The Washington Independent this morning. The story relates the political significance, health effects and community impacts of a fossil fuel that reporter Mike Lillis believes has White House's clear embrace.Earlier, Lillis looked at one element of Democrats' forthcoming jobs bill: A proposed unemployment insurance extension. The bill offers jobless Americans an additional three months of aid -- less than what the White House's budget requests, but on par with the House's extention, passed late last year.… Read More »
Red State
Michael Steele's remark this week -- that he has been subject to intense criticism because of his race -- has earned the scorn of Red State's Eric Erickson, who lambasts the Republican National Committee chairman in a blog post published late Tuesday. "Actually, it could have nothing to do with race and everything to do with outsourcing the RNC to the same consultants who have been bleeding the RNC dry for years," he says of Steele's low popularity. "It could have something to do with management styles. It could have everything to do with the Chairman never meeting a shoe he didn’t want to eat."… Read More »
MyDD
Jonathan Singer on Wednesday explores the current state of President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. But with the help of Slate's Doug Kendall, he finds that the president has both nominated fewer and confirmed fewer judges to federal benches than his predecessor at this point in his presidency. Concludes Singer: "But with a real crisis in the judiciary in the form of dozens of vacancies, one has to wonder why this President has nominated fewer than half of the judges nominated by his predecessor."… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.