THE HILL
 

150 Dems to Pelosi: No tax on health insurance

By Tony Romm - 10/07/09 09:50 AM ET

More than 150 House Democrats have urged Speaker Nancy Pelosi to quash a new tax on expensive insurance plans.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Pelosi (D-Calif.), a broad coalition of Blue Dogs and progressives said the proposed fee should not be included in the chamber's final healthcare reform bill.

They said the tax on so-called Cadillac insurance plans that exceed certain cost thresholds — a 40 percent fee that is already part of the Senate Finance Committee’s draft bill — would “inevitably extend to more and more middle-income Americans across the country.”

“Real life experience with both health insurers and inelastic markets for services such as health insurance has clearly warned us that this tax will be passed along to insurance payers,” wrote Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.), who is spearheading the effort.

The high-cost insurance tax has been a sticking point throughout this year's healthcare debate.

The idea's chief proponents point to a Congressional Budget Office projection that the tax could deliver up to $215 billion in revenue over the next 10 years. The Finance Committee included the tax in its forthcoming bill as a significant offset that has so far kept the bill deficit-neutral.

But critics charge that insurance companies would recover their losses by increasing their subscribers' premiums, eventually passing the tax on to consumers.

For the most part, Pelosi has remained open to a host of fees and other means to pay for healthcare reform.

On Tuesday, she even discussed the possibility of a value-added tax (VAT), which would assess fees based on how much value a manufacturer adds to a product. The Speaker insists any change to the tax code included in healthcare reform would not adversely affect middle-class Americans.

But Democrats on Wednesday compared the proposed excise tax compared to the Alternative Minimum Tax, which eventually affected middle-income workers despite its proponents' insistence otherwise.

“America's Affordable Health Choices Act includes sensible revenue sources to pay for the legislation,” the lawmakers wrote. “However, inclusion of an excise tax on high-cost insurance plans ... could have significant and detrimental effects for millions of middle-class Americans.”


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/62003-over-150-dems-to-rail-against-high-cost-insurance-tax

Comments (12)

How many times do you have to shoot yourself in the foot before it falls off. Democrats have no one to blame but dear old, doddering Comrade Pelosi for the fall of the empire.BY Reality Check on 10/07/2009 at 11:50
I am 62 and have owned an individual hospitalization policy since 1998. My deductible is $3,500, then 100% up to 2 million. Our Congress says this is a cadillac plan because I pay $1019 per month just for me. I am very healthy except I have high blood pressure, a pre-existing condition for at least one year should I change carriers. I have received total claims of $2,700. In May, Golden Rule will raise my rates again as they will for all 62 year olds who bought in 1998 and were then in excellent health. All the healthy folks have left. Now Congress wants to tax me through the insurance company another 40%. After I am elligible for medicare in a little over 2.3 years, I will have been soaked by Congress and Golden Rule Ins. Co. I have asked for total premiums, but it is apparent, the cost is many times over my claims. JSBY John Springer on 10/07/2009 at 11:56
Pelosi's answer to everything…tax, tax, tax. Maybe we'll get lucky and the swine flu will get the pig.BY TruthfulTerry on 10/07/2009 at 12:09
|Anybody who thinks that we all - rich, middle class and poor - not going to pay for Obamacare is being naive. And you can bet your bottom dollar that Obama will say there really are no new taxes.BY Humphster on 10/07/2009 at 12:15
Don't forget about the VAT tax she wants. There will be no "reform" just another tax to bleed us dry, right when doing so would be sheer economic suicide.BY Peter on 10/07/2009 at 12:19
Welcome to the world of tax, tax, and tax again. Mrs. Pelosi hasn't met a tax that she doesn't like. Unfortunately, Congress has long since exempted themselves from every provision that are in any of the proposed bills now before Congress. If they were to submit themselves to the same lame choices they are trying to inflict upon the rest of us, I might support the forced seizure of health care by nationalizing it. Since they don't, I won't ever lend my support.Richard VailPikesville, MDhttp://thevailspot.blogpspot.comThe strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.—Thomas JeffersonBY Richard Vail on 10/07/2009 at 14:39
Regardless of whether or not it's used for health care, we need higher taxes. Sorry if I don't feel like the rest of you, but I'm a realist. A VAT tax is a good idea. We should also increase the Medicare payroll tax. People love to say Medicare is going broke and it's all the government's fault. The tax hasn't been increased since 1984. How much has your insurance premium increased since 1984?BY andreams on 10/07/2009 at 15:46
Donations are now being accepted to send a case of Q-Tips to Ms Pelosi - she is not listening.BY jadedfellow on 10/07/2009 at 15:54
Boy does this web site has terrible commenters. Why is it that crazy right-wingers who like to dream about other people catching swine flu always gravitate to news sites like this?BY TValley on 10/07/2009 at 18:59
Heaven forbid we actually pay for expanded health care coverage. Let's just pass an unfunded bill and make younger workers foot the bill for the next generation. We should remove the entire exemption. It is an unbelievably regressive accident in the tax code. If you have no health insurance—you get no benefit from the exemption for employer provided health insurance. If you have to self-insure—you get no benefit from the exemption for employer provided health insurance. Then imagine two married families with identical health care plans, but the one family earns $65,000 while the other earns $250,000. The second family gets to reduce it's income tax bill by roughly twice the first family, because of the applicable income tax rates. What an insane policy!Any Democrat who opposes taxing cadillac plans is more concerned with currying favor with labor union bosses than protecting real low income workers.BY Adam on 10/11/2009 at 10:07

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.