THE HILL
 

Catholic bishops demand changes to health bill, threatening opposition

By Michael O'Brien - 10/08/09 05:18 PM ET

Roman Catholic bishops wrote lawmakers Thursday, warning them to change key provisions in health reform legislation, or risk the opposition of the church.

Three key bishops heading up the U.S. Catholic church's healthcare reform efforts said they would have "no choice" but to oppose the bills unless they removed certain provisions on abortion, and include measures to cover the poor, children, and immigrants.

"On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), we are writing to express our disappointment that progress has not been made on the three priority criteria for health care reform that we have conveyed previously to Congress," the bishops wrote in an open letter to members of Congress. "If final legislation does not meet our principles, we will have no choice but to oppose the bill."

The bishops -- William Murpohy of Rockville Center, Cardinal Justin Rigali of Philadelphia, and Josh Wester of Salt Lake City -- outlined the conditions for their support, most forcefully on abortion.

Health reform legislation must exclude federal funding for abortions, the bishops said, and adopt language that allows individuals to object to providing abortions because of their consciences.

The bishops also argued that the bill must "make quality healthcare affordable and accessible to everyone," especially the poor, as well as provide "an adequate safety net" to immigrants and others who remain uncovered.

"We sincerely hope that the legislation will not fall short of our criteria," the trop said. "However, we remain apprehensive when amendments protecting freedom of conscience and ensuring no taxpayer money for abortion are defeated in committee votes."

"If acceptable language in these areas cannot be found, we will have to oppose the health care bill vigorously," they added.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/62343-catholic-bishops-demand-changes-to-health-bill-threatening-opposition

Comments (13)

The church has a tax-sheltered status but once they start getting into politics, that status should change. If they want to talk about leaving out abortion, fine, but when they talk about covering immigrants (I assume that means illegal), they are talking about breaking the law. That is not something they should preaching. Illegals are here illegally and should not be covered. The AMERICAN poor and children and already covered, so this seems to be about illegals and won't fly.BY MaryR on 10/08/2009 at 18:45
Talk about empty threats. The monolithic Catholic vote that may have existed up until Vatican II is long gone. History notes that pro-choice politicians like Mario Cuomo, John Kerry, Joe Biden, Barack Obama and Ted Kennedy suffered very little at the hands of "organized" Catholics. Having said that I must hasten to add that the bishops are right that no person of conscience should be made to perform or assist in performing an abortion. The taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize what many of us feel is murder. It is also basic Catholicism that we, as a community, show compassion to all persons in need, whatever the circumstances. Christ's last act of mercy before his death was rendered to a thief. Perhaps the Bishops would be taken more seriously if the Church took bold steps to end clerical abuse of children. As the Bishops criticise the motes in the eyes of others, this beam still remains in their collective eye.BY Brian John Murphy on 10/08/2009 at 23:56
I knew there was a reason I left the church! Those Bishops are worse than lobbyists… Hell they are lobbyists telling the congress to change a bill or they will go against the health care bill. A few small brained individuals that control smaller brained individuals who one day will wake up and realize that … They had it pretty good here in AMERICA, wHAT THE HELL HAPPENED?BY TaD on 10/09/2009 at 00:11
In order to understand what is happening, one must realize that the sheltered hierarchy is awakening from a coma and the landscape is unrecognizable. They realize it is do or die, or the Catholic witness in America is finished. It may be too little too late.BY William H. Phelan on 10/09/2009 at 00:26
We must support them - better late than never. We need our clergy to wake up - why are you pupping? Illegals cannot be denied help - read Luke 10:26-38 - The Good Samaratin again. Get behind The Bishops on this - they are finally taking a stand against abortion and ultimatelt against this kind of unholy leadership's legislation. Vatican II indeed was a mess - but this is a new day, with the old 'bad fruits' rotting away. Time for going 'back to the future' and restoring all things in Christ. Pray for them.BY Adrienne Szatkowski on 10/09/2009 at 04:58
I believe in separating Church from State and from Education ! I am not religeous and I don't want to support any Church with my tax dollars !BY joel on 10/09/2009 at 05:46
——"Illegals cannot be denied help - read Luke 10:26-38"—- Superman can fly - read Dell Comics -Volume 3, page 6BY NonBeliever on 10/09/2009 at 11:25
If the bishops watched C-Span they would know that there is no added abortions regulations and the conscience clauses remain in effect. Emergency rooms will still care for anyone that walks in the door. In the guise of social justice this is a republican platform but Catholics do not vote their bishops! the bishops are not infallible and are politicians should not mislead the flock!BY cleo on 10/09/2009 at 11:44
Lets be clear.Abortion is legal in the United States.The health bill is not the place to change this law.The health bill is about providing health care not enforcing religious or personal beliefs.Don't cloud the health reform with personal preferences.If you think abotion laws need to be changed,find another avenue that won't postpone a much needed bill.BY Charles Boulay on 10/09/2009 at 13:06
Lets face it, plastic surgery is legal in the US. The health bill is no place to change this law. If abortion is covered then so should plastic surgery. Both are elective procedures that do not fix any medical condition, so why should abortion be paid for by tax payers and plastic surgery not be covered? I know this sounds stupid, but so does the reasoning to not exclude tax payer funded abortion.BY Greg on 10/10/2009 at 18:07

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Huffington Post
Huffpo's banner headline reads "SATURDAY NIGHT'S ALRIGHT FOR FIGHTIN'" about tomorrow night's first procedural vote in the Senate on healthcare reform legislation. A bill that would allow an audit of the Federal Reserve passed the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. … Read More »
Drudge Report
"10 HRS OF DEBATE SATURDAY; VOTE 8 P.M." banners Drudge about the first procedural vote on the Senate's healthcare reform bll scheduled to take place tomorrow. Drudge links to a release from House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office saying that the Senate bill has a "monthly abortion fee." … Read More »
Buzzflash
Pmcarpenter writes that establishment Democrats are beginning to fret over the gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey. Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) is the blog's "GOP hypocrite of the week" for his House floor speech about the 9/11 civilian terror trials. … Read More »
Firedoglake
Attaturk posts video of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart grilling former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. Blue Texan asks why 2008 presidential candidate and former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) said the war in Afghanistan is lost. … Read More »
RedState
Erick Erickson explores wether or not voting for cloture on healthcare reform is a vote for the bill. A new poll shows Rep. Roy Blunt (R) and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan (D) running close to even in the Show Me State's 2010 Senate race. … Read More »
The Corner
Kathryn Jean Lopez publishes a letter from a National Review donor. Rich Lowry wonders when the "divisive" Crist-Rubio GOP Florida Senate primary will end, saying it is bad for the party. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.