THE HILL
 

CBO: Malpractice bill would save $54B

By Jeffrey Young - 10/09/09 12:57 PM ET

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) gave a notable boost Friday to backers of capping medical malpractice lawsuits, issuing an analysis that concludes reforms would save the government $54 billion over 10 years and cut national healthcare spending by 0.5 percent a year.

WIth a Democratic president and Democrats in control of Congress, passing any bill that would limit how much money patients can win in lawsuits against doctors is highly unlikely. Democrats contend it would be unfair to curb the rights of wronged patients to seek restitution.

The CBO report nevertheless gives fresh ammunition to Republicans who argue that malpractice reform is a serious, unaddressed problem in the healthcare system — and one that would produce real savings to the federal government and American consumers if resolved.

"That’s not chump change. It’s a no-brainer to include tort reform in any health care reform legislation," Senate Finance Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said in a statement.

If Democrats do ignore the CBO's findings, they would also open themselves to Republican attacks that the party is beholden to its allies in the trial bar.

CBO Director Doug Elmendorf, whose agency as recently as December did not believe malpractice reform to be a significant money-saver, explains the changed thinking in a post on his blog.

"Tort reform could affect costs for health care both directly and indirectly: directly, by lowering premiums for medical liability insurance; and indirectly, by reducing the use of diagnostic tests and other health care services when providers recommend those services principally to reduce their potential exposure to lawsuits," Elmendorf wrote.

In the past, the CBO would only score the savings related to lower malpractice insurance premiums but, Elmendorf explains, "more recent research has provided additional evidence to suggest that lowering the cost of medical malpractice tends to reduce the use of health care services."

Republicans and physician groups have waged an aggressive but unsuccessful campaign for years to enact a nationwide limit on how much juries can award patients in malpractice lawsuits. The Republican-controlled House passed legislation numerous times in the 2000s but the matter never prevailed in the Senate. California, Texas and other states have enacted lawsuit damage caps.

President Barack Obama pledged to include measures to address medical malpractice as part of healthcare reform but does not support caps on lawsuit awards.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who requested the CBO analysis, criticized Obama's stance. "These numbers show that this problem deserves more than lip service from policymakers. Unfortunately, up to now, that has been all the president and his Democratic allies in Congress have been willing to provide on these issues."

Researchers have been divided about just how profound the effect would be on healthcare costs but the CBO had always maintained that balance of the evidence suggested it would be modest. That conclusion was mostly due to the difficulty of quantifying how much money is wasted on so-called defensive medicine, a term for doctors ordering up possibly unnecessary tests and procedures to shield themselves from charges they failed to do enough to help their patients.

According to the CBO, $41 billion of the budgetary savings would be the result of lower spending in Medicare, Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. In addition, the government would raise $13 billion in additional tax revenue because wages would increase as healthcare costs decrease.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/62461-malpractice-reform-would-save-54b-cbo-says

Comments (11)

Unless Republicans are planning to vote for the health care reform bill, why should Democrats add this to the bill?Dems should call their bluff. Tell them come to the table and truly negotiate with us including addding malpractive reform with Republican votes and will will add it.BY Michelle on 10/09/2009 at 14:49
Tort reform is a bad call. Here in CA, we have some of the strictest tort reform laws in the country and non-economic damages are capped at $250,000. That means, in CA, if you lose both your legs due to medical malpractice and you work at an office job where you will be able to continue your occupation, the most you can sue for is $250,000!!! After lawyers fees and court fees you're probably looking at closer to $150,000. Can anyone argue that that's just compensation for having your legs cut off? I don't think so.BY Ryan on 10/09/2009 at 15:04
Sincere thanks to Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) for requesting this comprehensive CBO analysis, which seems the first of it's kind. $54 billion over ten years is very significant, and especially so given that the Senate Finance committee markup would add to the deficit if you exclude the gimmick of reversing federal subsidies for Medicare Advantage providers that were intended to be temporary.BY Chris Baker on 10/09/2009 at 15:06
Ryan,I don't believe you. Florida did a similar thing. They limited punitive damages at 250K. You can still sue for loss of wages, medical care and so. Why should someone and the lawyers get millions when another human makes a mistake. Especially if it only causes "emotional distress"!BY Greg on 10/09/2009 at 15:23
Cutting health care costs by $5,400,000,000 or 0.5% per year on average is a large number. But what about the remaining yearly health care costs of $1,074,600,000,00 0? It is interesting how some folks can get excited about the smaller number and yet maintain that the larger one (99.5% of the cost) is reasonable and fair.BY Brent on 10/09/2009 at 16:40
As a physician in practice for over 35 years, I can say that the CBO estimate of savings is very conservative. Two nights ago on PBS news a Dr. from the Netherlands was interviewed. He said that they can handle up to 40% of the problems over the phone! This can't happen inthis country in the medicolegal claimate that exists here. If a patient calls in with a headache, not only will he be told to come in,but til allis said and done, he will get a CAT scan. Compare the cost of the two approaches.BY George Lapes, MD on 10/09/2009 at 21:11
The most important question is where do the savings go?Comparative costs in Texas and California have not shrunk in the wake of magical tort reform. Consumer costs are the same. So who's pocketing the giant cost savings?BY Loki on 10/09/2009 at 22:33
Greg, you misunderstood. There are many cases of medical malpractice that don't keep the individual from working. If you can continue working you can't sue for economic damages! And money for medical expenses are paid for just that. You ridicule emotional damages but the emotional damages from say, losing both of your legs as in my first example, are very real and clearly worth more than $250,000. In fact its often hard to find a lawyer willing to take on the lawyer team from the malpractice insurance company when the potential payout is so small.BY Ryan on 10/09/2009 at 23:34
And to Loki, you're right, patients will not see savings from medical malpractice reform. The theory is that if awards are capped malpractice insurance companies will charge doctors less, and doctors will therefore charge patients less. The hole in that theory is that doctors don't set their wages! They take whatever compensation for procedures they can get from insurance companies. So if doctor's malpractice insurance suddenly gets cheaper, it does not translate into lower premiums.BY Ryan on 10/09/2009 at 23:36
CYA medical testing seldom enriches the ordering physician, but contributes greatlly to the total cost of medical care. Tort reform is an essential component of cost conttrol.BY Jimbo on 10/12/2009 at 22:10

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.