THE HILL
 

U.S. spending $3.6 billion a month in Afghanistan according to CRS report

By Roxana Tiron - 10/14/09 04:08 PM ET

The U.S. spends about $3.6 billion a month in Afghanistan, according to data provided by the Congressional Research Service recently.

The average cost per month is calculated at an average 51,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, but that number likely will go higher with the 68,000 troops the Obama administration already is planning on having in that country, and could double if President Barack Obama backs a reported request from Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander in Afghanistan, to send as many as 40,000 more troops to the country.

The cost of sending one U.S. soldier in Afghanistan for one year is $1 million versus an estimated $12,000 for an Afghani soldier, according to Steve Daggett, a specialist with the Congressional Research Service. Those numbers fall within the calculations that the Obama administration has been using. The Obama administration is calculating $1 billion per 1,000 troops deployed to Afghanistan.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/63121-crs-calculates-cost-of-us-troop-presence-in-afghanistan

Comments (21)

what is the comparison to Iraq per soldier per month x 7 years???Let's be clear here - we are cost saving at the detriment of Afghanistan - which is what the US has ALSO done the past 7 years. We are currently paying the Piper for leaving the Afghan people in the lurch. They don't trust us — and why should they?BY Kay Pealstrom on 10/14/2009 at 18:16
oh but we can't afford healthcare right?and we can't take care of our unemployed eh?BY Ray on 10/14/2009 at 18:23
The price seems extraordinarily steep given that the average American household lives $33,000 /-; however, the truth of the matter is that if that amount of money is the costs to outfit our soldiers with the gear and supplies that they need, then so be it. I was appalled to hear of Marines on the front lines without body armor as I am sure that we all remember. It is important to note that while it is prudent to fight in Washington to (depending on which plan you buy into) either pull out now or to invest in a troop surge that could potentially quell the fighting and allow for peace building and infrastructure repair to commence, it is even more prudent to ensure the lives of everyone we can who must fight this war. The fact of the matter is that the men and women that would need that one million dollars per soldier per year are not reaping the benefits of an overinflated pork policy, they are 18-24 year olds that just want to make it home safely. I ask that we as a society do not them pay that cost in blood. Moreover, our modern military industrial complex is for the most part the extensions of domestic companies whom could use the monetary incentive of a government contract to avoid layoffs. There's nothing wrong with a little Keynesianism every now and then.BY Andre on 10/14/2009 at 18:37
That isn't the incremental cost of an additional soldier. That is the total cost divided by the number of soldiers. So, if you had a war that was being fought with all machines 1 soldier, the average cost per soldier would be a lot higher, but it would be a better situation.BY Jocko on 10/14/2009 at 18:50
I wonder what the cost per person would be when they added all the contractors there and in operation through out the world! Biggest swindle on earth! 51k troops and ??? contractors no wonder the wars are costing so much! Capitalism at work I guess!BY Greg on 10/14/2009 at 18:53
I am a firm believer in moral corruption as a weapon. And I am absolutely certain that if just fifty percent of the money we are spending on the un-winnable war in Afghanistan were dedicated to subverting the morals of the people no one would have to worry about terrorism. Booze, broads (or boys) burgers and bribery applied in ample quantities will take the starch out of any insurgency.BY Luschnig on 10/14/2009 at 19:26
…and lemme guess,,about $40,000 goes toward outfitting feeding the grunt and the rest of that $1,000,000 is PROFIT for war corps.BY cwolf on 10/14/2009 at 20:01
I got an idea, let's bring our troops home and give every one of the $1M, talk about a stimulus package!BY gary on 10/14/2009 at 20:31
are the gov't contractors, AKA mercenaries, considered in these calculations?BY motamota on 10/15/2009 at 01:06
Wow… I wonder how many soldiers think their presence on the ground there is worth $1 million dollars? I mean, holy ****. I'd like to know how they calculate that a soldier on the ground for a year at a cost of $1 million does more good than if you kept that soldier home, paid him/her $50,000, then spent the other $950,000 on other ways to fight terrorism.Our government leaders are so screwed up.BY George on 10/15/2009 at 02:14

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Huffington Post
Huffpo's banner headline reads "SATURDAY NIGHT'S ALRIGHT FOR FIGHTIN'" about tomorrow night's first procedural vote in the Senate on healthcare reform legislation. A bill that would allow an audit of the Federal Reserve passed the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. … Read More »
Drudge Report
"10 HRS OF DEBATE SATURDAY; VOTE 8 P.M." banners Drudge about the first procedural vote on the Senate's healthcare reform bll scheduled to take place tomorrow. Drudge links to a release from House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office saying that the Senate bill has a "monthly abortion fee." … Read More »
Buzzflash
Pmcarpenter writes that establishment Democrats are beginning to fret over the gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey. Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) is the blog's "GOP hypocrite of the week" for his House floor speech about the 9/11 civilian terror trials. … Read More »
Firedoglake
Attaturk posts video of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart grilling former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. Blue Texan asks why 2008 presidential candidate and former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) said the war in Afghanistan is lost. … Read More »
RedState
Erick Erickson explores wether or not voting for cloture on healthcare reform is a vote for the bill. A new poll shows Rep. Roy Blunt (R) and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan (D) running close to even in the Show Me State's 2010 Senate race. … Read More »
The Corner
Kathryn Jean Lopez publishes a letter from a National Review donor. Rich Lowry wonders when the "divisive" Crist-Rubio GOP Florida Senate primary will end, saying it is bad for the party. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.