THE HILL
 

Gingrich endorses Scozzafava in NY-23 race

By Tony Romm - 10/16/09 09:59 AM ET

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) may have stepped into a political quagmire after endorsing a moderate New York Republican's special election bid.

A host of GOP leaders have tried to distance themselves from the ongoing showdown between Assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava, a centrist Republican, and Doug Hoffman, the local Conservative Party's candidate. But Gingrich offered his perspective to the three-way contest for now-Army Secretary John McHugh's vacant seat on Friday when he became one of only a handful of conservative Republicans to openly back his party's struggling candidate.

“The special election for the 23rd Congressional District is an important test leading up to the mid-term 2010 elections,” Gingrich said of Scozzafava's candidacy in a statement to supporters, as reported by the The Post-Standard. “Our best chance to put responsible and principled leaders in Washington starts here, with Dede Scozzafava.”

Gingrich's key endorsement could spell good news for Scozzafava, heretofore supported only lukewarmly by her own party. Already, the Club for Growth, Concerned Women of America, evangelical leader Gary Bauer, former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) and a host of other GOP supporters and lawmakers have sided with Hoffman, who has recently posted gains in preliminary polls.

By contrast, only about 17 Republicans have even written checks to Scozzafava's campaign, and the party's conference chairman -- Rep. Mike Pence (Ind.) -- has altogether steered clear of the tough race.

At issue for some unsure Republicans seems to be a fear of a possible political backlash. Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Tx.) knows that feeling all too well; after he announced his backing for Scozzafava, his conservative base attacked him viciously, specifically harping intimidate details of his personal life.

Gingrich, however, seems not to care about this brewing, inner-party divide. Instead, he championed Scozzafava's candidacy on Friday as the future of the party -- not necessarily the harbinger for a lingering party divide, as some pundits have speculated.

“The Republican Revolution in 1994 started very much like what we see today,” the former speaker said.  “Like then, our country is reeling from misguided liberal policies, high taxes and out-of-control spending. This special election in New York’s 23rd Congressional District could be the first election of the new Republican Revolution, but we need the momentum to get it started.”


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/63455-gingrich-endorses-scozzafava-in-ny-23-race

Comments (21)

I fail to understand why Newt would support a candidate who is an abortion rights advocate and who favors gay marriage. She is not a fiscal conservative, either. As a state assemblywoman she voted for massive tax increases, Democratic budgets, a $180 million bank bailout, and she supported the $787 billion Federal stimulus package. We must go beyond parties and vote for candidates who stand for limited government and our free enterprise system!BY Catherine in Utica,  on 10/16/2009 at 11:50
Some House Republican leaders are trying to use national criteria to evaluate individual candidates, which is a formula to become a permanent minority party. Instead the evaluation should be to divide the district into conservative and liberal on a range of issues. Then the question becomes does Dede Scozzafava or Doug Hoffman better represent the conservative half of district voters on this range of issues. PS: Applying district-centered criteria to evaluate candidates also means the national party will be forced to evolve its national positions as the electorate changes.BY Chris Baker on 10/16/2009 at 12:05
Go Hoffman! I would rather have a democrat than another pretend republican. Hoffman, the Tea party candidate. The fallout of him winning or finishing 2nd to the democrat would force the beltway repubs to rethink things.BY Mark on 10/16/2009 at 13:41
I guess it's time to leave Newt by the wayside too! The Republican elites just don't get it… and I'm not sure that they will. There is a fight brewing and it's not going to be between Republicans and Democrats. It's going to be between the Republican elites and their base.BY Kurt P on 10/16/2009 at 16:15
I agree that Hoffman is the better candidate. Not my district but I have a concern here. Last election I donated money for the first time. Over $300. I am a registered Dem. looking to go R or I: which one? If I go R I can help choose candidates in primary. Not wait until the election to chose the lesser of 2 evils. People are getting angry about this choice: let TEA candidates run or risk a loss to the Libertarians eventually. That's the message. I think I sent Hoffman a check; also Rubio in FL instead of the RNCC person; same story; too RINO! Newt better wake up along with Graham of SC and Bush of FL governorship! It is the constitutional and less govt intervention people who are looking for a change it won't be to wishy-washy Repuiblicans if they keep this up.BY sandyinohio on 10/16/2009 at 17:30
I always thought Newt was conservative… if you watch this video (it's a documentary about him) it will peel the skin back off your face.. you will determine Newt SHOULD NOT be someone who ever speaks for the Conservative movement… as I watched i thought 'maybe this is just opinion' - not until i saw that he forwarded a book written by a hard progressive and then his own book calling for a move to progressive politics… Watch it and determine for yourself…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTjMjSXy30UBY Another Opinion on 10/17/2009 at 00:59
I always thought Newt was conservative… if you watch this video (it's a documentary about him) it will peel the skin back off your face.. you will determine Newt SHOULD NOT be someone who ever speaks for the Conservative movement… as I watched i thought 'maybe this is just opinion' - not until i saw that he forwarded a book written by a hard progressive and then his own book calling for a move to progressive politics… Watch it and determine for yourself…youtube.com/watch?v=dTjMjSXy30Uyou'll have to add the 'prefix' to the link above…BY Another Opinion on 10/17/2009 at 01:02
Judas Goat Newt "NAFTA" Gingrich is a CFR-member, 33rd Degree Mason, Roman Catholic. He is a key playerin the New World Order.CFR-Member, 33rd Degree Mason, Roman Catholic, NWO NEWT "NAFTA" GINGRICH teamed up with Bilderberger, W.E.F. attendee, MARK SANFORD at Columbia, SC health care conference - May 21, 2009 Will globalists Gingrich and Sanford 'team up' as presidential / vice presidential Republican candidates in 2012 ?www.christianlifean dliberty.net/2009-05-28-CFR-33rd-Mason-RC-NEWT-GINGRICH-with-Bilderberger-WEF-MARK-SANFORD-Columbia-SC-conference-May-21.doc"JUDAS GOAT" CFR-member, 33rd Degree Mason, Pro-Abort Newt "NAFTA-NWO" Gingrich @ CPAC Meeting, February 27, 2009- still misleading uninformed ChristiansWhy is World Net Daily promoting CFR-member, 33rd Degree Mason, NAFTA-supporter Newt Gingrich, False-conservative "Judas-goat," and agent for the New World Order ? "… Mr. Gingrich is numbered among the most ferocious enemies of American sovereignty."Circle of IntrigueBY Steve Lefemine on 10/19/2009 at 17:54
Why, Newt, would you support a Liberal Republican??!! We don't need liberals even IN our party, let alone running in a race. I am shocked that you are not backing the conservative candidate Mr. Hoffman! What are you doing? This country is in deep do-do and you want more of the same kind of so-called leadership? Please support CONSERVATIVE candidates. They'll do far better in the 2010 elections.BY LeAnne Tillar on 10/21/2009 at 15:08
At one time I loved Newt. I still think he has some really good ideas. He had good ideas in '94 and he sold out conservatism for power and prestige. No more for me. I quit the Newt fan club.BY John Coman on 10/22/2009 at 11:11

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
The Washington Independent
"The story of coals dirty, deadly legacy" headlines The Washington Independent this morning. The story relates the political significance, health effects and community impacts of a fossil fuel that reporter Mike Lillis believes has White House's clear embrace.Earlier, Lillis looked at one element of Democrats' forthcoming jobs bill: A proposed unemployment insurance extension. The bill offers jobless Americans an additional three months of aid -- less than what the White House's budget requests, but on par with the House's extention, passed late last year.… Read More »
Red State
Michael Steele's remark this week -- that he has been subject to intense criticism because of his race -- has earned the scorn of Red State's Eric Erickson, who lambasts the Republican National Committee chairman in a blog post published late Tuesday. "Actually, it could have nothing to do with race and everything to do with outsourcing the RNC to the same consultants who have been bleeding the RNC dry for years," he says of Steele's low popularity. "It could have something to do with management styles. It could have everything to do with the Chairman never meeting a shoe he didn’t want to eat."… Read More »
MyDD
Jonathan Singer on Wednesday explores the current state of President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. But with the help of Slate's Doug Kendall, he finds that the president has both nominated fewer and confirmed fewer judges to federal benches than his predecessor at this point in his presidency. Concludes Singer: "But with a real crisis in the judiciary in the form of dozens of vacancies, one has to wonder why this President has nominated fewer than half of the judges nominated by his predecessor."… Read More »
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.