THE HILL
 

Conrad pushes health co-ops; Specter says public option 'gaining momentum'

By Bridget Johnson - 10/18/09 08:32 AM ET

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) held fast to the idea of health insurance cooperatives Sunday while Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) claimed that the public option was going to garner more support than previously expected.

The two Democrats, symbolic of the intra-party disputes that are being hashed out over the specifics of healthcare reform, appeared on "Fox News Sunday" along with Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), who predicted that a government-run public option would be "a very heavy lift" to get through the Senate.

"I will not support any public option tied to Medicare levels of reimbursement," said Conrad, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, when pressed by host Chris Wallace on whether he could back a bill that contained a public option. While repeatedly pressing the idea of health insurance co-ops, Conrad indicated potential compromise in the realm of the public option "trigger" advanced by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine).

"There's at some point a principled compromise," Conrad said.

Specter held fast to the public option when pressed on whether he could accept a bill that didn't include it.

"I'm not prepared to recede at all," Specter said. "I think the public option is gaining momentum. ... I'm not going to step back a bit."

Specter, a former Republican until recently, cited the support of "respectable Republicans" such as former Senate majority leaders Bob Dole (Kan.) and Bill Frist (Tenn.).

Thune stressed, however, that "Republicans reject the idea of government-run healthcare" and predicted that even co-ops would be a "gateway to a government plan."

On "Meet the Press," Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said that the public option stood a good chance of passing and dismissed the notion that Republicans were being excluded from the process, noting that more than half of GOP amendments were accepted during markup.

Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), however, characterized the healthcare reform process as "being written in Harry Reid's office behind closed doors," and speculated that Democrats may offer the public option in a different form to make the package more attractive.

"What are the alternatives here if we do nothing?" Dodd said. "The impact of doing nothing is so much more costly."

On ABC's "This Week," White House senior adviser David Axelrod sounded an optimistic note, saying the administration would get bills passed in both houses, take them to conference and hammer out agreements over the details.

"I think this thing is going to be adjusted as it goes along," Axelrod said.

White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett echoed the optimism on "Meet the Press."

"We are right on the brink of delivering for the American people," Jarrett said.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/63581-conrad-still-likes-health-co-ops-specter-says-public-option-gaining-momentum

Comments (9)

How can Arlen Specter go from being a feckless, pusillanimous Republican to one of the most liberal Democrats pushing government-run health insurance? This is further proof that this weasel has no principles beyond getting re-elected. It's high time Pennsylvania voters send him to his overdue retirement!BY Bob on 10/18/2009 at 12:24
"What are the alternatives here if we do nothing?" Dodd said. "Do you see a repeat pattern here? Can you say "MY WAY OR THE HIHWAY"? This is WHAT WE CAN"T AFFORD? EVERY Last one of these politicians think that we trust them to do the right thing? ..NOT They only need you to VOTE them in office,pay their operating expenses and volunteer more money for their re-election.Their big cash cow is k streeter connections.So, when they say"The impact of doing nothing is so much more costly." you should understand fully what they mean!!?BY GRO on 10/18/2009 at 15:58
Arlen needs to start thinking about what he will do "after Senate". There is no way the good people of Pennsylvania will re-elect this senile, incompetent fool.BY Allie F. on 10/18/2009 at 18:10
Regardless of how any final version of a federal health plan is structured, there should be no forced treatments, no forced purchases, and no enforced debts beyond the cost of a current year's health insurance, including any deductable and copayments. Doctors, lawyers, and others are licensed because they regularly injure and endanger others in the course of their work, and are therefore engaged in intrinsically deceptive and fraudulent occupations since no one who buys anything ever really believes that he or she will be the one who is injured by his or her purchase. Spreading the supposed benefits of the licensed occupations around on a more equal basis is a legitimate part of the same rational by which they are allowed at all, but the people aren't guilty of doing harm merely by being alive, and should not be oppressed.BY rw on 10/18/2009 at 20:18
Much has been said recently regarding the idea that less people will be insured as a result of a federal health plan, presumably based on a right to instant health insurance coverage which, admittedly, is an essential part of any meaningful health insurance reform, and, further, that there will not be enough payers into an imaginary 'health insurance pool' as a result. In fact, the number of payers, and of those receiving benefits in any 'health insurance pool' is always the same, or health insurance would never have been possible in the first place. Subsidizing the poor will add some clients to given insurance companies, while instant coverage may lose some, but it must be up to each insurance company to sell its policies and increase its market share, on its own, without the introduction of any neo-fascist system of forced payments. For more, including some policy suggestions, see my comments on the Jeffrey Young article of 10/1/09.BY rw on 10/18/2009 at 20:38
Bob and Allie, there you go again, calling names,threateni ng,bullying tactics. You don't scare Arlen. He will be back. You sound funny after awhile, America wants something done with health care and it will be done. It is just the way it is folks, jim oBY jim oneil on 10/18/2009 at 22:39
Those that are adamant for government health care are those that typically have there hands out for freebies at the expense of working taxpayers…You know who they are…BY bailedout on 10/19/2009 at 00:36
Welcome to another massive giveaway to illegal aliens. These members should be ashamed but once elected their consciences go south while their wallets go north.BY Carmen Miranda on 10/19/2009 at 07:52
This guy was a dem before he became a Rep before he became a dem. He is only interested in himself. The sooner he is gone, the better.BY PL on 10/19/2009 at 10:28

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.