THE HILL
 

Cheney: Obama 'seems afraid' to make final decision on Afghan troop surge

By Michael O'Brien - 10/22/09 07:34 AM ET

President Barack Obama "seems afraid" to make a decision on how to proceed in Afghanistan, according to former Vice President Dick Cheney.

Cheney, who has been a stringent critic of the new president since leaving office, accusing Obama of "dithering" over a decision in the country.

"Having announced his Afghanistan strategy last March, President Obama now seems afraid to make a decision, and unable to provide his commander on the ground with the troops he needs to complete his mission," Cheney said Wednesday night during a speech at the Center for Security Policy.

"It’s time for President Obama to make good on his promise," the former vice president added. "The White House must stop dithering while America’s armed forces are in danger."

Obama is considering recommendations by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander of troops in Afghanistan, that as many as 40,000 more troops are needed in the country to forestall a failed mission there.

Some Republicans have ramped up the pressure recently on Obama to make a decision on how to proceed in the country more swiftly, though arguably none has been as public or harsh as Cheney.



Cheney also criticized other national security decisions by the successor administration, saying that the president's decision to cancel a missile defense program in Europe represented a "serious blow" to the hopes and dreams of Europeans.

The Bush administration alumnus also said that characterizations of enhanced interrogation programs as torture are "a libel against dedicated professionals who acted honorably and well, in our country’s name and in our country’s cause."


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/64255-cheney-obama-seems-afraid-to-make-afghanistan-call

Comments (20)

Dithering indeed Mr. Cheney. President Obama has no intention of making a decision. He is doing this DELIBERATELY.BY katie on 10/22/2009 at 09:33
Mr. Cheney,Your contempt runs deep, sir, from your unfortunate accident which prevented your to rise as Obama was inagurated to your petulant speeches decrying the current strategy in an attmept to somehow validate the policies ol. It was under your watch that Afghanistan went from bad to worse as the neo-cons put into action their ambitious policies in Iraq after 9/11. You, sir, out of all people do NOT know what is right for this country. A General's request is a General's request, it is up to the civilian leadership of this country to decide if that request will be met. There is no obligation for POTUS to escalate simply because an escalation is requested.BY Brian on 10/22/2009 at 09:56
Ref Quote by Brian:There is no obligation to escalate just because it is requested. However there IS an obligation make a decision. Obama can say no, but he no longer has the luxury of voting "PRESENT".Either protect and support the troops that are there or bring them home, but make a decision. Running to Copenhagen, appearing on Sunday talk shows, attending fund raisers, etc are not so important that they deserve to be put ahead of troops that are in harms way. The bottom line is he is doing everything he can to avoid making a decision and pretending he's too busy to address the problem.BY Joe on 10/22/2009 at 10:27
talk all you want, but remember we have boots on the ground over there that are sitting ducks, make a decision send needed troops now or get all our amercian men and women the [***] out now!!!! You are playing a game of whose is bigger, with amercian lives and that is just wrong. 2012 is sooner than you thinkBY angrycane on 10/22/2009 at 10:40
Brian, Afghanistan went from 'bad to worse' when the American electorate put a 'Marxist' into the White House. You see the rest of the world knew what a large portion of the US did not.The election of Obama emboldened the Taliban. That is why you see an escalation in violence, that is why you see an increase of other nations telling the US what to do. Same thing happened with Carter. Love 'em or hate 'em, Bush,Cheney, were feared by the Taliban. Hated yes, but feared.And heres a little secret for you Brian, they hate Obama too! They just don't fear him.BY Jim on 10/22/2009 at 10:49
Hey, Joe,The last pair that made decisions without doing any actual, you know, Preparation, or maybe even, Thinking Through The Consequences, are the ones who got the U.S. mired in these situations in Iraq and Afghanistan.Thank God the adults are in charge again.BY PBen on 10/22/2009 at 10:49
Shut your trap Cheney - you and King George had 8 years of raping this country and sent it to the brink of financial ruin! You invaded Iraq on BIG lies to the American people - for your profit! You don't give a rats @ss about any of the grunts that die daily because of you King George. Obama is a methodical thinker - he cares a lot about his country, as opposed to you who cares only about making money and raping our country. You should dig a hole and crawl in it -BY Janster on 10/22/2009 at 10:57
Let me get this straight, Obama wants to ram everything through on the domestic side of the equation and says these are emergency and there is no time for debate or even exploring the best possible options, is sitting on the side lines on a matter that could possible mean real loss of life.BY D.P on 10/22/2009 at 11:01
Wait a minute. Isn't this a former administration official criticizing the commander-in-chief in a time of war? What would The Villagers have said had Al Gore criticized George W. Bush nine months into his term? Why is the person who had eight years to work on this problem, and who left it in this shape, seen as having views that are at all legitimate? It astounds me the credibility assigned to Cheney on these matters, and it just plain galls me that nobody points out the totally obvious CONFLICT OF INTEREST that Cheney has on this matter of increased defense spending, given his ties to the industry.BY GenXWho on 10/22/2009 at 11:05
Obama does not defend and protect this country. He is trying to destroy it. I fear he will accomplish what he wants before anyone wakes up. The media is not reporting what is going on because they are in the tank and drinking the Kool-Aide. A sure way to destroy a country is to put them so far in debt , it devalues their currency. Soros is in charge and probably betting against the dollar. Crazy times…people who hate this country are in the highest level of government.BY Sharon Ellis on 10/22/2009 at 11:09

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.