THE HILL
 

McCain supports Obama's planned exec pay cuts

By J. Taylor Rushing - 10/22/09 12:07 PM ET

Senate reaction to an Obama administration plan to restrict executive pay at seven companies that received billions in public bailout money mostly broke along party lines Thursday, with one notable exception — Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Obama’s 2008 rival for the presidency, told The Hill he supported the administration.

The administration's "pay czar," Kenneth Feinberg, plans to cap a months-long review process by announcing the cuts — along with new restrictions on corporate luxuries such as use of private jets, chauffers and even country club membership — at five financial firms and two auto companies. The seven companies are AIG, Bank of America, Chrysler, Chrysler Financial, Citigroup, General Motors and GMAC.

McCain's response: “I have no problem with greed being curtailed."

Most Republicans said just the opposite.

“I have a visceral reaction against so much government involvement in free enterprise,” said Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander (Tenn.)

“It’s a bad precedent,” said Sen. Pat Roberts (Kan.). “You have government determining the pay of a company that may be in the business of trying to get the best employees they can to save the company. It’s very competitive out there. I’m not waving flags for people to get excessive pay or golden parachutes — what I object to is the government making that decision.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/64319-mccain-supports-obamas-planned-exec-pay-cuts

Comments (12)

And you want to know WHY Conservatives stayed home last November. It's better that Obama screw up the country and get the blame, than McCain do the same thing and set the party back 20 years. "Clean House in Washington in 2010"BY Randy  on 10/22/2009 at 13:16
No surprise that McCain would take such a position. How could the Republican party ever have picked such a has-been as a presidential candidate? He deserves our admiration as a hero while in the Hanoi Hilton. Since then, he has done as much to destroy the Republican party as anyone I can think of.BY John Relle on 10/22/2009 at 13:41
Sorry, I thought of John McCain as a poor second choice and his latest illustrates why. Obama was a very poor first choice.Seeing the confusion in D.C., it certainly will be "clean up" time in 2010 if we can hang on until then. Tough, tough, tough, with no good choices. Certainly prayer time is needed in Washington and efforts to put God back into the mix of political life. "Jesus the same, yesterday, today, and forever.A Conservative thinking Democrat (As embarassing as that last word has become!BY Arlie Lawrence on 10/22/2009 at 13:45
Genius move by the genius white house. Make it so all the top talent leaves these companies just when we need them the most. Did I mention the genius behind this decision?Oh, about McCain…forget it.BY rusty on 10/22/2009 at 13:51
McCain is why that idiot Obama barely won the election. If he had been up against a strong and proven conservative, Illinois would still have their "I vote present" junior Senator. I am so sick of this thug that I want to throw up when I see him. Can't stand McCain either!BY Dgleon on 10/22/2009 at 13:58
Once again we are reminded as to why the White House hates all things Fox. When raising the issue about the power of the czars Glenn Beck was lambasted by the Left for being "ridiculous" and "crazy",, so now we learn that the Czars can act on their own with no oversight??? Isn't this (again) just the opposite of what we have been being told? Note to White House - You can only scrub the Internet so much, it's not that hard for us to go back and see what you said last week. Which more often than not turns out to be the opposite of what you are saying this week.BY Patrick Michael on 10/22/2009 at 14:20
I agree wholeheartedly with McCain —- the management of these companies, which drove them into the ground, now expect us, the American taxpayers, to give them raises, bonuses, and perks? For what? For being inept? As far as driving away 'top talent' — the state of these companies indicates that the talent is perhaps not all that 'top'. We, the taxpayers, are also the shareholders in these companies. We have the right and duty to limit the management compensation to reasonable amounts until management performance improves significantly. Afterall, if average workers did their jobs as well as the managers of these companies, not only would they not get raises, they'd be fired. We own those companies -it's not for them to tell us how much of our money they'll be paid. My personal opinion is that they shouldn't receive anything, let alone bonuses, until the companies are profitable and the federal money repaid.BY Dave C on 10/22/2009 at 14:46
Seriously, how many yachts can you water-ski behind? I'm a Republican and a McCain supporter. Why should executives running companies that needed government bailouts spend that money on themselves? I don't want tax dollars padding the salaries and benefits of frat-boy executives who glad-handed their way into positions they don't deserve. I'm a Phi Beta Kappa graduate and a member of Mensa and I had a pay cut myself in my job. If they can't do those jobs for $200,000, call me, I'll do it.BY Eric on 10/22/2009 at 14:52
Dave C, you are spot on. None of this "talent" is worth anything so why should we be subsidizing a big class of failures? Why should anyone get a bonus when they destroyed a firm? Let them go, I don't care. What will they say out the door? " You'll be sorry when you DON'T have a Depression caused by me?" Skrew 'em.BY Unreal on 10/22/2009 at 15:12
All the Republicans are for is big business and small government. Well sometimes government needs to step in and clean up the mess at these large corporations when they request help from the government. They didn't have to accept any of the TARP funds. They knew restrictions were coming about. And as a taxpayer, its ridiculous to see some of these pay packages that are coming to these executives, ESPECIALLY if the taxpayer is going to help them survive. If they don't like it, they can quit because I'm pretty sure there are people out there with just as much experience or better that can take over these companies and bring them to profibility without taking advantage of the market and making risky decisions. Instead of Republicans laying blame and being a "PARTY OF NO" on everything that the Democrats are trying to fix, why don't they offer solutions and work with the Democrats to fix our problems instead of playing politics???Where were the Republicans the last 8 years when Bush was in the WH? Democrats offered solutions then, won the election and is now following up on those solutions as they were elected to do!BY Ricky on 10/22/2009 at 16:10

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Huffington Post
Huffpo's banner headline reads "SATURDAY NIGHT'S ALRIGHT FOR FIGHTIN'" about tomorrow night's first procedural vote in the Senate on healthcare reform legislation. A bill that would allow an audit of the Federal Reserve passed the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. … Read More »
Drudge Report
"10 HRS OF DEBATE SATURDAY; VOTE 8 P.M." banners Drudge about the first procedural vote on the Senate's healthcare reform bll scheduled to take place tomorrow. Drudge links to a release from House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office saying that the Senate bill has a "monthly abortion fee." … Read More »
Buzzflash
Pmcarpenter writes that establishment Democrats are beginning to fret over the gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey. Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) is the blog's "GOP hypocrite of the week" for his House floor speech about the 9/11 civilian terror trials. … Read More »
Firedoglake
Attaturk posts video of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart grilling former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. Blue Texan asks why 2008 presidential candidate and former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) said the war in Afghanistan is lost. … Read More »
RedState
Erick Erickson explores wether or not voting for cloture on healthcare reform is a vote for the bill. A new poll shows Rep. Roy Blunt (R) and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan (D) running close to even in the Show Me State's 2010 Senate race. … Read More »
The Corner
Kathryn Jean Lopez publishes a letter from a National Review donor. Rich Lowry wonders when the "divisive" Crist-Rubio GOP Florida Senate primary will end, saying it is bad for the party. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.