THE HILL
 

Congressman urges Obama to travel to climate conference

By Jordan Fabian - 10/24/09 04:05 PM ET

Rep. Bob Filner (D-Calif.) urged President Barack Obama to travel to the U.N. climate conference in December and advocate for more stringent limits on carbon emissions.

The White House has indicated that the president will not travel to the Copenhagen conference. The summit conflicts with Obama's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in Olso. Senior White House officials suggested that Obama will use that speech to speak about the subject. 

Filner, who sits on the Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, spoke today on a conference call with the Citizens Climate Lobby, a group of environmental activists. He announced that he and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) will circulate a letter in the House next week calling upon Obama to push for a 350 parts per million carbon dioxide limit. Some scientists say the atmosphere's carbon level must return to 350 ppm or less to reverse global warming.

"By agreeing to the goal of 350 ppm," Filner said in the letter, "nations will craft the policies and solutions to meet this challenge, just as America once met the challenge of sending a human being to the moon. And by meeting this challenge we will allow our children and grandchildren to inherit the kind of world that we ourselves have been so blessed to enjoy."

The House passed cap-and-trade climate legislation in June that requires a 17 percent reduction of emissions from 2005 levels by 2020. Counterpart legislation has been introduced in the Senate, but the bill will likely not receive final consideration until 2010.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/64619-congressman-urges-obama-to-travel-to-climate-conference

Comments (14)

Follow the $$$'s. Gauranteed, all of these proponents of climate legislation in the Us, have something to gain financially. Heck, Al Gores pocketed over $100 million! Ask yourself this question: What has that $100 million Purchased? This is the 'speciousness' of the Whole Green Movement, Billions of dollars will go to line the pockets of so called 'leaders' of the movement and 0 dollars will go to actual common sense, substantive change.How far would $100 million dollars have gone towards developing domestic fuel resources or alternative fuel? Or cleaning up environmental hot spots? Nope! $100 million for words, most of them outright fabrications!An thropogenic Global Warming is worse than a lie, it's a Global Scam.BY Jim on 10/25/2009 at 12:41
If Obama can go to Europe in a bid to bring Olympics to Chicago, he certainly better go in a bid to protect the climate and planet. But BEFORE he goes, be better get busy in Washington DC and across the country to help sway sentiment for a fair, ambitious and binding climate treaty. We cannot afford and survive another US dragging its heels and the whole world like Kyoto.BY K dervin on 10/25/2009 at 15:28
The UN IPCC report has been proven to be completely bogus! How can elected officials keep basing legislation off of this report and keep a straight face? And do people not even rationally think about this subject anymore? The same "scientists" saying that man made CO2 caused global warming, said that man made CO2 would cause an ice age 40 years ago! Think people!!! It's about politics, not science. Climate change is a natural cycle that we can't do anything about. It's like trying to stop continental drift.BY AdamC. on 10/25/2009 at 23:26
"Heck, Al Gores pocketed over $100 million!"— What? —Where do you people come up with these strange "facts" of yours? Then your whole rant is based on this flimsy STRAWMAN you hoisted! Please, in the future—at least come up with some viable REAL facts and data to support your assertions. Like these for instance:http://mediamatters.org/mobile/research/200906040051 "The same "scientists" saying that man made CO2 caused global warming, said that man made CO2 would cause an ice age 40 years ago!"— Wrong! — You deniers keep parroting the same lame-brained talking points that have worn out years ago. A COUPLE of scientists theorized particulates reflecting the Sun's rays back out into space in the 70's and in was popularized in the popular media. THAT'S IT. Go and do your research and stop the parroting! And we ARE changing the climate right now above and beyond any natural cycles. DUH!BY Jim Spriggs on 10/26/2009 at 01:20
Jim, maybe you should do some research. I pulled this up in about 2 seconds: "Mathematical proof that there is no “climate crisis” appears today [7-15-08] in a major, peer-reviewed paper in Physics and Society, a learned journal of the 4,600-strong American Physical Society, SPPI reports. Christopher Monckton, who once advised Margaret Thatcher, demonstrates via 30 equations that computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is “climate sensitivity” (temperature increase in response to greenhouse-gas increase), resulting in a 500-2000% overstatement of CO2’s effect on temperature in the IPCC’s latest climate assessment report, published in 2007…Lord Monckton's paper reveals that: *The IPCC’s 2007 climate summary overstated CO2’s impact on temperature by 500-2000%; * CO2 enrichment will add little more than 1 °F (0.6 °C) to global mean surface temperature by 2100; * Not one of the three key variables whose product is climate sensitivity can be measured directly; * The IPCC’s values for these key variables are taken from only four published papers, not 2,500; * The IPCC’s values for each of the three variables, and hence for climate sensitivity, are overstated; * “Global warming” halted ten years ago, and surface temperature has been falling for seven years; * Not one of the computer models relied upon by the IPCC predicted so long and rapid a cooling; * The IPCC inserted a table into the scientists’ draft, overstating the effect of ice-melt by 1000%; * It was proved 50 years ago that predicting climate more than two weeks ahead is impossible; * Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth warmed; * In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years…Addition ally, read the news because the BBC just reported that the Earth hasn't warmed in the past decade!BY AdamC. on 10/26/2009 at 10:53
You people are crazy.Fair enough lose a bet on the horses. But lose a bet on the planet? You really wish to take that chance.Do you know Mr Monckton? Because you trust him implicitly. Or is this to do with money? CO2 does trap heat, go and check. Man does produce CO2, go and check.CO2 is rising in the atmosphere, go and check. The Globe is warming, go and check.The Sun is at a low, go and check.The sea is going acidic, go and check.Big fossil fuel business is lobbying to prevent change, go and check.The ice sheets are melting, go and check.Methane will get released, much worse than CO2, go and check.The worst affects are if the ocean currents fail, go and check.All of the above is either fact, happening now or very difficult to refute.If there is any risk, it is not worth taking, unless you are in the misguided belief that doing nothing is in your own self interest.Simply put, the planet does not need us. We do not have to be here. No-one will worry if we are not.So, take the risk on behalf of us and all of our children that would follow us and be trully damned if you are wrong.BY HELPER on 10/26/2009 at 13:42
There are hundreds of other scientists and numerous other reports that I know of which completely debunk the IPCC report and the notion that we have any significant impact on the climate. I was showing one example of the many that are completely ignored because the truth, as always, is inconvenient to liberal politics. My point is that in a couple of seconds people who actually use their brains can find this information instead of mindlessly repeating liberal propaganda.BY AdamC. on 10/26/2009 at 15:16
Hi Adam, forget reports and opinions, go find some facts. Then make up your own mind, if you are of a free mind and not already otherwise invested in the status quo. We are talking about an industry worth more than the others put together. There is a lot at stake for those in conventional energy, they pay to spread misinformation, so you cannot trust anyone, especially climate change deniers. So, again, what do you consider the facts to be on these, ice sheets, CO2 in the air, methane, sea acid, ocean currents? And you still want to risk everything, why? Clean energy will come in at some point anyway, it will be cheaper and healthier at least. Why to possibly save the planet too? Try answering some direct questions before you just agree with some stranger, either Mr Monckton or me.BY HELPER on 10/26/2009 at 15:52
"forget reports and opinions, go find some facts."—So scientific findings that you don't agree with aren't facts? Interesting. So where do your "facts" about climate change come from? Did you go out and do these studies on your own?BY AdamC. on 10/26/2009 at 17:25
Hi Adam,The point is that you are not assessing the facts for yourself. You are simply trusting to Mr Monckton and his ilk. Perhaps he is right, perhaps not. What is your logical case for believing that climate change will not happen. I will demonstrate a case for clean energy. Modern man produces extra CO2 which would otherwise not exist within the atmosphere, through the burning of fossil fuels on a massive scale. It is true, of course, that nature produces CO2 too, so how do we know that man makes any difference? The ice cores tell us that CO2 is increasing to a point not seen in thousands if not millions of years. It is also rising at a hitherto, unmatched rate. That is fact. Moving on, what is the problem with CO2? Well, it is an insulator. If you go into a lab, set up an experiment, you will see that, it is a fact. So what? Is there any evidence that the planet is warming? Yes, it's debatable, but the Arctic ice pack is undeniably melting and will release methane which is worse than CO2. Glaciers, like the Rouen, are undeniably melting. The earth's land is warming. Ok, so it's within historic boundaries, right? Maybe. What about the Sun? Well, by many measures, including sun spots, it's at a low, so we should be cooling, not warming. Ok, anything else? Well, yes, the oceans are turning acidic. The ocean currents depend on a complex desalination process and these currents are slowing. If they stop, heat does not move around the planet, and a very large disaster occurs where countries, as a whole, cease to be, most live a harder life and some die. Climate shift has happened in the past naturally, we might be causing one unnaturally. Ok, but it'll cost too much? Well, we don't have a spare planet to replace this one with should we screw it up, so any cost can be justified. However, you check the costs for coal, oil, gas and nuclear against clean energy and you will find tha fossil fuels are not cheap, especially when you throw in the removal of subsidies and uncosted health and environmental impacts. There will be work and issues to solve but those industries are tiny and will get more efficient with scale and time. Fossil fuels will run out anyway. What does big business propose? Anything that leaves them in control of profits ie no change or nuclear at a push. Clean energy will mean massive work for all and that means jobs, new cars, new boats, new houses, new planes, new lights etc. Ok, that's a case for moving to clean energy, what is your factually supported argument against clean energy beyond regurgitating Mr Monckton?BY HELPER on 10/26/2009 at 18:38

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.