THE HILL
 

Stupak still unhappy with healthcare reform, abortion provision

By Tony Romm - 10/29/09 04:49 PM ET

The House Democrat leading the charge to alter abortion-related provisions in healthcare reform signaled Thursday his chamber's revised bill still does not go far enough.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) has long threatened to block the House's healthcare effort unless his party's leadership permits a vote on an amendment that would prevent taxpayer dollars from funding abortions -- a provision, he noted on Thursday, that is still absent from Democrats' recently unveiled bill.

"[L]anguage in the bill still does not do enough to prevent federal funding from going to abortion services," Stupak said in a statement. "I am disappointed the Capps Amendment has remained intact in H.R. 3962, mandating abortion services for the first time in our nation’s history.  I will continue to work with leadership to find satisfactory language on this issue."

All eyes have been on Stupak since he announced he had the support of 39 other lawmakers and would scuttle attempts to bring healthcare reform to the House floor unless the Democratic leadership addressed his concerns. Both sides have tried to negotiate that dilemma for some time now, but they have not been able to strike a deal. It is still unclear whether a vote on Stupak's amendment will even take place.

"I'm comfortable with where I'm at," Stupak said on Wednesday, adding Speaker Pelosi was likely angry with him. "This is who I am. It's reflective of my district. If it costs me my seat, so be it."

But Stupak has since tempered his tone, albeit slightly. In an op-ed he submitted to The Hill earlier today, he said the argument that he was trying to kill Democrats' healthcare reform "couldn't be further from the truth."

"This amendment is not about limiting choice when it comes to abortion services. There is nothing in the amendment that prevents those who choose to obtain abortion services from doing so," he said. "The Hyde language simply says taxpayer dollars should not be used to pay for those services.

"Just as the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) does not provide plans that cover abortion services, nor should the plans for individuals who enter into the public option or receive federal subsidies for healthcare cover abortions," he added. "They are free to purchase a supplemental plan or pay for these services with their own money should they so choose."

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/65483-stupak-still-unhappy-with-healthcare-reform-abortion-provision

Comments (16)

Language on page 110 of the new bill (H.R. 3962) explicitly authorizes the "public health insurance option" to pay for all elective abortions. The "public plan" would be a health insurance program operated directly by the federal government, through the Department of Health and Human Services. All funds that will be spent by the public plan will be federal funds, as the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) confirmed, in an October 9 memo obtained by NRLC. Prominent Democrats who have claimed that the federal government could pay for abortion with 'private' funds have been engaged in a big snow job — and in swallowing such a contrived, implausible claim, many journalists have been all too gullible. Douglas JohnsonLegislat ive DirectorNationa l Right to Life Committee202-626-8820BY Douglas Johnson on 10/29/2009 at 18:30
I am proud to be a part of Bart Stupak's district and the fact that he is standing up for not only what he believe to be right, but is representing what many of the people of his district believe is right. Thank You Representative Stupak.BY Nancy Nelson on 10/29/2009 at 21:31
I think the comments of Bishop Michael Burbidge in Raleigh NC match the feeling of many of us pro-life Democrats:"I stand in solidarity with my brother Bishops in stating that genuine health care reform is a moral imperative and a vital national obligation. The Bishops of the country have assured the President and his administration of our desire to work closely with them in reforming health care in a manner that offers accessible, affordable and quality health care for all people, especially the poor, the weak, the immigrant and the vulnerable.“At the same time, we will always insist that health care reform excludes abortion coverage in any form, or any other provisions that threaten the sanctity of human life from the moment of conception to natural death. Are the Bishops of the Catholic Church for genuine health care reform? Yes! Are there any conditions? Yes: the gift of life must be welcomed with love and preserved always at every moment!”http://www.dioceseofraleig h.org/news/view.aspx?id=651BY David S. on 10/29/2009 at 22:02
While Congressman Stupak is posturing to appear as if he cares about the children, in fighting for any "health insurance reform" he is admitting he is for less freedom for those children yet to be born (or aborted). The fact that the Federal Government is even discussing a bill to take over 1/5 of our economy, on top of what they already have done is a testament of the bondage they INTEND for us. Next up… Cap and Trade aka, Cap and Tax. Lord, have mercy on us, sinners all.BY Layne S. on 10/30/2009 at 00:35
Please, Mr. Stupak - Do not let this "one issue" stance get in the way of our much needed health care reform. In a civil society, all of us pay for many things we don't agree with, like the Iraq war. But we do it anyway, because we simply can't function as a society if everyone cherry picks out their pet grievances.BY Dora Keller on 10/30/2009 at 03:06
You're not pro-life so much as anti-abortion. People of means will always have access to abortion. No one WANTS to have one. I don't want to pay for the military industrial complex but I do.BY Bea on 10/30/2009 at 08:30
Douglas Jackson's remarks are false. Language on page 110 of HR 3962 does not explicitly state the public plan will cover all elective abortions. It says that public funding of the plan, through DHHS, will pay for abortions that are currently allowed by law, i.e. the Hyde Amendment. Which prohibits DHHS monies from paying for abortions except in certain cases, rape, incest or endangering the mother's life.Keep this important debate honest.BY Kevin Mc on 10/30/2009 at 13:44
Rep. Stupak, I have contributed to your campaign in the past, and now I regret it. We do not get to hand pick what our tax dollars will pay for, as Dora Keller noted. I shudder that I'm helping to pay for weapons that indiscriminatel y kill people, children included, in far away countries, and I'm sure that there are many in Congress, yourself included, who do too. And yet I don't recall you standing up to block legislation that provides funding for those weapons. That you can turn your back on the people of this nation who will face foreclosure due to medical bills, or serious illness and even death because insurance companies refuse them coverage, is unconscionable. You say you don't care if this stance costs you your seat, but you know very well that it won't, given the district you represent. If anything, it panders to your district and guarantees your reelection. I've always liked and respected you, but you've lost me on this one. I hope you will reconsider and do what's right for the majority of Americans, not for the fervid few.BY Susan Lenfestey on 10/30/2009 at 17:34
Susan…I understood this to be about federally funded abortions - or not. I understood Stupak to just want a provision that abortions (not medically needed) to not be paid for under the government plan. Is there really a problem with that? If someone can't keep the asprin between their knees - why do the rest us us have to pay for their poor judgment?BY Robert - CA on 10/31/2009 at 05:02
I am with Robert on this. I am TIRED of funding things for people without the means forseably - (with my tax money). I wish to help the underpriviliged on my own, it's called charity. And I am NOT willing to fund the killing of a baby under ANY circumstances. There are other alternatives even for medical situations, rape and incest. Look up St Giovanni.BY Laura - Valencia, CA on 10/31/2009 at 15:18

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Huffington Post
Huffpo's banner headline reads "SATURDAY NIGHT'S ALRIGHT FOR FIGHTIN'" about tomorrow night's first procedural vote in the Senate on healthcare reform legislation. A bill that would allow an audit of the Federal Reserve passed the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. … Read More »
Drudge Report
"10 HRS OF DEBATE SATURDAY; VOTE 8 P.M." banners Drudge about the first procedural vote on the Senate's healthcare reform bll scheduled to take place tomorrow. Drudge links to a release from House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office saying that the Senate bill has a "monthly abortion fee." … Read More »
Buzzflash
Pmcarpenter writes that establishment Democrats are beginning to fret over the gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey. Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) is the blog's "GOP hypocrite of the week" for his House floor speech about the 9/11 civilian terror trials. … Read More »
Firedoglake
Attaturk posts video of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart grilling former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. Blue Texan asks why 2008 presidential candidate and former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) said the war in Afghanistan is lost. … Read More »
RedState
Erick Erickson explores wether or not voting for cloture on healthcare reform is a vote for the bill. A new poll shows Rep. Roy Blunt (R) and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan (D) running close to even in the Show Me State's 2010 Senate race. … Read More »
The Corner
Kathryn Jean Lopez publishes a letter from a National Review donor. Rich Lowry wonders when the "divisive" Crist-Rubio GOP Florida Senate primary will end, saying it is bad for the party. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.