THE HILL
 

White House: Data shows stimulus saved, created 650,000 jobs

By Walter Alarkon - 10/30/09 06:38 AM ET

The Obama administration said data released Friday will show the $787 billion stimulus package saved or created about 650,000 jobs this year.

The administration plans to post Friday afternoon on its stimulus website, Recovery.gov, reports submitted by recipients of stimulus money that tally how many jobs the package is responsible for. Administration officials said that the 650,000 jobs number is in line with its own estimates and projections by independent forecasters, such as Moody's and the Congressional Budget Office, that the stimulus has saved or created about 1 million jobs since it was passed in February.

The data doesn't include the thousands of jobs created or saved indirectly, through tax cuts, unemployment benefits, Pell Grants and other payments given through the stimulus.

The data will show the jobs that have directly come from about $150 billion in spending on infrastructure, highway and other construction projects, the administration officials said. About $339 billion in stimulus money has been spent so far.

Republicans have cast skepticism on economic models showing roughly 1 million stimulus jobs, pointing instead to the hard count. Two weeks ago, GOP lawmakers highlighted Recovery.gov reports of stimulus contract recipients showing about 30,000 jobs created or saved from about $16 billion in spending. But Obama administration economists have warned for months that the hard counts would underestimate the number of stimulus jobs because they didn't account for the package's indirect effects.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/65561-stimulus-data-shows-650000-directly-saved-or-created

Comments (19)

That comes to a little over 1 million dollars per job. UNREAL! And Obama administration is bragging about this?Most bizarre!BY Whatajoke on 10/30/2009 at 08:16
I have over 1000 client families. I know of NONE that kept their job due to stimulus money, unless you count local government workers. Since the stimulus is temporary money only, once it is gone, then what? We will automatically lose a million jobs - well, that will be great - move the unemployment rate up several more percent? The public, with 1 in 4 either unemployed or underemployed, is not spending and consumer confidence is falling. Recovery from this severe recession will be very long in coming and not until Americans see the current Congress is on their way out and soon followed by this Presidency.BY Dennis on 10/30/2009 at 09:16
WOW!! These numbers are "according to the OBAMA Administration", which we all know could be, and probably is A LIE". What did the stimulus do? Line the pockets of those that supporter an Usurper-tht's not creating jobs per se, we call that CORRUPTION..BY FRANK COLLATT on 10/30/2009 at 09:26
hehehehe and I still believe in Santa Claus. Why does obama and his thugs lie? Frankie the Commie, billy ayers the terrorist, rev wright I hate America. a,b,c or all the above.BY jake2 on 10/30/2009 at 09:26
How can something that has neither been created or destroyed be saved. Interesting ?…Emo Zipper 10.30.09BY Emo Zipper on 10/30/2009 at 09:43
Lets See spent Billions of dollars to maybe save 1,000,000 jobs…?Obama could have spent a few million requiring E-Verify across the Country for every job and every employer and employee. Freeing up 7-9 million jobs for Americans!Obama could have STOPPED the importing of Foreign labor and saved about 1.5 Million jobs and it would have cost near nothing!Obama could have STOPPED companies from outsourcing jobs across the borders and saved millions of American jobs…In three easy steps Obama could have reversed the unemployment numbers to near normal levels without spending BILLIONS of tax dollars, but instead has allowed Millions of Americans to lose everything.BY HernandezUSA on 10/30/2009 at 10:33
1.2 Million per job. Just a travesty.BY Phil on 10/30/2009 at 10:57
Dismantling AmericaThomas SowellTuesday, October 27, 2009Just one year ago, would you have believed that an unelected government official, not even a Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate but simply one of the many "czars" appointed by the President, could arbitrarily cut the pay of executives in private businesses by 50 percent or 90 percent? Did you think that another "czar" would be talking about restricting talk radio? That there would be plans afloat to subsidize newspapers— that is, to create a situation where some newspapers' survival would depend on the government liking what they publish? Did you imagine that anyone would even be talking about having a panel of so-called "experts" deciding who could and could not get life-saving medical treatments? Scary as that is from a medical standpoint, it is also chilling from the standpoint of freedom. If you have a mother who needs a heart operation or a child with some dire medical condition, how free would you feel to speak out against an administration that has the power to make life and death decisions about your loved ones? Does any of this sound like America? How about a federal agency giving school children material to enlist them on the side of the president? Merely being assigned to sing his praises in class is apparently not enough. How much of America would be left if the federal government continued on this path? President Obama has already floated the idea of a national police force, something we have done without for more than two centuries. We already have local police forces all across the country and military forces for national defense, as well as the FBI for federal crimes and the National Guard for local emergencies. What would be the role of a national police force created by Barack Obama, with all its leaders appointed by him? It would seem more like the brown shirts of dictators than like anything American. How far the President will go depends of course on how much resistance he meets. But the direction in which he is trying to go tells us more than all his rhetoric or media spin. Barack Obama has not only said that he is out to "change the United States of America," the people he has been associated with for years have expressed in words and deeds their hostility to the values, the principles and the people of this country. Jeremiah Wright said it with words: "God damn America!" Bill Ayers said it with bombs that he planted. Community activist goons have said it with their contempt for the rights of other people. Among the people appointed as czars by President Obama have been people who have praised enemy dictators like Mao, who have seen the public schools as places to promote sexual practices contrary to the values of most Americans, to a captive audience of children. Those who say that the Obama administration should have investigated those people more thoroughly before appointing them are missing the point completely. Why should we assume that Barack Obama didn't know what such people were like, when he has been associating with precisely these kinds of people for decades before he reached the White House? Nothing is more consistent with his lifelong patterns than putting such people in government— people who reject American values, resent Americans in general and successful Americans in particular, as well as resenting America's influence in the world. Any miscalculation on his part would be in not thinking that others would discover what these stealth appointees were like. Had it not been for the Fox News Channel, these stealth appointees might have remained unexposed for what they are. Fox News is now high on the administration's enemies list. Nothing so epitomizes President Obama's own contempt for American values and traditions like trying to ram two bills through Congress in his first year— each bill more than a thousand pages long— too fast for either of them to be read, much less discussed. That he succeeded only the first time says that some people are starting to wake up. Whether enough people will wake up in time to keep America from being dismantled, piece by piece, is another question— and the biggest question for this generation.BY larry on 10/30/2009 at 11:01
Your a Liar!BY Larry on 10/30/2009 at 11:01
$150billion for 650,000 jobs should be about 230K per job. Can I get one of them. I see the touted govt efficiencies are really making great strides. And people want the govt to run our healthcare. Amazing. This was not the most effective way to create jobs. How many of them are permanent? How many part time or short term. What a waste and giveaway to Dem causes.BY jschmidt on 10/30/2009 at 11:50

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Huffington Post
Huffpo's banner headline reads "SATURDAY NIGHT'S ALRIGHT FOR FIGHTIN'" about tomorrow night's first procedural vote in the Senate on healthcare reform legislation. A bill that would allow an audit of the Federal Reserve passed the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. … Read More »
Drudge Report
"10 HRS OF DEBATE SATURDAY; VOTE 8 P.M." banners Drudge about the first procedural vote on the Senate's healthcare reform bll scheduled to take place tomorrow. Drudge links to a release from House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office saying that the Senate bill has a "monthly abortion fee." … Read More »
Buzzflash
Pmcarpenter writes that establishment Democrats are beginning to fret over the gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey. Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) is the blog's "GOP hypocrite of the week" for his House floor speech about the 9/11 civilian terror trials. … Read More »
Firedoglake
Attaturk posts video of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart grilling former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. Blue Texan asks why 2008 presidential candidate and former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) said the war in Afghanistan is lost. … Read More »
RedState
Erick Erickson explores wether or not voting for cloture on healthcare reform is a vote for the bill. A new poll shows Rep. Roy Blunt (R) and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan (D) running close to even in the Show Me State's 2010 Senate race. … Read More »
The Corner
Kathryn Jean Lopez publishes a letter from a National Review donor. Rich Lowry wonders when the "divisive" Crist-Rubio GOP Florida Senate primary will end, saying it is bad for the party. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.