THE HILL
 

CBO scores GOP healthcare alternative

By Tony Romm - 11/04/09 10:28 PM ET

House Republicans' healthcare alternative would reduce the federal deficit by almost $70 billion over the next 10 years -- but the proposal would only offer insurance to an additional 3 million Americans, according to a cost analysis of the bill.

The numbers released Wednesday night spell mixed news for Republicans, who touted their amendment -- expected to cost about $61 billion over 10 years-- as more effective than the trillion-dollar bill House Democrats introduced last week.

While the GOP's effort is noticeably cheaper, it pales in comparison to the 36 million uninsured Americans that the Congressional Budget Office previously predicted Democrats' reform could cover.

Some highlights from the CBO analysis:

-- The amendment's tort reform provisions would reduce federal spending on mandatory programs by about $41 billion over 10 years.

-- The GOP's bill could also reduce average premium costs over 10 years, by varying amounts depending on the size of the insurance pool. However, the CBO offers one crucial caveat: Not every American in each insurance category would see a premium decrease. Rather, analysts predict, more cost burden would fall on sicker Americans, or the costs could be hared disparately among states, which means some beneficiaries could see premium increases (while others do not).

-- Finally, the amendment could reduce the deficit by about $18 billion after 2019, according to the CBO score. Still, the office stresses -- much as it did when it scored the House bill -- that projections beyond 2019 are too difficult to state with any degree of certitude.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/66461-cbo-scores-gop-healthcare-alternative

Comments (11)

What a joke… the sick pay too much as it is, and this would make them pay more? How is that supposed to be "reform" and how does that cut costs?BY Mike on 11/04/2009 at 23:47
My comment: Bull. And that goes for the Repub bill the CBO. Repubs can do better, we can't possibly address health care reform w'o deporting illegal immigrants.And uh, just where is the IRS our tax code in all of this? Uh huh. And while the beltway plays politics, looking for new constituents, power, money, the citizens, aka their employers, are ready to fire them. However, the beltway dances on seemingly oblivious to the iceberg they've just seen off the starboard bow."The government that governs, best governs least." Get a clue, Obama/Pelosi nation. NO public option. Get a clue, beltway Repubs. Enforce the law and allow interstate commerce, meaning portability of health insurance.Good grief! I get so tired of constantly of contacting my rep senators. But don't for a minute think that I'll stop calling, writing, explaining to friends, neighbors, family regarding health care, as well as taxation. We WILL kill the tax code, the income tax, the death tax everything associated with it.We WILL see the Fair Tax plan, HR 25 enacted. We WILL return the power to the people, by the people, for the people. The power of the beltway be damned. WE ARE THEIR EMPLOYERS. WE HAVE the POWER.And this is the end of my rant.BY FairTaxer on 11/04/2009 at 23:50
The Dems have $900B to cover 36million and no "drops" for preexisting conditions. The GOP covers 3 million for $61BIL but they DO look out for the all-important big corporate health insurers. The "sick" will pay at higher premium rates. But at least the Republicans didn't create those suggested Leper Colonies, so they should just be Thankful!BY Jay on 11/05/2009 at 01:55
The Sick pay more??? Well no kidding. People who eat more, pay more for food. People who drive more, pay more for fuel, people who buy expensive cars and houses pay more for that insurance, if you are sick, you pay for medical services. The way out of this mess is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY! ! I will take care of me and my family and you can take care of you and your family. Don't take from me via your governmental representatives to pay for your health care.BY Ron117 on 11/05/2009 at 05:15
Just more B.S. for the party of NO to middle class America.BY Jason on 11/05/2009 at 07:28
RON117 - I hope you call your grandmother and tell her those things…damn her and her medicare. I wish she had some "personal responsibility.'BY DJH on 11/05/2009 at 09:41
Okay Ron, so if my child happens to get cancer thru no fault of his own, he should just die because you're so self-centered you refuse to pay a few extra dollars in taxes. Your thinking is what gave birth to Marxism in the first place. The free market system generally does work better than centralized economies, but not EVERY time.BY Kevin on 11/05/2009 at 10:19
Golly, all them elephants huffin' and puffin' to give birth to a mouse. Poor things. Hope they didn't overexert themselves. Might ruin their golf score this afternoon . . .BY John A on 11/05/2009 at 10:22
What the Republican Plan offers is the same status quo. It doesn't ensure more people get insurance, it doesn't stop insurance companies from denying people of pre-exisiting conditions, it doesn't help low income people afford insurance, and it cozies up more to the insurance and health industries. Even the CBO predicts that it will EVEN raise premiums for certain classes. What kind of reform is that? This is not reform.When people get sick and dont have insurance, who pays for it???? The taxpayers and the people who do have insurance because we see that with the costs of premiums rising every year. Why is it that other countries are able to give univeral health coverage to their citizens and we, the most powerful nation on earth can't do that for our citizens??? That is more Un-American to not care for the sick and help those who need coverage and to expand coverage for all.BY Rick on 11/05/2009 at 12:11
The question is, should people go bankrupt because they are sick? Should lives of loved ones be ruined? Nobody is suggesting that healthcare should be free, but it should be reasonable. The CBO report simply cements the Republican's rep as a industry slave. The plan is a joke…uninsure d, bankrupcy…nothing solved other than protecting insurance companies.BY Mike on 11/05/2009 at 15:59

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Huffington Post
Huffpo's banner headline reads "SATURDAY NIGHT'S ALRIGHT FOR FIGHTIN'" about tomorrow night's first procedural vote in the Senate on healthcare reform legislation. A bill that would allow an audit of the Federal Reserve passed the House Financial Services Committee yesterday. … Read More »
Drudge Report
"10 HRS OF DEBATE SATURDAY; VOTE 8 P.M." banners Drudge about the first procedural vote on the Senate's healthcare reform bll scheduled to take place tomorrow. Drudge links to a release from House Minority Leader John Boehner's (R-Ohio) office saying that the Senate bill has a "monthly abortion fee." … Read More »
Buzzflash
Pmcarpenter writes that establishment Democrats are beginning to fret over the gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey. Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) is the blog's "GOP hypocrite of the week" for his House floor speech about the 9/11 civilian terror trials. … Read More »
Firedoglake
Attaturk posts video of Comedy Central's Jon Stewart grilling former CNN anchor Lou Dobbs. Blue Texan asks why 2008 presidential candidate and former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) said the war in Afghanistan is lost. … Read More »
RedState
Erick Erickson explores wether or not voting for cloture on healthcare reform is a vote for the bill. A new poll shows Rep. Roy Blunt (R) and Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan (D) running close to even in the Show Me State's 2010 Senate race. … Read More »
The Corner
Kathryn Jean Lopez publishes a letter from a National Review donor. Rich Lowry wonders when the "divisive" Crist-Rubio GOP Florida Senate primary will end, saying it is bad for the party. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.