THE HILL
 

Pro-lifers praise, pro-choicers condemn Stupak amendment

By Eric Zimmermann - 11/08/09 04:33 PM ET

The nation's leading pro-choice and pro-life groups are squaring off over the passage of an anti-abortion amendment in last night's healthcare bill.

Proposed by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), the amendment would prevent any plans in the proposed health insurance exchange from receiving federal subsidies if they cover abortion.

Here are some selected reactions:

National Right to Life says the amendment is a blow to the Obama administratino's "pro-abortion smuggling operation":

"The Obama White House and top congressional Democratic leaders spent months concealing and misrepresenting provisions that would directly fund abortions through a government plan, and subsidize premiums for private abortion plans.  Today's bipartisan House vote is a sharp blow to the White House's pro-abortion smuggling operation.  But we know that the White House and pro-abortion congressional Democratic leaders will keep trying to enact government funding of abortion, and will keep trying to conceal their true intentions, so there is a long battle ahead."

Planned Parenthood condemns:

“Planned Parenthood condemns the adoption of the Stupak/Pitts amendment in HR 3962 this evening. This amendment is an unacceptable addition to the health care reform bill that, if enacted, would result in women losing health benefits they have today. Simply put, the Stupak/Pitts amendment would restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the private health insurance market, undermining the ability of women to purchase private health plans that cover abortion, even if they pay for most of the premiums with their own money. This amendment reaches much further than the Hyde Amendment, which has prohibited public funding of abortion in most instances since 1977.  

[...]
  
“The Stupak/Pitts amendment violates the spirit of health care reform, which is meant to guarantee quality, affordable health care coverage for all. In fact, this amendment would create a two-tiered system that would punish women, particularly those with low and middle incomes, the very people this bill is intended to assist. The majority of private health insurance plans currently offer abortion coverage, and the Stupak/Pitts amendment would result in the elimination of private abortion coverage in the ‘exchange,’ the new insurance market created under health care reform, as well as in the public option, if one is created.

Family Research Council praises the Stupak amendment but blasts the larger bill:

"This is a huge pro-life victory for women, their unborn children, and families. We applaud this House vote which prohibits the abortion industry from further profiting from taxpayers by using government funds to pay for the gruesome act of abortion. I congratulate the bipartisan coalition that for months has worked to ensure that abortion is not covered in the bill. 

[...[

"Unfortunately, H.R. 3962 is a seriously flawed piece of legislation. The Speaker's bill still allows rationing of health care for seniors, raises health costs for families, mandates that families purchase under threat of fines and penalties, encourages counseling for assisted suicide in some states, does not offer broad conscience protections for health care workers and seeks to insert the federal government into all aspects of citizen's lives. Speaker Pelosi is using the guise of health care reform to push her version of social engineering onto American taxpayers. Additionally, the legislation would place a crushing debt on both current and future generations.

Center for Reproductive Rights calls it an "assault on women's health and rights":

“Tonight’s vote in the House is a stunning assault on women’s health and rights. In a matter of hours, our elected officials have fallen hook, line and sinker for the anti-choice position, dispensing with a credible compromise on abortion and adopting a bill that would leave millions of women worse off than they already are today.

“American women demand that members of the Senate refuse the political bait which sullied the House vote and protect women’s health. Health care reform is supposed to provide affordable health care coverage to all Americans. Yet for women, this legislation gives with one hand and takes away with the other, forcing millions to buy insurance that does not meet all of their medical needs.”

The Susan B. Anthony List urges the Senate to follow suit:

“Tonight the House of Representatives made a principled and politically sound decision to continue our nation’s longstanding policy of protecting taxpayers’ conscience in the area of abortion funding.   We urge the Senate to follow suit.  We will remain vigilant, and shift our efforts to the Senate to ensure that these same pro-life protections are added to the Senate bill.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/66891-pro-lifers-praise-pro-choicers-condemn-stupak-amendment

Comments (26)

Stupak is from my hometown and although I have not voted for him, I will in the future. Planned Parenthood can kiss my gluteous maximus. If a woman chooses to have an abortion, don't expect anyone who believes that life begins at conception to help pay for it. They state that it undermines " the ability of women to purchase private health plans that cover abortion, even if they pay for most of the premiums with their own money. I contend that they free to do whatever they want if they pay for ALL, not "most" of the premiums with their own money. In the meantime, exercise better choices when it comes to sexual activity.BY Phil on 11/08/2009 at 17:14
The above spoken quite eloquently by someone who (given the assumption that Phil means you're male) will never have to make that choice…BY Lauren on 11/08/2009 at 18:19
Abortion is legal. You may not like it, but it is legal. I don't like that may laws that affect life/death issues (such as the death penalty), but iwe all follow the law and work within the system to change things we don't like. One's income level should not affect whether or not a woman has a right to full health coverage benefits if she is able/willing to pay for it. Simple as that. Now, only rich people (often time "pro-life" Republicans) will be able to afford abortion services.BY dave on 11/08/2009 at 18:20
Well said Phil. Restrict access to abortion? Not really. If you want to end your baby's life, don't expect the country to pay for you to do that.BY Randy on 11/08/2009 at 18:27
Pay for abortion up front, or support the child later. I prefer to pay up front. If we deny abortion rights to choose, I think we should make the same choice for cigarette smokers. Chose to smoke? Then deny cancer or heart attack coverage. Sure would help a long way to make a public heath care plan affordable.BY Pete on 11/08/2009 at 18:36
Stupak's amendment is the single most over-reaching and plainly stupid piece of legislation I have ever seen. This legislation is basically telling America's women to just not have unitended pregnancies. Well, sorry but we dont live in that fantasy land. What about rape? what about when birthcontrol fails? what about when the women would lose her life if the pregnancy was carried out? Having access to safe abortion is not a privilege, its a right. If you dont like abortion then dot have one. End of story. Dont try to force your beliefs on other people and take away their right to manage their own body and reproductive freedom. How many women will now die because they couldnt afford access to having a safe abortion? this amendment is so radical and socially ignorant that the country wont stand for it. The Stupak amendment will either be radically altered in the senate or when the two version are reconciled before the President signs. If not then expect to see the consequences of desparate women doing desperate things because their country's leadership has turned their backs on reproductive freedom.BY MIKE on 11/08/2009 at 18:45
Pro-choicers? That's not really a good description. Pro-lifers v. Pro-baby murderers has a better flow.BY AdamC. on 11/08/2009 at 20:49
Well Adamc isn't that an ignorant comment. I do not believe in abortion HOWEVER I believe that I do not have the right to tell someone else they do not have the right to have an abortion. If a women doesn't have an abortion wouldn't you still be paying for it? Because then that women gives that baby up for adoption and then you will spend 18 years paying for the state to take care of that child. So no matter what we will still be paying for an unwanted pregnancy. This bill will not stop people from having abortions (because if you want one you will find a way to have one as seen in many Latin American countries) do to the fact that an unwanted pregnancy is in fact unwanted, therefore it was not planned and is very rarely considered before hand. Some of these women will not die but end up in the hospital, and you again will be paying for it. So the way I see it, we will still be paying for it no matter what we do.BY Rachel on 11/08/2009 at 22:03
Rachel makes a very good point. A child birthed by a woman unprepared to take care of them will most likely be getting a lot of financial aid from the government to support this unplanned child. It's reminds me of what a comedian said that is a not so funny truth. The Right To Lifers say you MUST have that baby! We beside you all the way! After that, you're on your own.BY Dianae on 11/09/2009 at 01:26
Kill your kid if you want, just don't ask me to help you pay for it.BY Whos Right on 11/09/2009 at 04:21

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
Bannered across Drudge this morning is a question most of us in the Beltway have asked about the snow storm Friday: "When will it stop?" Below, Drudge links to an AP article on the recent trouble facing New York Gov. David Paterson (D), who many thought was about to be rocked by political scandal by a forthcoming story in The New York Times. That story hasn't arrived -- but speculation about its contents surely has -- leading Paterson to say he would depart office only as a result of the ballot box, or if he's carried out "in a box."… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"KEEP TRYING" -- That's the message one HuffPo writer took from the latest WaPo/ABC poll, which showed 63 percent of Americans still favored further action on healthcare reform. Additionally, Ryan Grim posts his recent interview with Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who predicted his chamber's historic filibuster could "fall of its own weight -- it should fall of its own weight -- or it will fall after some massive conflict on the floor, which has happened in the past where there have been rulings from the chair that have led to reform."… Read More »
The Corner
The Corner's Mark Krikorian points out in a recent post that the private sector -- namely, the National Review -- was able to devise how many immigrants were residing within the United States faster than the U.S. government could produce that data. And offering further proof that former Gov. Sarah Palin's (R-Alaska) crib notes have become something of a political meme is Kathryn Jean Lopez, who notices a famous country singer penning notes on his hand.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
"The story of coals dirty, deadly legacy" headlines The Washington Independent this morning. The story relates the political significance, health effects and community impacts of a fossil fuel that reporter Mike Lillis believes has White House's clear embrace.Earlier, Lillis looked at one element of Democrats' forthcoming jobs bill: A proposed unemployment insurance extension. The bill offers jobless Americans an additional three months of aid -- less than what the White House's budget requests, but on par with the House's extention, passed late last year.… Read More »
Red State
Michael Steele's remark this week -- that he has been subject to intense criticism because of his race -- has earned the scorn of Red State's Eric Erickson, who lambasts the Republican National Committee chairman in a blog post published late Tuesday. "Actually, it could have nothing to do with race and everything to do with outsourcing the RNC to the same consultants who have been bleeding the RNC dry for years," he says of Steele's low popularity. "It could have something to do with management styles. It could have everything to do with the Chairman never meeting a shoe he didn’t want to eat."… Read More »
MyDD
Jonathan Singer on Wednesday explores the current state of President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. But with the help of Slate's Doug Kendall, he finds that the president has both nominated fewer and confirmed fewer judges to federal benches than his predecessor at this point in his presidency. Concludes Singer: "But with a real crisis in the judiciary in the form of dozens of vacancies, one has to wonder why this President has nominated fewer than half of the judges nominated by his predecessor."… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.