THE HILL
 

Nelson 'highly unlikely' to support Senate bill without abortion clause

By MIchael O'Brien and Jeffrey Young - 11/09/09 03:23 PM ET

A key Senate centrist is "highly unlikely" to support any heath bill without an abortion provision similar to the House's Stupak amendment.

A spokesman for Sen. Ben Nelson (Neb.) said the centrist Democrat was pleased by the amendment, offered by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), which was included in the House health reform legislation to restrict federal funding for abortions.

"Sen. Nelson is strongly pro-life and was pleased the Stupak amendment passed with such strong support," said Nelson spokesman Jake Thompson. "He believes that no federal money — including subsidies or tax credits — should be used to buy insurance coverage for abortion."

Thompson cautioned as well that Senate Democratic leaders may lose Nelson's support, which they have courted assiduously, without a provision in the Senate bill similar to the Stupak amendment.

"This is a very important issue to Sen. Nelson and it is highly unlikely he would support a bill that doesn’t clearly prohibit federal dollars from going to abortion," Thompson said.

Liberal Democrats and abortion-rights supporters in the House have demanded that the Stupak amendment be stripped during conference with Senate leaders over their own bill. If the Senate were to include such language, though, it would make stripping the amendment even more difficult during conference.

Nelson is one of a few centrist Democrats whom leaders need to be on board in the Senate to stave off a potential Republican filibuster of the bill. Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) has already threatened to filibuster the bill if it contains the public option.

The abortion provisions threaten to reignite a fracture between liberal and centrist Democrats in Congress, a rift that has been on display over the public option and has more prominently manifested over abortion as of late.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/67007-ben-nelson-highly-unlikely-to-support-senate-bill-without-abortion-restrictions

Comments (6)

I commend Senator Nelson for standing up for his principals. The problem is that the rest of the Democrats who were pro-choice voted for the House Bill anyway with the anti abortion Stupak Amendment in it. They through their principals out the door and in the process threw women under the bus. The fact they think that the Stupak provision can be taken out in the Senate House Conference shows just how dishonest they are. Bottom line, no one can trust politicians and government to keep their promises. Just like old people are being thrown under the bus with the enormous cuts to Medicare so are women being thrown under the bus. God help us all if this horrendous Bill is passed and we all become subjects of a bunch of politicians who have no principals and can never be counted on to keep their promises.BY James on 11/09/2009 at 16:46
These self-serving Democrats got what they deserve for ditching the public option and negotiating in BAD faith. This is what happens when you cave. Nice going.BY tropicgirl on 11/09/2009 at 16:55
I'll tell you what Sen. Nelson thinks about women. I live in Nebraska, and I called his DC office this morning to explain how I was impregnated by rape, and how important it is to ensure that poor women who become pregnant because they're raped aren't forced to endure a pregnancy. Nelson's aide hung up on me. And that's what Ben Nelson thinks about women. And if Nelson doesn't care about the women who have suffered in his state, imagine how little he thinks about everyone else.BY Peggy on 11/09/2009 at 17:36
I believe the above story about the call to Nelson's office about as much as I believe in Santa Claus.BY DEMSDOOMEDIN2010 on 11/09/2009 at 19:01
This is not about abortion. This is about prying the hands of insurance company executives away from the necks of Americans and Nelson knows it. He may be pro-life for the unborn, but he's a killer of those babies in desperate need of health care right now whose parents have been priced out of the market or lost their insurance because they have lost their jobs. What a pompous, pampered jerk. Vote him out next time around.BY Connie Snyder on 11/09/2009 at 19:52
Senator Nelson "Highly Unlikely" to be Voted in Next Election.And what of the babies that are already here and have NO health care insurance because their parents are jobless or whose company doesn't offer insurance or are forced out of the market to the high cost of private insurance. Do they count in your pampered poodle world, Senator?BY Connie Snyder on 11/09/2009 at 19:56

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
Bannered across Drudge this morning is a question most of us in the Beltway have asked about the snow storm Friday: "When will it stop?" Below, Drudge links to an AP article on the recent trouble facing New York Gov. David Paterson (D), who many thought was about to be rocked by political scandal by a forthcoming story in The New York Times. That story hasn't arrived -- but speculation about its contents surely has -- leading Paterson to say he would depart office only as a result of the ballot box, or if he's carried out "in a box."… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"KEEP TRYING" -- That's the message one HuffPo writer took from the latest WaPo/ABC poll, which showed 63 percent of Americans still favored further action on healthcare reform. Additionally, Ryan Grim posts his recent interview with Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who predicted his chamber's historic filibuster could "fall of its own weight -- it should fall of its own weight -- or it will fall after some massive conflict on the floor, which has happened in the past where there have been rulings from the chair that have led to reform."… Read More »
The Corner
The Corner's Mark Krikorian points out in a recent post that the private sector -- namely, the National Review -- was able to devise how many immigrants were residing within the United States faster than the U.S. government could produce that data. And offering further proof that former Gov. Sarah Palin's (R-Alaska) crib notes have become something of a political meme is Kathryn Jean Lopez, who notices a famous country singer penning notes on his hand.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
"The story of coals dirty, deadly legacy" headlines The Washington Independent this morning. The story relates the political significance, health effects and community impacts of a fossil fuel that reporter Mike Lillis believes has White House's clear embrace.Earlier, Lillis looked at one element of Democrats' forthcoming jobs bill: A proposed unemployment insurance extension. The bill offers jobless Americans an additional three months of aid -- less than what the White House's budget requests, but on par with the House's extention, passed late last year.… Read More »
Red State
Michael Steele's remark this week -- that he has been subject to intense criticism because of his race -- has earned the scorn of Red State's Eric Erickson, who lambasts the Republican National Committee chairman in a blog post published late Tuesday. "Actually, it could have nothing to do with race and everything to do with outsourcing the RNC to the same consultants who have been bleeding the RNC dry for years," he says of Steele's low popularity. "It could have something to do with management styles. It could have everything to do with the Chairman never meeting a shoe he didn’t want to eat."… Read More »
MyDD
Jonathan Singer on Wednesday explores the current state of President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. But with the help of Slate's Doug Kendall, he finds that the president has both nominated fewer and confirmed fewer judges to federal benches than his predecessor at this point in his presidency. Concludes Singer: "But with a real crisis in the judiciary in the form of dozens of vacancies, one has to wonder why this President has nominated fewer than half of the judges nominated by his predecessor."… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.