THE HILL
 

Abortion rights group to Stupak: 'Yup, we're playing with fire'

By Jordan Fabian - 11/17/09 06:15 PM ET

A prominent abortion rights group is encouraging its members to call senators to express their opposition to the inclusion of abortion restrictions similar those in the House's healthcare reform bill. 

NARAL Pro-Choice America President Nancy Keenan wrote an e-mail to supporters warning them of Rep. Bart Stupak's effort to reach out to senators to include an amendment similar to his in the Senate bill. Stpuak (D-Mich.) amended the House bill to prevent plans in the proposed health insurance exchange and public option from paying for abortion coverage. 

Keenan struck back against Stupak's remarks last week that abortion rights activists are "playing with fire." The subject line of Keenan's e-mail is "yup, we're playing with fire."

"The man behind the ban passed in the House, Rep. Bart Stupak, is using his victory to embolden anti-choice senators," Keenan wrote. "If Rep. Stupak wins, women lose. If we win, women win. It's that clear cut."

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has said that she has the votes to block the inclusion of the Stupak language in the Senate bill. 60 senators would need to vote to strip the Senate bill of its current abortion language and replace it with Stupak's. 

Keenan's letter, however, shows that abortion rights activists are still concerned that the amendment may still be included in the Senate bill.

The addition of Stupak's language to the Senate bill could spark a fight within the Senate Democratic Caucus over the health bill. Stupak's language played a key role in attracting the support of anti-abortion rights Democrats who voted for the final House bill, which passed 220-215.

Some view the language's inclusion in Senate bill as necessary to attract the 60 votes necessary to invoke cloture.

But abortion rights Democrats have criticized the bill, saying it restricts access to abortions under private plans as well. A bloc of about 40 House Democrats led by Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) have said they would oppose a final bill should it include the Stupak language.

"We must win in the Senate to keep women from losing their private insurance coverage for abortion in the new health-care system," wrote Keenan, touting a petition the group sent to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) that attracted over 97,000 signatures.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/68211-abortion-rights-group-to-stupak-yup-were-playing-with-fire

Comments (33)

Pay for your own abortions…why is that so unreasonable for liberals to accept. The majority of American taxpayers do not want to pay for you to kill a child. The amendment does not attempt to reverse Roe vs Wade. You are legally still allowed to kill your baby…we just don't want to pay for it. It's that simple.BY R.T. on 11/17/2009 at 19:02
Amen R.T. I certainly do not want my hard-earned money used to kill an innocent and defenseless baby.BY LIAMD2 on 11/17/2009 at 19:26
Responding to the rhetoric of R.T. and LIAMD2, the vast majority of liberals and progressives and a slimmer majority of Americans generally do not recognize a fetus as a child.Abortion is a perfectly legal medical procedure in all of the states, territories and protectorates of the U.S. I can understand that a significant percentage of Americans have moral objections to the procedure and that is the reason Federal funds are currently restricted from being used for abortions.The language of the Stupak Amendment is overbroad and would inhibit PRIVATE insurance companies from providing coverage for abortions. This is an unacceptable alteration of the status quo.BY Van Carter on 11/17/2009 at 20:05
Well-reasoned and stated, Mr. Carter. Kudos also for having the character to put your name to your words. Too few people on forums like these have the honor or courage to own their words.BY John Judy on 11/17/2009 at 20:25
i am not paying for someone to commit murder if they pass this bill it's against my religionit's against my consciousand there is no way in [***] some idiot far left wing nut is going to tell me how to spend my moneys*^% them all.BY da verg on 11/17/2009 at 20:27
Mr. Carter…It's not rhetoric. I do not wish to pay for some other woman's abortion. No where in the amendment does it state that a woman cannot go out and have an abortion. She will just not be able to use the tax payer's government insurance plan to do it. It is offensive enough that the lazy a** liberals in this country expect the hard working Americans to keep pay for their entitlement programs but now you want us to pay for your healthcare and abortions. Really?? Pay for your own lifestyles and take responsibility for your own choices. Goodness…my five yr old takes more responsibility for his own actions than most liberal adults.BY R.T. on 11/17/2009 at 20:56
And another point…it is your right to believe that a fetus is not a child. But it is my right to believe that it is and it should be my right not to have to pay to kill what I believe to be a child. See…you keep your beliefs and pay for it and I'll keep my beliefs.BY R.T. on 11/17/2009 at 20:59
Mr. Carter you need to be a little careful when trying to prove your point. Mainly you should have stated that only those private companies that receive federal dollars would be blocked from paying for abortions. I am sure that it was an oversight on your part and not an attempt to misinform people.BY Marc on 11/17/2009 at 21:15
You commentators might as well save your breath. Obama will get his way and have taxpayer paid abortions as well as free care for all illegal immigrants. You have to remember that this was a man who turned down paying anything towards medical care for aborted fetuses who survived the trauma of abortion. Like most Americans ,I'm all for a woman's right to choose, but not by me. But Obama does not care. What can one expect from a failed community organizer from the south side of Chicago? That area is the standard of harmony civility now isn't it?BY Phil on 11/17/2009 at 21:16
Mr. Carter,Many people also are alcoholics and are abusive to their family, but that doesn't make that right either. I don't recognize you as a moral human being if you "don't recognize a fetus as a child". Your language is deceptive too as just because a slim, very slim, number of people believe abortion should be legal, it does not mean they think it is moral. You find a stark contrast in polling between what people think should be legal and what they think is moral. My guess is your knew that, but you were attempting to deceive people with your heartless, cruel words and beliefs. At one time in this country a majority of people believed slavery was okay too because they though black people weren't the same as white people. Your thinking places you right smack in this amoral camp.BY Andrew on 11/17/2009 at 21:31

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
Bannered across Drudge this morning is a question most of us in the Beltway have asked about the snow storm Friday: "When will it stop?" Below, Drudge links to an AP article on the recent trouble facing New York Gov. David Paterson (D), who many thought was about to be rocked by political scandal by a forthcoming story in The New York Times. That story hasn't arrived -- but speculation about its contents surely has -- leading Paterson to say he would depart office only as a result of the ballot box, or if he's carried out "in a box."… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"KEEP TRYING" -- That's the message one HuffPo writer took from the latest WaPo/ABC poll, which showed 63 percent of Americans still favored further action on healthcare reform. Additionally, Ryan Grim posts his recent interview with Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who predicted his chamber's historic filibuster could "fall of its own weight -- it should fall of its own weight -- or it will fall after some massive conflict on the floor, which has happened in the past where there have been rulings from the chair that have led to reform."… Read More »
The Corner
The Corner's Mark Krikorian points out in a recent post that the private sector -- namely, the National Review -- was able to devise how many immigrants were residing within the United States faster than the U.S. government could produce that data. And offering further proof that former Gov. Sarah Palin's (R-Alaska) crib notes have become something of a political meme is Kathryn Jean Lopez, who notices a famous country singer penning notes on his hand.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
"The story of coals dirty, deadly legacy" headlines The Washington Independent this morning. The story relates the political significance, health effects and community impacts of a fossil fuel that reporter Mike Lillis believes has White House's clear embrace.Earlier, Lillis looked at one element of Democrats' forthcoming jobs bill: A proposed unemployment insurance extension. The bill offers jobless Americans an additional three months of aid -- less than what the White House's budget requests, but on par with the House's extention, passed late last year.… Read More »
Red State
Michael Steele's remark this week -- that he has been subject to intense criticism because of his race -- has earned the scorn of Red State's Eric Erickson, who lambasts the Republican National Committee chairman in a blog post published late Tuesday. "Actually, it could have nothing to do with race and everything to do with outsourcing the RNC to the same consultants who have been bleeding the RNC dry for years," he says of Steele's low popularity. "It could have something to do with management styles. It could have everything to do with the Chairman never meeting a shoe he didn’t want to eat."… Read More »
MyDD
Jonathan Singer on Wednesday explores the current state of President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. But with the help of Slate's Doug Kendall, he finds that the president has both nominated fewer and confirmed fewer judges to federal benches than his predecessor at this point in his presidency. Concludes Singer: "But with a real crisis in the judiciary in the form of dozens of vacancies, one has to wonder why this President has nominated fewer than half of the judges nominated by his predecessor."… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.