THE HILL
 

Dem lawmakers want answers on health insurance rates

By Mike Soraghan - 11/18/09 02:58 PM ET

More than 100 Democratic lawmakers are demanding that the health insurance industry explain reports that companies are raising rates sharply in advance of President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul.

The industry has already drawn the ire of Democratic legislators during the healthcare debate, most notably when its trade association, America's Health Insurance Plans, released a study critical of healthcare legislation the day before a key committee vote.

The letter is addressed to the trade group and its president and CEO, Karen Ignani. The letter says insurers are proposing to increase premiums for customers across the country by an alarming 15 percent, double the rate of increase from last year. It says such increases will stunt job creation and economic growth as the nation tries to dig itself out of a recession.

"Small businesses and hard-working Americans deserve to know why they will be subjected to such unusual and significant increases in health care premiums," the letter said, "and we ask that you submit to Congress a detailed explanation of the planned rate hikes."

The insurance group responded that the increases are in line with the rising costs of medical care, and say changes are needed in the system to bring down costs.

“According to the federal government, premium increases mirror increases in the cost of medical services," AHIP spokesman Robert Zirkelbach said in a statement. "In every state, health plans must provide actuarial justification for any changes in premiums. To make health care more affordable and put the system on a sustainable path, reform must address the root causes of rising medical costs.”

AHIP criticized the House-passed version of the bill, saying that it failed to contain costs, or "bend the cost curve," and that the public health insurance option in the bill would cause millions of people to lose their existing coverage.

AHIP commissioned a study of a Senate Finance Committee version of the bill that said there were several provisions that could cause people's insurance premiums to rise. Critics said the study ignored other aspects of the bill that would lower premiums.

The letter, spearheaded by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), the head of the business-minded New Democrats, has the signatures of 88 House members and 31 senators, according to a Democratic aide.

Text of the letter after the jump:


November 18, 2009
Karen Ignagni
President & CEO
America’s Health Insurance Plans
601 Pennsylvania Ave
South Building, Suite 500
Washington, DC, 20004
Dear Ms. Ignagni,
We read with great concern the October 24, 2009 New York Times article, “Small Businesses Face Sharp Rise in Costs of Health Care.” The article raises serious allegations about whether insurance companies are raising rates in anticipation of health reform being enacted by President Obama and Congress.  Small businesses and hard-working Americans deserve to know why they will be subjected to such unusual and significant increases in health care premiums, and we ask that you submit to Congress a detailed explanation of the planned rate hikes.
As you know, next year, health care providers are proposing to increase premiums for customers across the country by an alarming 15 percent—double the rate of increase from last year. For America’s small businesses, this means the annual premium per employee will have risen from $4,500 in 2008 to $5,500 in 2010 – an increase of $1000 per employee in just two years.  Small businesses are the backbone of the U.S. economy, accounting for approximately 80% of net new jobs created.  During this economic downturn, they cannot be expected to absorb such skyrocketing costs without negative consequences for job creation and business growth.
Already, the number of employers providing insurance to their workforce is slipping.  For example, over the last ten years, the percentage of small businesses (with fewer than ten workers) offering health benefits has dropped from 56 percent to 46 percent. If we continue on the current path, U.S. businesses – large and small – will have to choose between reducing benefits or making layoffs in an effort to stay competitive with foreign competitors.  Without health care reform, small employers are on track to pay nearly $2.4 trillion for health care in the next 10 years.  As a result, one in five employers is expected to stop offering health benefits within the next five years.  The employer-sponsored health insurance of millions of employees and their families is at stake.
U.S. businesses and hard-working Americans are struggling enough to make ends meet. Clearly, they cannot afford baseless premium hikes.  That is why it is so important for you to explain the cause for these premium hikes.  We look forward to your response and to getting to the bottom of this issue.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/68411-dem-lawmakers-want-answers-on-health-insurance-rates

Comments (7)

And this is a surprise this happened???????????BY Chipchick on 11/18/2009 at 15:21
Guess what small business men and women? Next time you find your costs go up and raise rates you'll end up getting a letter from the "progressive" Democratic Congress or maybe Barry Soetoro (Obama's real name) himself asking you to explain why and then the threats and arm twisting will come after that. These people's agenda is simple: Harass every legitimate business in every industry and impose massive, impractical regulations on them so they eventually go under. Then the government comes in and blames it all on your business and demands control over your industry. They've done it to Auto, Finance, OilGas, Housing, and now they are going after healthcare! When will you people wake up?!?!BY Andrew on 11/18/2009 at 15:26
The insurance companies won't admit this is to cover the gap between being required to cover pre-existing conditions and having coverage mandated for every American, so they'll probably blame reduced insurance contributions due to increased unemployment or delayed care by the unemployed that is expected to result in increased care as those people return to work. What I wonder is why wouldn't the insurance companies be even more likely to increase premiums when we're all legally required to purchase insurance? Adding everyone into a pool that was already financially unsustainable just doesn't make sense.BY Richard on 11/18/2009 at 16:26
Health care and drugs have been rising thru the roof in the anticipation of government run health care.If they are getting paid by our federal system the way we are spending money,they will need a back up in cash.Thanks to this bill,rates are going out of site.We may have to cutback on what we give our employees in Washington.BY rick on 11/18/2009 at 16:31
For those who want to blame the government for the sharp increase in insurance rates, all I can say is that you're thinking is twisted. If you want to place blame, place it on the source and that is not the dems or any part of government.BY andreams on 11/18/2009 at 16:33
With a negative growth rate for the economy they want a 15% increase in premiums, gee I wonder if they price gouging … Ya Think?????BY Negative CPI on 11/18/2009 at 23:55
It is clear that those who are for this bill have a poor grasp of economics, and no business sense what so ever. There are clear examples of what the consequences are by government meddling in health insurance, just look at the failed experiments in Tennessee (TennCare), Kentucky and Massachusetts, where insurance rates have risen, perverse incentives have occurred (disincentives for personal income growth and business growth), longer wait times to see medical professionals, and GREATER cost to government to pay for healthcare. These are facts, not supposition. If Republicans are the party of "No", then realize that the "No" is in answer to the poor current proposal, and not reform. And realize that none of the proposals get at the underlying cost issues; health insurance costs are not the same as medical care costs. And actuarially speaking, the idea that insurance would be the same or less to pay for more care is absurd. It appears that the government care of education has failed the majority of the population with simple math. Don't allow them to fail the United States with health care. Vote NO to this proposal and VOTE YES for real solutions.BY John S on 11/19/2009 at 12:00

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.