THE HILL
 

RNC weighs new message strategy in '10

By Tony Romm - 11/23/09 11:27 AM ET

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele hinted his party was assembling a set of guiding principles in time for 2010 on Monday.

While Steele cautioned this morning it would not be a "Contract with America II" -- a sequel to the document Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) successfully introduced in 1994 -- he did suggest the RNC was plotting some larger message strategy that had similar goals in mind.

"The Contract with America stands on its own. It was right for that time. It helped define that moment," the chairman told CNN in an interview.

"I and Newt and others are looking at how we define this time, a time where we have an administration that's overstepping its reach on healthcare, overstepping its reach on the economy," Steele added, then asking rhetorically, "how do we principally make the argument, make the case to the American people that the direction the Obama administration, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid want to go is not good for America?"

"I think we'll have some very interesting things to say next year about that," he said.

Steele provided no additional specifics, including what policy principles that guiding document might ultimately include.

Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for party leaders to shape their candidates' campaigns around media-friendly policy messages.

Most recently, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in 2006 debuted her "100-Hour Plan" --  a set of legislative goals announced before that year's elections that Democrats promised to meet within 100 legislative hours.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69115-rnc-weighing-new-message-strategy-in-2010

Comments (12)

You have something like this, RNC. It's called the party platform. Maybe you should start following it.- Angry RepublicanBY Victor on 11/23/2009 at 12:24
"How do we principally make the argument"Maybe you should talk to the one Republican, who the GOP likes to conveniently ignore, that has always voted in protection of the Constitution?I don't even need to name him. :)BY JoshLowry on 11/23/2009 at 13:17
No credibility comes from a party with the same RINO warmongering GWB leaders such as a Newt Gingrich and a Michael Steele etc. The original "conservatives" were against big government and preemptive undeclared wars. These same people worked diligently with GHWB and GWB to bring our nation to its knees. Obama was then elected on a platform of "Change." Americans were wanting rid of GWB and these same scoundrels who said that they represent the original conservative party , yet they came in and overthrew the old conservatives and felt the need to bring in with them a NEW name to boot! They now called themselves "Neoconservative s" or "Neocons" meaning: "New Conservatives." These same Newts and Steeles have a new label now that isnot self imposed or to their liking. Their NEW name is that of "RINO" meaning "Republicans In Name Only." These people donot stand for the conservative and original republican principles of a smaller government and of the US government serving the american peoples. The RINOs platform is for large government dictating the rights of the people, while saying that they donot. RINOs donot believe nor follow the US contitutions Rules of Law all while stating that they do. RINOs as evidenced by their actions believe that the end justifies the means while stating this isnot true. RINOs are wrapped in the US flag while they spy on americans and infringe upon citizens rights while stating that it is to keep the terrorists from attacking us. RINOs believe that lying to the american people in order to invade other countries premptively is justified as long as they tell us that it is to keep the terrorists from attacking us on our own soil, again for your own good to "Keep Americans Safe. I won't even get into the dangerous wide open borders of our country that their "terrorists" could cross over on a whim. RINOs believe in the military Industrial complex and the use of Fearmongering is utilized as a necessary tool in order to reach their desired result no matter the mass casualties of which their actions bring about. GWB brought us the "patriot act" which isnot patriotic at all. It deems anyone who doesn't agree with the US governments policies whether foreign or an american citizen then you can be considered a terrorist. Remember RINO GWBs statement after invading Iraq in which he stated,"You are either with us or you are with the terrorists." Of course this couldnot have been further from the truth. This tool of using blind patriotism has been utilized by many dictators in other countries and is most effective. Now I will get back to discussing the presidency of Obama. Obama was voted into office b/c americans thought that change would be inevitably brought forth and we could rid ourselves of the putrid former way things were done by the past administration of GWBs and the Newt Gingriches of the RINO party. If you will care to pay attention, the same policies are still are retroactive and in effect. This includes the same unconstitutiona l Patriot Act that Obama was going to get rid of and didn't and won't, the same unconstitutiona l signing statements to overrule the US constitution that he said he would never use and does, the continued wiretapping and spying on law abiding citizens, bailing out of the same privately owned federal reserve banking cartel that has caused devastation to our economy, All bankers in GWBs administration are the same bankers in the Obama administration and still looting our people, Spending is overtly rampant, local police are being federalized and no longer are there to protect and serve but are to serve big governments interest, cameras on every street corner, cancelled Posse Comatatus act, guilty until proven innocent, the same military leaders from GWBs administration at attention and still in place and the list goes on and on etc… There will be NO CHANGE until We as americans demand and take it back. The american population has been "Conditioned" that BLUE is different than RED.Our nation consists of only 2 parties that are deemed by the US Government and the owned propaganda media as being a "viable" conduit for any successful candidate to have even a chance for being elected to office. Both Government and Media have worked tirelessly in order to make this so. So now we have a staged platform of "Good" cop vs "Bad" cop where the main objective is that one of the selected "candidates" that have been backed by corporations lobbyist as well as the monies sent into each respective RED or BLUE, Elephant or Donkey sham official party platform by the donations of its citizenry among many other top organisations. Please let us get back to being americans first and let the illusion of the 2 party labeling false system die once and for all. May God Bless Americans!BY Sid on 11/23/2009 at 13:30
This initiative by the RNC is very much needed, as Republican Party leaders in Congress seem to be excessively buffeted by well-funded special interests so their policy pronouncements are conflicting and muddled. For example while the Democrats run up massive deficits in order to buy votes, Republicans refuse to promise to balance the budget if elected. Therefore what is the Republican policy on the deficit? PS: I’ve read that China is not a signatory to the "Agreement on Government Procurement" (GPA), which reportedly allows them to protect much of their economy from foreign competition. This is because most Chinese companies are considered state-owned, allowing them to protect much of their economy as needed. Therefore what’s the Republican policy?BY Chris Baker on 11/23/2009 at 13:43
Chris Baker-The republicans and the democrats policy of selling the American peoples very own land and interests to the foreign control of other nations is what both parties policies are and have been for quite a very long time. Neither has any loyalty to the people that they are supposed to represent. Their loyalty is to special interests at the peoples expense and both parties are and should be held accountable.BY Kenneth on 11/23/2009 at 15:04
The Democrats have labeled Republicans the party of NO. Yet with each minute moving forward, the approval ratings for the President and (this foul smelling) Congress continue to plummet. As witnessed by Town Hall rancor, Tea Parties, marches to DC and recent election results, I'd proudly say the American people are in complete agreement with Republicans on this one, The People are WITH the party when it comes to this bill, NO!BY Steve D on 11/23/2009 at 17:08
This is a joke, right? I mean, literally, the Republican Party is a joke. … "I and Newt and others" = incorrect grammar. These people want America to be run by idiots. We all know how well THAT worked out. I'm with Sid, May God Bless ALL Americans, even the incredibly stupid, gullible ones (aka Republicans).BY Ethan on 11/23/2009 at 17:16
One principle MUST be opposition to all forms of amnesty for illegals (such as "path to citizenship" amnesty), AND the enforcement of all existing immigration laws. This would energize the base, attract independents such as myself, and bring back blue collar Reagan Democrats.BY Ohio Independent on 11/23/2009 at 19:07
If they don't mention opposition to The World Trade Organization's Codex Alimentarius, whereby nutrition is illegal and vitamins can only be purchased via prescription, that is bad. If they don't label cap and trade a hoax, that is bad. If they don't condemn UN Agenda 21 where we are supposed to be priced out of the countryside via exorbitant taxes and live in little green population centers, that is bad. If they don't vow to have the health bill dismantled, that is bad. Then, third party or bust.BY Lila Cardiff on 11/23/2009 at 19:35
What is a "Republican Purist"? A Libertarian whom wants no government? An evangelical whom wants a Christian Nation? Or, a Bush-Cheney liar?BY Larry Linn on 11/23/2009 at 20:41

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.