THE HILL
 

Grassley: Senate health debate will focus on GOP alternatives

By Michael O'Brien - 11/25/09 11:20 AM ET

The Senate's post-Thanksgiving health debate will center around GOP ideas, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) suggested Wednesday.

Grassley, a key player in the Senate's health reform deliberations this year, said that the debate, which is expected to begin next week, to focus on the Republican alternatives and amendments offered to the bill.

"I think the topics of debate will probably be centered on Republican alternatives," Grassley said in a conference call with Iowa reporters. "And we probably won't have one comprehensive alternative. We'll probably have a lot of different subsection amendments."

Republican leaders have said they would prefer to see the Senate debate last weeks, though Democrats in the chamber have said they hope to finish the bill by Christmas.

Grassley said the GOP amendments would likely involve medical malpractice reform, opening up pooling opportunities for small businesses, and eliminating cuts in Medicare contained in the bill.

But there will still be a number of Democratic issues to be resolved in the coming month's debate. Not least of those issues is whether the Senate bill can pass with a public (or "government-run") option. Several centrist senators, most notably Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), have said they would oppose the final bill if it includes the public plan as currently proposed.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69431-grassley-senate-debate-will-focus-on-gop-alternatives

Comments (4)

Senator Grassley: Kindly KILL the Individual Mandate. It's unConstitutiona l, Sir. Offer tax credits to those who choose TO purchase a "qualified" Health Insurance policy, rather than taxes/fines/penalties/jail time to those who choose NOT to purchase a policy. The former is a proven way to get people to move in the direction you want them to move in. The latter? A recipe for disaster, Sir. Try to force the American People, under threat of jail time, to purchase something they may not even WANT, and at a substantial cost, and there WILL BE a revolt. Count on it.BY Dusan on 11/25/2009 at 12:15
ANY GOP legislation HAS to be better than what the Dems have planned for us. Gitmo, Cap/Trade, and now Tidal Wave Insurance scheme, will although it will cost all of us honest people a fortune, is supposed to "save" me money. You've got to feel sorry for liberals; I'd hate to be so stupid that I consider the GOP wrong and the Dems right on the current assortment of issues…BY Billy on 11/25/2009 at 12:34
Dusan and Billy…if the GOP had any real ideas to make healthcare a cheaper and accessible to more Americans, they would have done it years ago, when they controlled Washington. If that doesn't make it clear to you that they have zero interest in helping either of you or anyone you know have better healthcare, then you truly have given up on thinking for yourselves. Its okay - you can get real news from sources beyond Fox: We Deceive, You Believe.BY wereyoubornyesterday on 11/25/2009 at 13:52
YOUWEREbornyest erday: I have no faith in either Republicans OR Democrats to "solve" this problem. That's because it's NOT THEIR PLACE to do so. And Who said I needed "help". I don't. I can pay my own way, WITHOUT the Government stepping in and telling me what I "must" purchase, and what coverage I "shall" have. Here's a clue: Try using your health insurance for what it's MEANT FOR: Emergencies and major illnesses/operations. Rather than as a COST CONTAINMENT tool. Buy a Catastrphic Care Policy to cover ONLY these occasions, (hint, hint: They cost about $100-$120 per month for the average American), and pay for everything ELSE out of pocket. An office visit to a GP costs about $85.00. Now - how many times do you anticipate that you'll visit the doctor for "I have the sniffles" reasons, per month? You'd have to go at least once EVERY WEEK in order to spend the same amount in office visits as you would to pay for PREMIUMS, in order to get your office visits for "free" - AFTER your deductible. YOU'RE the one who's given up thinking for YOURSELF, genius. LOL. If you pay ONLY for insurance against "catastrophies", and pay the rest out of pocket, you'll save THOUSANDS of dollars in USELESS premiums per year. And you'll only cust a check, or fork over your hard earned money, when you USE health care services. Gee…THAT sure is complicated! Pffffffttt. Try THINKING, (as you admonish others to do), rather than following the lemmings over the cliff, those who keep telling you "We need MORE insurance, or we're doomed! ARGH!" We don't need MORE insurance. What we need is LESS. Not that difficult to figure out. IF you can "think for yourself", that is. Give it a shot. You might like it.BY Dusan on 11/25/2009 at 16:48

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
Bannered across Drudge this morning is a question most of us in the Beltway have asked about the snow storm Friday: "When will it stop?" Below, Drudge links to an AP article on the recent trouble facing New York Gov. David Paterson (D), who many thought was about to be rocked by political scandal by a forthcoming story in The New York Times. That story hasn't arrived -- but speculation about its contents surely has -- leading Paterson to say he would depart office only as a result of the ballot box, or if he's carried out "in a box."… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"KEEP TRYING" -- That's the message one HuffPo writer took from the latest WaPo/ABC poll, which showed 63 percent of Americans still favored further action on healthcare reform. Additionally, Ryan Grim posts his recent interview with Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who predicted his chamber's historic filibuster could "fall of its own weight -- it should fall of its own weight -- or it will fall after some massive conflict on the floor, which has happened in the past where there have been rulings from the chair that have led to reform."… Read More »
The Corner
The Corner's Mark Krikorian points out in a recent post that the private sector -- namely, the National Review -- was able to devise how many immigrants were residing within the United States faster than the U.S. government could produce that data. And offering further proof that former Gov. Sarah Palin's (R-Alaska) crib notes have become something of a political meme is Kathryn Jean Lopez, who notices a famous country singer penning notes on his hand.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
"The story of coals dirty, deadly legacy" headlines The Washington Independent this morning. The story relates the political significance, health effects and community impacts of a fossil fuel that reporter Mike Lillis believes has White House's clear embrace.Earlier, Lillis looked at one element of Democrats' forthcoming jobs bill: A proposed unemployment insurance extension. The bill offers jobless Americans an additional three months of aid -- less than what the White House's budget requests, but on par with the House's extention, passed late last year.… Read More »
Red State
Michael Steele's remark this week -- that he has been subject to intense criticism because of his race -- has earned the scorn of Red State's Eric Erickson, who lambasts the Republican National Committee chairman in a blog post published late Tuesday. "Actually, it could have nothing to do with race and everything to do with outsourcing the RNC to the same consultants who have been bleeding the RNC dry for years," he says of Steele's low popularity. "It could have something to do with management styles. It could have everything to do with the Chairman never meeting a shoe he didn’t want to eat."… Read More »
MyDD
Jonathan Singer on Wednesday explores the current state of President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. But with the help of Slate's Doug Kendall, he finds that the president has both nominated fewer and confirmed fewer judges to federal benches than his predecessor at this point in his presidency. Concludes Singer: "But with a real crisis in the judiciary in the form of dozens of vacancies, one has to wonder why this President has nominated fewer than half of the judges nominated by his predecessor."… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.