THE HILL
 

Ensign: Resignation would take away resources from defeating Harry Reid

By Tony Romm - 11/30/09 01:28 PM ET

Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) rebuffed calls for his resignation, despite growing concerns that he may have violated congressional ethics rules in connection with his recently unearthed affair.

The senator, who will finish his term in 2012, claimed his absence would "split the resources" available to the party and hamper the GOP's ability to unseat fellow Nevadan, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D), in 2010.

"I was elected to a six-year term by the people of Nevada, and I intend on serving that out," Ensign told a local radio station Monday morning, describing the affair he admitted to this June as "a huge mistake ... a terrible thing."

"A lot of people running for office next year, I've met them, and they want me to be involved in their campaigns," the senator added, championing what he said were his conservative credentials on fiscal policy and healthcare reform.

But a brief conversation about those two issues again brought Ensign and his interviewer back to discussing the 2010 election, at which point Ensign set his sights on Reid, who seems to be lagging recently in preliminary polls.

"One of the things people forget, if I resign, we have a second Senate race. For the people who want to beat Harry Reid, if you have a second Senate race in this state you take the attention off of Harry Reid," Ensign said, noting his departure would eventually trigger a special election to fill his seat. "I think that would hurt the conservative cause." 

It has nonetheless been a rough few months for Ensign, who has fought back numerous allegations that he violated congressional ethics rules in an attempt to downplay his 2008 affair with Cindy Hampton. At issue is whether the senator wrongfully helped her husband, Doug, solicit employment in exchange for his silence.

Doug Hampton, however, eventually took the story to Fox News, which prompted Ensign to pre-empt the news with his own admission of the affair.

The furor over Ensign's tryst has somewhat died down, and the senator said Monday he and his wife had reconciled and moved on. But lingering are the ethics charges that Ensign promptly dismissed during his interview.

"It's perfectly legal," he said of his behavior, adding he would supply investigators with all necessary information. "I complied with all Senate ethics rules and applicable laws.”

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69783-ensign-resignation-would-take-resources-away-from-defeating-reid

Comments (10)

ItBY H P on 11/30/2009 at 15:44
If the Republicans and Sen. Ensign want to hold others to a higher standard, then you need to practice what you preach. However if Sen. Ensign doesn't hold that standard for himself, then he should never talk about moral, ethical, or other convservative values because he can't even hold himself accountable to those same standards. There are to many conservative politicians, commentators, or other figures that say they are pro-family, pro-life, pro-fiscal restraint, and pro-that, but they're are also the first to go against these values, such as having an affair (non-pro-family), for the death penality (non pro-life or Christian values to forgive), adding earmarks (which create higher spending by the government and increases the national debt), etc. Just look at Sen. Ensign, Sen. Vitter, Gov. Mark Sanford, etc. At least others who have admitted to there mistake have left their office, resigned, and are working on their personal and public life to better themselves as they could no longer enforce the integrity of the office they were elected too.BY Rick on 11/30/2009 at 16:37
Okay Ensign, so you are a martyr for the Conservative cause, huh? It is so noble of you to remain in office in order to defeat Harry Reid. Granted, I can't stand Harry Reid, but Harry Reid, though he has been unfaithful to the American people, has not - as far as anyone knows - been unfaithful to his wife and tried to silence others with lucrative jobs. Frankly, I would like to see both of you out of a job come November and I don't think getting you out will affect getting him out.BY Garrett on 11/30/2009 at 17:57
It seems that Sen. Ensign has decided that he is above all of his indiscretions. Does the fact that he worries about whether or not Sen. Reid is reelected sound at all like a political statement? The fact that his folks "helped" pay the Hampton's almost $100,000, just does not seem to enter into the equation. This is ethical? It sure looks like extortion, blackmail, or at least hush money. Of course Sen. Corburn and the "C" street gang told him that "it's not a problem," because their (church) says so!! Where is the integrity or moral standing in this hierarchal group of so called value based Christians. What "Bible" are they using? Might I suggset it's not the same as most of the world does!BY ART on 11/30/2009 at 18:04
Its not that Ensign engaged in an indiscretion…it his utter hypocrisy. The American people will forgive someone who simply made a mistake…Ensign IS a mistake.BY Mike P. on 11/30/2009 at 18:27
Is not what they do with lobbyists an equal indescretion?Yet no one calls for resignations, there are plenty of Washingtonites who may not have affaires of the flesh. However the affaires with lobbyists are damaging to ourselfs as well.BY Artman on 11/30/2009 at 20:41
Ensign should not be asked to leave, he should BE FORCED TO LEAVE. If not byt he Senate, then FORCED BY BEING ARRESTED and thrown in jail. End…BY Winski on 11/30/2009 at 21:09
The funniest (and saddest) aspect of Ensign's spin- in justifying his place and suggesting that 2 races would take the eye off Reid is the FACT that his parents, the same ones that paid of the Hampton's are also maxed out in contributions to Reid! Hilarious…Nevada Republicans are evidently very gullible.BY Kevj on 11/30/2009 at 21:40
Of course, he tries to downplay it, saying he "may" have broken ethics rules. Quite simply, he probably committed felonies, if the facts are confirmed.BY Uosdwis on 11/30/2009 at 21:53
What is more important, doing the right thing and resigning for the people of Nevada, or worrying about the conservative cause? Obviously for republicans worrying about your own is the only important thing. When you violate Congressional ethics rules you should never resign if it hurts your party…The republicans are such hypocrites it is crazy.BY kentucky on 12/01/2009 at 08:57

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.