THE HILL
 

Dems split on stock tax

By Silla Brush - 11/30/09 06:54 PM ET

House Democrats are clashing over a draft bill that would tax financial transactions in an effort to raise $150 billion per year.

Democratic Reps. Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.), Mike McMahon (N.Y.) and Debbie Halvorson (Ill.) are circulating a letter opposed to the stock transaction tax idea. They're squaring off against the tax's main supporters, including Reps. Peter DeFazio (Ore.) and Ed Perlmutter (Colo.).

The 0.25 tax would be levied on stock, futures, derivatives and other transactions. The financial industry strongly opposes the tax and argues it would hurt the economy as it begins to recover.

"The imposition of such a tax would place a huge new tax burden on our fragile economy and could drive up an already high 10.2% unemployment rate. It also may have serious unintended consequences on our financial markets by raising the cost of credit and private investment for businesses and governments alike," McMahon, Maloney and Halvorson wrote in a draft letter. "A tax on stock transactions would affect every single person who owns and invests in stocks from small business owners to senior citizens."

DeFazio and Perlmutter have floated the tax to raise $150 billion per year, half of which would go toward paying down the deficit and the other half would support a job creation fund, according to a draft copy of the bill obtained by The Hill.

Democrats on and off the hill are searching for new ways to create jobs as the unemployment rate continues to rise. DeFazio and Perlmutter called the bill the "Let Wall Street Pay for The Restoration of Main Street Act of 2009."


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69831-dems-split-on-stock-tax

Comments (59)

"Public officials oppose stock market reform in favor of those stock market firms that bribe them…"No surprise here.New word for Washington politicians: drug addicts.To me, it says it all, in every way.BY tropicgirl on 11/30/2009 at 19:22
I commed those three Democratic reps for taking the initiative and opposing something that is wrong. They truly get what will happen if a tax like this was to be enacted. It would not affect Wall Street but everyone who invests, like they said, individual , small business owner, senior citizen. Everyone who partakes in any type of investment for their future whether it be for retirement, education, kids, or health will be affected by this tax and have diminished returns. They will be taxed regardless if the profit or not, and taxed on the purchase and sale of a security. Then have capital gains tax to pay on top of that. So a triple taxation. Which will hamper economic recovery, hamper innovation becuase some childs educational/college fund would not have grown enough to go to the best school or perhaps no school at all. There could be untouched potential that was there but not able to be tapped becuase they were triple taxed. Companies that depend on transactions for their business will be charged more forcing them to compensate by laying people off or less transactions , less capital in our system. Its a sure fire way to increase our unemployment rate if this tax is enacted. We are the financial hub of the world , in good and bad times, we do not want to hand that business over to another country. We can better regulate with better reforms, but a tax should not be one of them. Its about time those in the house are coming around. Why tax an industry that so many depend on for funding for business and research and development that employs so many, and I am not talking about the traders. You have support people, people that clean these firms, people that feed these firms, accountants that service these firms, I can go on and on. If you tax the industry you take food out of the mouths of possibly 100s of thousands of people emplyed by these firms that had nothing to do with the crisis, only a select few caused this crisis. Not traders, but the ones that originated these bad sub prime loans and sold them, punish them. Thank youBY rsikit on 11/30/2009 at 19:29
This tax has NOTHING to do with the big Wall Street firms. It is a way to milk the ordinary investor. You pay a tax to get in and a tax to get out whether or not your investment is profitable ? Finally some dems that get it.BY JayG on 11/30/2009 at 19:34
It's about time someone came out against this tax. Certainly the tax would cause a severe drop in trading volume in our markets, resulting in much higher costs to buy or sell a stock. By some estimates this cost could be 10X as high as the tax itself. Kudos to Maloney, McMahon, and Halvorson for being clear-sighted enough to foresee these types of major unintended consequences.BY Jim Piper on 11/30/2009 at 19:38
This tax would devastate investment in the US, cost of capital would skyrocket under the investment tax proposed by defazio and perlmutter. This is truly one of the most harmful bills proposed for the well-being of the US and its capital markets. I commend Representatives Maloney, McMahon, and Halvorson. Taxes on investment yield less investment.BY Billy Thunder on 11/30/2009 at 19:48
While it's true that the democrats mentioned in this article are from trade-heavy states, Nancy Pelosi has also stated that a domestic transaction tax is not feasible, and the Obama administration is against the tax on both a domestic and international level. The democrats drafting the jobs bill simply need to set this tax idea aside and refocus their efforts on more realistic goals. They would have a better chance trying to siphon the leftover TARP funds.BY Haverchuck on 11/30/2009 at 19:59
I find it absolutely absurd that any type of transaction tax would be considered in this country. Implementing something like this would be suicidal for our economy, and would lead to thousands more jobs lost at financial firms and brokerage houses. I also find it comical that leftist Democrats say a tax on transactions would relieve us of any risk from future bailouts. What complete and utter crap they spew. If morons like Pete Defazio get their way, a tax like this would simply become a new source for political spending, and not go towards creating new jobs. They would only use this tax as an excuse to funnel more funding to their corrupt, criminal political organizations like ACORN, who have been caught on undercover video advocating prostitution, and tax cheating.A tax like this would completely cripple mom pop daytraders, who had absolutely nothing to do with the financial crisis that developed. I applaud the House Democrats that are coming out against this proposed tax, as it would not only cause great harm to our overall economy, but cause our nations unemployment rate to skyrocket even higher due to the jobs that would be lost in our financial sector.BY jksn922 on 11/30/2009 at 20:40
Let's see on this web page alone - stock tax, war tax, gas tax, taxes in the healthcare reform bill. Just the right thing to do in a recession, Democrats, if you're trying to ruin us all. That is your plan, right?BY jcp370 on 11/30/2009 at 20:47
There's no better way to make Beijing the Financial Capital of the World than to tax traders from the USA out of their livelihood. You don't think they'll trade in a foreign country? Day BY Jack Pearson on 11/30/2009 at 20:59
Correction: traders are NOT from the USA. They, themselves may live here, and their kids may suck off our tax dollars, but the companies they trade on are offshored, outsourced, NAFTA, VAFTA WTO bast**ds. They have destroyed American jobs. They have LONG SINCE been identified as American.It may be suicidal for these Wall Street hacks, but its music to the ears for the rest of us "Americans".Now, on the other hand, if the Democrats use the money as corruptly as they are capable, so be it, it is wrong.But PLEEEASE don't imply that there is any sort of trickle-down. These companies LONG AGO HAVE ABANDONED THE IDEA OF EMPLOYING AMERICAN WORKERS. Thanks to the cigar president, that hack, Clinton.Some of you really need better talking points. The rich are in a totally different world than the American family.What needs to happen is that international (fake American) corporations need to pay and pay and pay for the destruction they have done, not only to the American worker, but to the poor victims, offshore, who slave to make their goods, under horrendous circumstances.Wow, these American corporations, and the american rich really make me proud. Now let me barf.BY tropicgirl on 11/30/2009 at 21:12

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
Drudge Report
"Punch will stun West," reads the headline above the fold on Drudge this Tuesday. The line refers to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent, vague promise this week to somehow "punch the arrogance" of the West on February 11. Also above the fold: A slew of weather-related links, including a report from the National Weather Service that predicts more snow for the already buried Capitol.… Read More »
The Huffington Post
"Healthcare theatrics" reads the banner atop The Huffington Post, which links to an AP story on the White House's struggle to bring GOP leaders to the table for a televised healthcare summit. The AP questions whether the event may have any utility outside of immediate personal politics. Below, reporter Sam Stein reports Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) plans to vote against the White House's nominee for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Craig Becker.… Read More »
Red State
Moe Lane this morning summarizes the latest back-and-forth between the White House and congressional GOP leaders over healthcare. The White House wants Republicans to join Democrats for a televised healthcare summit in the coming days, but GOP leaders do not want Democrats' bill to be the basis for those talks. Meanwhile, Brian Darling takes on NYT columnist Paul Krugman's latest piece, in which he rails on the filibuster (and the GOP's use of it). "He is clearly way outside of his area of expertise when talking about Senate procedure, because his analysis is laughable," Darling writes.… Read More »
The Washington Independent
Spencer Ackerman leads The Washington Independent this morning with a post about William Lietzau, a top Obama White House appointee first installed during President George W. Bush's tenure. Lietzau handled the military commissions the Supreme Court later found unconstitutional, and Ackerman reports that he will soon become Deputy Assistant Secretary for Detainee Affairs.Earlier, David Weigel shared Defense Secretary Robert Gates' thoughts on the passing of Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha (D). Noted Gates: "In our dealings over the years, Jack and I did not always agree, but I always respected his candor, and knew that he cared deeply about the men and women of America’s military and intelligence community." … Read More »
AMERICAblog
John Aravosis points out that Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) has dropped most of his unprecedented blanket hold on most of the White House's nominees -- except a few defense posts, which remain tied up as Shelby seeks two lucrative military contracts for his home state. Later, Aravosis reports that the Department of Health and Human Services has opened an investigation into the California Blue Cross health insurance program, following reports that premiums there have increased 39 percent recently.… Read More »
The Corner
News that Iran may have started enriching uranium has prompted The Corner's Mike Potemra to issue the Middle Eastern state a warnining: "It’s not too late for Iran to turn back from such a disastrous course: Even evil regimes — regimes that systematically violate the rights of their own people — have the use of intellect." Also, gues blogger Ralph Reed offers his thoughts on former Gov. Sarah Palin's national political aspirations. Ultimately, he calls her a "bridge" between Tea Party activists and the GOP establishment.… Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gkenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries »   Technology »
 Day's End Round-Up »   Telecom and IT »
 Energy & Environment »   Trade and Agriculture »
 Midday Blog Roundup »  Lobbying »
 Morning Read »   Administration »
 News »   Campaigns »
  Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Civil Rights »   Defense »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Foreign Policy »   Homeland Security »
   Healthcare »   Immigration »
   Homeland Security »   Labor »
   Immigration »   Lobbyists »
   Labor »   Technology »
   Law and Courts »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Presidential Campaigns »  Other »
   Technology »   Administration »
   Telecom and IT »   Campaigns »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Civil Rights »
  Energy & Environment »   Congressional Campaigns »
  Lawmaker News »   Corporate Governance »
   Administration »   Defense »
   Campaigns »   Economy & Budget »
   Civil Rights »   Energy & Environment »
   Corporate Governance »   Foreign Policy »
   Defense »   Healthcare »
   Economy & Budget »   Homeland Security »
   Energy & Environment »   Immigration »
   Foreign Policy »   Labor »
   Healthcare »   Lobbyists »
   Homeland Security »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
   Technology »  Oversight »
   Telecom and IT »   Administration »
   Trade and Agriculture »   Campaigns »
  Legislation »   Civil Rights »
   Administration »   Corporate Governance »
   Campaigns »   Defense »
   Civil Rights »   Economy & Budget »
   Corporate Governance »   Energy & Environment »
   Defense »   Foreign Policy »
   Economy & Budget »   Healthcare »
   Energy & Environment »   Homeland Security »
   Foreign Policy »   Immigration »
   Healthcare »   Labor »
   Homeland Security »   Lobbyists »
   Immigration »   Technology »
   Labor »   Telecom and IT »
   Lobbyists »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.