THE HILL
 
comment
Print

Party crashers decline to testify

By Eric Zimmermann - 12/02/09 10:41 PM ET

The now infamous White House party crashers are declining a request to tesitfy before the House Homeland Security Committee tomorrow.

In a statement issued through their publicist, Michaele and Tareq Salahi said they have cooperated fully with the Secret Service and have submitted sworn statements to the committee.

"The Salahis believe that, having provided all relevant information to Representatives King and Thompson, there is nothing further that they can do to assist Congress in its inquiry regarding White House protocol and certain security procedures," the statement read. "They therefore respectfully decline to testify.

The committee can still subpoena the couple.

The statement also claims that Secret Service agents let them pass each of three checkpoints without any trouble or second guessing, despite the fact that the couple was apparently not invited to the state dinner.

"Four days prior to the evening of November 24, 2009, at the specific request of a White House official, the Salahis provided their identifying information, as is required of White House guests," the statement reads.

"On the evening of November 24, 2009, Michaele and Tareq Salahi presented their United States passports to three different Secret Service Agents at various White House checkpoints as did all other attendees.  Each of the agents examined the Salahis’ passports and compared it to documentation at each checkpoint.  No further inquiries by the Secret Service agents were made at any of the checkpoints."

The documentation have been submitted beforehand because the Salahis were seeking an official invitation through Pentagon official Michele Jones. Emails between Jones and the couple have shown that the Salahis left for the White House without confirmation of an invitation but believed one might be present when they arrived.

While the statement acknowledges that mistakes were "made by all parties involve," the Salahis seemed to place the blame squarely at the feet of the White House and Secret Service.

The couple claim that "no laws were broken," and that "White House protocol relating to invitations was either deficient or mismanaged."

Read their full statement after the jump:



THE SALAHIS FULLY COOPERATE WITH THE US SECRET SERVICE AND CONGRESS

Michaele and Tareq Salahi Did Not Violate Any Laws


[Washington, DC | Wednesday December 2, 2009] ----- Four days prior to the evening of November 24, 2009, at the specific request of a White House official, the Salahis provided their identifying information, as is required of White House guests.  On the evening of November 24, 2009, Michaele and Tareq Salahi presented their United States passports to three different Secret Service Agents at various White House checkpoints as did all other attendees.  Each of the agents examined the Salahis’ passports and compared it to documentation at each checkpoint.  No further inquiries by the Secret Service agents were made at any of the checkpoints.

The Salahis have fully cooperated with the United States Secret Service since learning of its investigation into the security procedures employed at the November 24, 2009 White House State Dinner.  On numerous occasions, the Salahis have voluntarily met with investigating agents and provided them with documentation, including all relevant emails and cell phone records that detail communications with a White House official.  The Salahis have also voluntarily submitted sworn statements concerning the events of November 24, 2009.  In sum, the Salahis have fulfilled all requests made by the United States Secret Service.
 
Through their attorneys, and to assist in tomorrow's House Committee on Homeland Security's hearing on this matter, the Salahis have voluntarily presented similar information to Congressman Peter King, the Ranking Minority Member on the Committee, as well as to the staff of Congressman Benny Thompson, Chairman of the Committee.  This information included the Salahis' sworn statements and their relevant email correspondence with a White House official.
 
The evidence presented to the United States Secret Service and to certain members of Congress clearly shows: (1) that no laws were broken, (2) that White House protocol relating to invitations was either deficient or mismanaged, and (3) that there were honest misunderstandings and mistakes made by all parties involved.
 
The Salahis believe that, having provided all relevant information to Representatives King and Thompson, there is nothing further that they can do to assist Congress in its inquiry regarding White House protocol and certain security procedures. They therefore respectfully decline to testify.



Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/70357-salahis-say-no-trouble-at-checkpoints

More Videos »

Blog Briefing Room Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gateway Pundit
Glenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Lucianne
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries » Day's End Round-Up »
 Energy & Environment » Midday Blog Roundup »
 Morning Read » News »
  Campaigns »   Administration »
   Civil Rights »   Congressional Campaigns »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Law and Courts »   Lobbyists »
   Presidential Campaigns »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Energy & Environment »  Lawmaker News »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Legislation »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Energy & Environment »
   Foreign Policy »   Healthcare »
   Homeland Security »   Immigration »
   Labor »   Lobbyists »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Lobbying »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Other »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Oversight »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.