THE HILL
 

Nelson to oppose Becker for NLRB spot

By Tony Romm - 02/08/10 08:17 PM ET

Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson (D) on Monday announced he would oppose Craig Becker's nomination to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) -- a move that could ultimately scuttle Becker's confirmation indefinitely.

Senate Democratic leaders needed the help of their entire 59-vote caucus, plus one Republican defector, to invoke cloture this Tuesday on Becker's nomination, which has awaited a full Senate vote since the summer of 2009. But Nelson's decision to oppose the White House's top candidate for the job seriously threatens those plans, as it now appears Democrats will not have the votes they need to proceed as intended this week.

Nelson outlined his objections to Becker's nomination in a statement issued late Monday, stressing he felt the former AFL-CIO lawyer would "take an aggressive personal agenda to the NLRB, and that he would pursue a personal agenda there, rather than that of the Administration.”

“This is of great concern, considering that the Board’s main responsibility is to resolve labor disputes with an even and impartial hand," Nelson added. "In addition, the nominee’s statements fly in the face of Nebraska’s Right to Work laws, which have been credited in part with our excellent business climate that has attracted employers and many good jobs to Nebraska. Considering these matters, I will oppose the upcoming cloture motion and the nomination.”

Becker's nomination has drawn its fair share of political foes -- especially from the right, as many Republicans fear he is too pro-labor to work for an agency that handles employer, employee and labor disputes.

He is an adamant supporter of card-check legislation -- a proposal that allows unions to form more easily, supported by the White House -- and has done considerable work for the AFL-CIO and the Service Employees International Union. Consequently, a handful of business groups have signaled staunch opposition to his nomination, and a few Republican senators -- including Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) -- have threatened filibusters.

Senate Democrats still believed they had the numbers to confirm Becker, despite GOP dissatisfaction. But the election of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts eroded the party's 60-vote supermajority -- and with it, Democrats' chances of confirming Becker mostly unopposed.

Still, Nelson's decision to oppose the White House's NLRB nominee further imperils Becker's chances. It is unclear how Senate Democratic leaders plan to proceed.

Nevertheless, the move could also carry significant implications for the NLRB itself, currently embroiled in a Supreme Court crisis that could render it temporarily unable to adjudicate labor disputes.

Only two members sit on the all-important panel -- Chairwoman Wilma Liebman, a Democratic appointee, and Peter Schaumber, a Republican appointee. The lack of a quorum has ultimately prompted the nation's high bench to question whether it should continue operating without additional members.

It also prompted Liebman to issue lawmakers a rare appeal last week to confirm Becker and two other nominees, who have been held up since last summer.

"We have done our best to carry out the Board’s important work, issuing more than 500 decisions in cases involving thousands of workers across the country," Liebman said in a statement. "But our authority to do so has been challenged and now the Supreme Court will decide whether we can continue to function."

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/80277-nelson-to-oppose-becker-for-nlrb-spot

Comments (13)

LOL Ben! LOL Union thugs! How's that taste? Ben Nelson, you keep this up, and you may, MAY, work your way back into my good graces…Hope Becker didnt pack up his old office…BY Shawn on 02/08/2010 at 20:27
The author is clearly very un-informed as he claims that "it is unclear how Senate Democratric leaders plan to proceed" , well that just goes to show you how the RETHUGLICAN MEDIA TOADYS try to use reasonable sounding LIES to make their delusional points, Senate Majority Leader REID hasd made it clear exactly how he plans to proceed to end the blocking of the PRESIDENTS picks…RECESS APPOINTMENTS and I for one say DO IT. and end the filibuster as it only takes 51 to change the rules.BY Thomas G Williams on 02/09/2010 at 00:37
If Obama uses a recess appointment for the HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE Becker, his action will be the impetus for the voters to unleash a FIRE STORM upon the Democratic Party, in which they will suffer excruciating losses in this fall's midterm election. The American people will see what A RECESS APPOINTMENT OF CRAIG BECKER really IS - an end run around the Congress (more politics as usual) and A POLITICAL PAY OFF TO ANDY STERN, SEIU, TRUMKA AND THE AFL-CIO. Obama really needs to tell Becker 'thanks but no thanks', and pick a much less controversial nominee.BY HuskedByBen on 02/09/2010 at 01:57
Controversial? Really? In what universe? Give me a break…BY Shawn on 02/09/2010 at 06:08
Becker is the worst possible choice for the NLRB. However, Harry Reid has nothing to lose and may as well support a recess appointment, as his career is almost over.BY Arroyo on 02/09/2010 at 08:58
Funny how a recess appointment is seen as an end run around the will of Congress rather than what is really true — a filibuster is an attempt to block Congress from expressing its view. Let's have a vote to see what the will of Congress actually is. I guess that would be undemocratic. It is also amusing to read people's comments about Craig Becker as if they know him very well or have been closely studying his work over the years. So what he wrote an article 16 years spinning a pro-union theory that is beyond what the current law allows? Many administrative and Article III judges, both Republican and Democratic, have done that during their career, especially if they were an academic, prior to being appointed and have done fine on the bench because they have a p[***]ion and respect for the law. Becker would be no different. Interesting how the management-side lawyers who know and have worked with Becker think he would do a great job on the Board but that doesn't seem to matter. Apparently what matters is that a bunch of self-interested ideologues who get their information from a blog think he is a bad choice. A year ago John McCain did not know Craig Becker from David Beckham but now he's running for election and the Chamber is pulling his strings so he has to demonize him. Pathetic.BY Ralph DeRosa on 02/09/2010 at 09:44
The second Shawn is NOT ME. Becker is a disgusting human, and a former lawyer for both the SEIU and AFL-CIO. He is as biased an individual as you could ever choose for that job. It's like picking a fat kid to serve on the candy advocacy council. And yobongo has refused to fill the remaining Republican available seat. I DARE Oboonga to use a recession appointment to appoint Becker. If things werent bad enough in November for the Libtards, this would actually, if its possible, make things worse.BY Shawn on 02/09/2010 at 09:52
Becker a "disgusting human?" "Libtards." "Oboonga" "Yobongo." Does this site have any standards or will it publish anything? No sense getting up in arms. A wise person once said, "Yelling at an idiot will only harm the one who yells and will have no effect on the idiot." The President should recess appoint the two Democratic nominees and hold off on the Republican until a full vote by the Senate is allowed.BY Ralph DeRosa on 02/09/2010 at 10:41
Do not approve of Craig Becker for NCRB. We have enough of the mao-loving, saul alinsky believers in the white house, cabinet and congress today. America does not need another one of these…tear down America with unions for everyone anywhere near the president! DO NOT APPROVE OF BECKER WHO THINKS UNIONS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN A DEMOCRACY!BY mindy on 02/09/2010 at 13:23
No chance that happens. None.BY Shawn on 02/09/2010 at 13:30

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Blog Briefing Room Twitter - Click to follow

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
contentions
It seems as though Shirley Sherrod’s ‘wisdom and dignity’ could make her for a good advising role in the White House, John Steele Gordon says at contentions. Also, there wasn’t a more fitting tribute to Stanley McChrystal than the former Army general’s retirement ceremony on Friday, Max Boot writes. … Read More »
firedoglake
If outgoing BP CEO Tony Hayward’s severance package is as reported, it’s the definition of ‘moral hazard,’ Jim White argues at firedoglake. Also, former Rep. Tom Tancredo’s (R-Colo.) call for President Obama’s impeachment makes sense within the larger context of emerging GOP rhetoric, Blue Texan says. … Read More »
Daily Kos
Money and healthcare go hand in hand, exmearden writes at Daily Kos in a first-hand perspective. Also, a fired Texas bus driver who refused to take a woman to Planned Parenthood shouldn’t get his job back, Kaili Joy Gray says. … Read More »
Hot Air
ABC’s Jake Tapper has had a good run as the interim host as “This Week,” at least from a conservative perspective, Ed Morrissey writes at Hot Air. Also, Howard Dean might have overreached to suggest that Fox News had been “absolutely racist” in its handling of the Shirley Sherrod story, Allahpundit argues. … Read More »
FiveThirtyEight
This year’s midterm elections are a little more complicated than “it’s the economy stupid,” Nate Silver writes. Ed Kilgore runs down the results of the Alabama runoff results. … Read More »
Ezra Klein
Ezra Klein’s “Wonkbook” details several news stories about fiscal policy, including several clips about President Obama’s pick to head the Office of Management and Budget, Jacob Lew. Dylan Matthews probes how much the EPA can counter climate change. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gateway Pundit
Glenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Lucianne
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries » Day's End Round-Up »
 Energy & Environment » Midday Blog Roundup »
 Morning Read » News »
  Campaigns »   Administration »
   Civil Rights »   Congressional Campaigns »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Law and Courts »   Lobbyists »
   Presidential Campaigns »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Energy & Environment »  Lawmaker News »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Legislation »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Energy & Environment »
   Foreign Policy »   Healthcare »
   Homeland Security »   Immigration »
   Labor »   Lobbyists »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Lobbying »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Other »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Oversight »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.