THE HILL
 

House approves $15B job bill, 217-201

By Michael O'Brien and Bob Cusack - 03/04/10 04:34 PM ET

The House passed the Senate's $15 billion jobs bill in a 217-201 vote on Thursday.

Lawmakers voted to approve the package, which provides a series of tax credits for job creation and other stimulus measures, after Democrats struggled to pass a rule for the legislation.

Thirty-five Democrats opposed the bill while six Republicans supported it.

The jobs bill had passed through the Senate after Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) pulled a larger, more comprehensive bill that had been negotiated by Democrats and Republicans, only to offer the more modest, $15 billion package.

The Reid bill, meant to spur job creation, cleared a procedural hurdle with five Republican votes — including new Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) — and one Democratic defection. Thirteen Republican senators supported the package on final passage.

Reid has signaled that he'll proceed with a series of smaller, targeted jobs bills in the days and weeks to come.

The House barely passed the rule that brought the jobs measure to the floor, 212-209, as 38 Democrats defected.

Many Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) members voted against the rules measure, which is usually a straight party-line vote. The defections were a clear rebuke of Democratic leaders.

CBC lawmakers have strongly protested the bill, which is what the Senate passed last month.

CBC Chairwoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) voted against the rule. Other CBC members who voted no include Reps. Donald Payne (D-N.J.), Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), Corrine Brown (D-Fla.) and Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.).

CBC members who voted yes include Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) and Reps. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.) and Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.).

"He said, 'John, if this bill goes down, you can kiss forever goodbye the bill that we really need," Conyers said of Hoyer. 

Conyers said he wants the Senate to take up the House-passed $154 billion jobs that focused on infrastructure projects. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) persuaded the Judiciary Committee chairman to vote for the rule by telling him the Senate would probably not pursue other jobs bill if Thursday's measure failed.Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who rarely votes, registered her "aye" vote on the rule.

During floor debate, Rep. Steven LaTourette (R-Ohio) strongly criticized the jobs bill and lambasted House Democrats for not allowing the GOP to amend it.

After Democrats objected to a motion that would change the bill, LaTourette said, "This is nonsense!"Because of the minor changes the House made to the measure, the bill goes back to the Senate. brown, who attracted criticism from conservatives for voting for the Senate jobs bill, said he would likely back the merged legislation.

"If it's the same, I'll vote for it again with minor tweaks," Brown said. "If minor tweaks mean several billion dollars, then no."

Walter Alarkon contributed to this article, which was updated at 5:57 p.m.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/85049-house-approves-15b-jobs-bill-217-201

Comments (44)

Not having unanimous consent on the jobs bill didn't seem to matter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, however Harry Reid panicked when Jim Bunning objected to his unanimous consent motion to p[***] the same jobs bill in the Senate. Reid should have p[***]ed his jobs bill last Friday without unanimous consent. The liberal media then [***]umed that Reid must be correct in not voting on the bill last Friday, and so they blamed Jim Bunning.BY No Unanimous consent on 03/04/2010 at 15:54
Republicans objecting to a modest Jobs bill. What a shock. I guess they wanted more tax breaks for the wealthy. What a squad!BY NJIND on 03/04/2010 at 15:54
Lets get the names of all the people who voted against this!BY Lloyd C on 03/04/2010 at 15:58
Via email to: Rep. Hall, Appointed Sen. for NY, Sen. Schumer, Pres. Obama Washington DC January 20, 2008 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Yertle: (Now Mr. Corker) I am concerned that the manner in which the federal government is operating is eerily like how the Krupps munitions factory was still billing the Nazi’s - after Hitler committed suicide. Benjamin Franklin once remarked that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing, and expecting different results. The congress has p[***]ed bailouts, and rescues, and soon a, stimulus package, all in an empty effort to save the Republic from the financial malfeasance of governments small and large. If they failed to work in the past what reason do you believe that they will work in the future? It appears to me that the solution is obvious. Forgetting financial reality for a moment. In a given year the US economy generates 10 to 15 trillion dollars. I say why wait for the year to p[***]. Next time all of you are at your respective posts p[***] a bill to print $12.5 Trillion and disperse it. At least that way we will all know who is getting the money. Obviously, however enticing, this idea is absurd. Is it any more so than one insolvent institution, the US Government ($2 Trillion running deficit, $12 Trillion in debt), giving another insolvent institution, US Banks(Bloomberg news service reports $4-$5 Trillion required to re-capitalize them, at the current rate of loss), money it does not have anything to back it other than more debt, and a beaten up taxpayer? With ink so fresh on the bonds that the Communist Chinese government has yet to collect the interest on it? I fail to see the wisdom in how creating a smaller hole in one spot, and a bigger hole in another will ever do any of us any good. This philosophy has not worked in the past and it will not work in the future. The evil economic stew we are cooking has been brewed before, and it will taste just as bitter this time. When Ronald Reagan took the reigns of this nation in 1981 we were in far worse shape than we are in today, a large portion of our military qualified for poverty [***]istance, a business owner could not breathe without the governments permission, inflation was sky high, unemployment at double digits. Unless we do the right thing now we will be there again, rapidly. Our economic problems today are manufactured by our own fiscal malfeasance - there is no shortage of food, energy, labor, or capital. What we have too much of is the heavy hand of government deciding who gets what, how much, and when via a complex set of regulations and tax policy. President Reagan, to the largest extent possible, ended that madness, and while the 80’s were no picnic, that decade created 20,000,000 new jobs, strengthened this nation so we could carry on in the future, and we brought most of the world with us as a lucky strike extra. The economic lesson of the 80’s is that freedom and economic liberty are viral, and the only antidote for it is big government - this is something we have forgotten or chosen to ignore. Up to now President Obamas rhetoric has been the antithesis of this pro growth philosophy. Mr. Obama thinks that a combination of targeted tax cuts, welfare, and government make work projects are the cure for our ills. To do this Mr. Obama will need more bureaucrats, and add more legal and fiscal complexity to meet his goals. I reject this economic cure and its implementation. Remember, what the government gives to one it must take from another. How does the government know that the capital or wealth it is redistributing will not be used for a much wiser purpose then the one it has ordained? It doesn’t. Like an alcoholic in a bar, the government drinks without accountability, and spends the monthly mortgage payment on whiskey without forethought, and hurts everyone it claims to care about. Remember these thoughts as you create the next seemingly free government give away; someone has to pay for it, that someone will be our children, their payment will either be in gold or blood. This insanity of printing, borrowing, and misallocation of capital must stop. No country on earth has ever borrowed, spent or taxed it’s way to recovery, let alone prosperity. War and Depression? Absolutely. If this economic cancer is allowed to metastasize we will once again be pushed as a nation into a choice of not whether we should or should not do something, but whether or not we can. The “stimulus package” legislation all of you are considering is nothing more than economic suicide. Respectfully,BY Joe Doakes on 03/04/2010 at 16:11
There is most certainly a new attack add calling Republicans hypocrites on the way.. BY Lloyd C on 03/04/2010 at 16:14
The authors of this article should be more diligent in explaining (1) what rule was involved here and (2) why CBC members objected to the bill.It would greatly help make sense of what was at issue with the rule and the basis for the CBC members' objection. As the article now stands, there are big holes in this news reporting.BY john de Clef Pi on 03/04/2010 at 16:16
It's not a real jobs bill unless it includes estate tax cuts. How else is Paris Hilton going to create jobs?BY GetReal on 03/04/2010 at 16:16
No Consent; clearly you don't understand the rules. The House doesn't need unanimous consent to bring a vote on something. There is no 3/5 rule there; it is only a majority to bring up and p[***] a bill. Not like the 60 the Republicans insist on with every piece of legislation or Judge in the Senate.BY outraged1 on 03/04/2010 at 16:19
Further skimpiness and glossing over of important details are evident in this article regarding Rep. LaTourette's criticism and what the thrust of his motion was.I say this even as a life-long registered Democrat. The reporting in this article is really deficient on too many points.BY John de Clef Pi on 03/04/2010 at 16:21
What a shocker, more money being thrown around by the democrats. Lets go universal health care and throw a trillion away now!BY anonymous  on 03/04/2010 at 16:21

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

Blog Briefing Room Twitter - Click to follow

Key Blogs

What they are saying today …
contentions
It seems as though Shirley Sherrod’s ‘wisdom and dignity’ could make her for a good advising role in the White House, John Steele Gordon says at contentions. Also, there wasn’t a more fitting tribute to Stanley McChrystal than the former Army general’s retirement ceremony on Friday, Max Boot writes. … Read More »
firedoglake
If outgoing BP CEO Tony Hayward’s severance package is as reported, it’s the definition of ‘moral hazard,’ Jim White argues at firedoglake. Also, former Rep. Tom Tancredo’s (R-Colo.) call for President Obama’s impeachment makes sense within the larger context of emerging GOP rhetoric, Blue Texan says. … Read More »
Daily Kos
Money and healthcare go hand in hand, exmearden writes at Daily Kos in a first-hand perspective. Also, a fired Texas bus driver who refused to take a woman to Planned Parenthood shouldn’t get his job back, Kaili Joy Gray says. … Read More »
Hot Air
ABC’s Jake Tapper has had a good run as the interim host as “This Week,” at least from a conservative perspective, Ed Morrissey writes at Hot Air. Also, Howard Dean might have overreached to suggest that Fox News had been “absolutely racist” in its handling of the Shirley Sherrod story, Allahpundit argues. … Read More »
FiveThirtyEight
This year’s midterm elections are a little more complicated than “it’s the economy stupid,” Nate Silver writes. Ed Kilgore runs down the results of the Alabama runoff results. … Read More »
Ezra Klein
Ezra Klein’s “Wonkbook” details several news stories about fiscal policy, including several clips about President Obama’s pick to head the Office of Management and Budget, Jacob Lew. Dylan Matthews probes how much the EPA can counter climate change. … Read More »
Blog Summaries Archive »
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

Briefing Room Blog Roll

The Hill
ABC News: The Note
AMERICAblog
Barack Obama
Beat The Press
Bill Press
BuzzFlash
Capitol Briefing
Capitol Games
The Caucus (NYT)
Clive Crook
Comments From Left Field
CNN Political Ticker
The Corner (NRO)
Crooks and Liars
The Daily Beast
Daily Caller
Daily Kos
DCCC: The Stakeholder
DNC: Kicking Ass
DSCC: From The Roots
Drudge Report
Eschaton
Extreme Mortman
Ezra Klein
firedoglake
FishbowlDC
The Fix (WashPost)
The Foundry
Gateway Pundit
Glenn Greenwald
Hendrik Hertzberg
Hillary Clinton
Hot Air
Hotline on Call
Huffington Post
Human Events
Instapundit
James Fallows
John McCain
Judicial Watch: Corruption Chronicles
Kaus Files
Left Coaster
Lefty Blogs
Lucianne
Majority AP
Marc Ambinder
Matt Lewis
Matthew Yglesias
Megan McArdle
Michelle Malkin
Minority Report
The Moderate Voice
MSNBC First Read
MyDD
The Nation
National Review
The New Republic
NewsBusters
Newsmax
The NRCC Blog
NRSC Blog
Open Left
Page (Mark Halperin)
The Plank (TNR)
Political Animal
Political Wire
Politicker
Politico's Ben Smith
Politico's Jonathan Martin
Politico's The Crypt
Power Line
Reason
RedState
Right Wing News
RNC Blog
Ross Douthat
Rush Limbaugh
SCOTUSblog
Senate Guru
The Stump (TNR)
The Swamp (Tribune)
Swampland
Swing State Project
Talk Left
TalkingPointsMemo
TAPPED
Tech Policy Summit
techPresident
TechRepublican
The Right Angle
Think Progress
Top of the Ticket (LA Times)
Townhall
TPMCafe
TPMMuckraker
The Trail (WashPost)
Truthdig
USA Today On Politics
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Blog
VF Daily
Washington Wire (WSJ)
Weekly Standard
Wonkette
Yeas and Nays

Briefing Room Blog Topics

 Blog Summaries » Day's End Round-Up »
 Energy & Environment » Midday Blog Roundup »
 Morning Read » News »
  Campaigns »   Administration »
   Civil Rights »   Congressional Campaigns »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Law and Courts »   Lobbyists »
   Presidential Campaigns »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Energy & Environment »  Lawmaker News »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Legislation »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Corporate Governance »   Defense »
   Economy & Budget »   Energy & Environment »
   Foreign Policy »   Healthcare »
   Homeland Security »   Immigration »
   Labor »   Lobbyists »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Lobbying »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
  Other »   Administration »
   Campaigns »   Civil Rights »
   Congressional Campaigns »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Presidential Campaigns »
   Technology »   Telecom and IT »
   Trade and Agriculture »  Oversight »
   Administration »   Campaigns »
   Civil Rights »   Corporate Governance »
   Defense »   Economy & Budget »
   Energy & Environment »   Foreign Policy »
   Healthcare »   Homeland Security »
   Immigration »   Labor »
   Lobbyists »   Technology »
   Telecom and IT »   Trade and Agriculture »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.