Updated, 7:24 p.m.: As of the end of the day, McCaskill says 53 senators have signed the letter.
Sen. Claire McCaskillClaire McCaskillBill would target retaliation against military sexual assault victims Senate Dem takes on drugmaker: ‘It’s time to slaughter some hogs’ Week ahead: Drug pricing back in focus MORE (D-Mo.) said Wednesday she has half the Senate on board with her effort to end senators' anonymous holds on nominations.
McCaskill said she now had 50 senators who had signed the letter she has been circulating pledging to end the use of the practice, in which one senator can object, without giving his or her name, to any nominee moving forward.
McCaskill tweeted Wednesday:
Now have 50 signatures on End the Secret Hold letter.More work on it today.Rules being broken by failure of Rs to reveal who's holding noms.
McCaskill said, too, in a conference call with Missouri reporters Wednesday that she's hopeful she can win a 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority on reform.
"We've crossed the majority -- we haven't gotten to 60, yet I'm feeling confident that we will get to 60," she said.
The Missouri centrist has been leading the charge against the practice, arguing it has been used to some effect by Republicans in the minority to stall or stop President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaMovie trailer gives peek at Obamas' first date Boehner: Ted Cruz a 'miserable son of a bitch' Poll: Most Americans disapprove of ObamaCare MORE's nominees.
Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidThe Satanic Temple: Don’t link us with Cruz Cory Booker is Clinton secret weapon Overnight Energy: Dems block energy spending bill for second day MORE (D-Nev.) railed against the practice of secret holds on Tuesday, suggesting the matter might be referred to the Senate Ethics Committee at some point.
Updated at 12:58 p.m.