Updated, 7:24 p.m.: As of the end of the day, McCaskill says 53 senators have signed the letter.
Sen. Claire McCaskillClaire McCaskillClinton campaign chair jabs at Trump's age Election-year politics: Senate Dems shun GOP vulnerables The Trail 2016: Miss Universe crashes campaign MORE (D-Mo.) said Wednesday she has half the Senate on board with her effort to end senators' anonymous holds on nominations.
McCaskill said she now had 50 senators who had signed the letter she has been circulating pledging to end the use of the practice, in which one senator can object, without giving his or her name, to any nominee moving forward.
McCaskill tweeted Wednesday:
Now have 50 signatures on End the Secret Hold letter.More work on it today.Rules being broken by failure of Rs to reveal who's holding noms.
McCaskill said, too, in a conference call with Missouri reporters Wednesday that she's hopeful she can win a 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority on reform.
"We've crossed the majority -- we haven't gotten to 60, yet I'm feeling confident that we will get to 60," she said.
The Missouri centrist has been leading the charge against the practice, arguing it has been used to some effect by Republicans in the minority to stall or stop President Barack ObamaBarack ObamaDonald Trump will make our economy great again Clinton proposes 'reserve' program for volunteers Trump’s law and order promises won’t make America any safer MORE's nominees.
Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidThe missed opportunity of JASTA States urged to bolster election security How the White House got rolled on the Saudi-9/11 bill MORE (D-Nev.) railed against the practice of secret holds on Tuesday, suggesting the matter might be referred to the Senate Ethics Committee at some point.
Updated at 12:58 p.m.