The liberal bloggers keep up recent criticism of the Bush administration's memo on allowing for harsher interrogations while revisiting the rationale for the Iraq War. Logan Murphy points to a recent law professor's argument that the memo is more evidence that the White House broke the law and perhaps committed an "impeachable crime." John Amato takes issue with Doug Feith's statement that going into Iraq wasn't retaliation for 9/11. He reminds readers of the way Feith, a former Pentagon official, and other Bush administration officials talked about 9/11 and Saddam Hussein together in the run-up to the invasion.