For example, there was a decline in the number of candidates in this election willing to sign special interest group pledges – which are often used to bind candidates to rigid ideological positions once they are in office. The number of lawmakers in California who signed the Americans for Tax Reform pledge to never raise taxes dropped by a full third compared to 2010.
California voters have a wider variety of choices this November. Out of the 53 Congressional districts in California, 12 will be marked by unconventional match ups in the general election. Six districts will have contests between two Democrats, two races will be between two Republicans, and four districts will have a Democrat or Republican facing an independent challenger.
This pair of innovations may give California voters, more than 25% registered as Independents or with a third party, more incentive to go to the polls, knowing that they’ll be able to choose between more than just left and right wing partisans. That point has not yet been reached, as evidenced by the low voter turnout in Tuesday's primary.
But it’s a start. California’s latest reforms show significant promise and could set the standard for increasing competition in politics in other parts of the country. States needn’t follow California's exact path, but every state should be working to build a system that allows less partisan, more solution driven, pragmatic candidates to compete in elections.
In the last few decades, California has become a visible example of dysfunctional politics in America. It’s been a depressing comedown from the trailblazer status we enjoyed for much of the 20th century. Tuesday’s primaries offer some hope that California may once again show America the way to the future.
Sragow, a veteran California political strategist and public policy analyst, is co-founder of No Labels.