

Playing politics with food stamps
Two weeks ago, the House Republican Majority passed a budget – embraced by their likely presidential nominee, Mitt Romney – that, among other things, slashes deeply into the social safety net and ends the Food Stamp program as we know it. Their budget cuts food stamp funding by at least $133.5 billion, or 17 percent, over ten years, meaning over 8 million men, women, and children could be cut from the program. It also attempts to convert our most important and successful federal anti-hunger program into a woefully inadequate block grant that would be incapable of responding to downturns in the economy or the needs of American families.
This is not the direction we should be moving in. In the words of President Harry Truman, "nothing is more important in our national life than the welfare of our children, and proper nourishment comes first in attaining this welfare." And in this economy, child poverty, child hunger, and food insecurity have all been on the rise, and middle-class and working families are working harder than ever to make ends meet. In 2010, nearly 15 percent of American households were food insecure. This means nearly 50 million Americans, including over 16 million children, face the real risk everyday of going hungry.
Some in our country, however, want to blame those that temporarily rely on food stamps for their plight. I find this wrongheaded for a number of reasons. For one, as a Catholic, I have always believed we have a moral obligation to alleviate suffering and hunger. In the words of Matthew 25:35, “For I was hungry and you gave me food.” In the deeds of Christ, who brought plenty in the midst of want with the miracle of loaves and fishes. Preventing our fellow citizens from starving and suffering the effects of malnutrition is a basic component of what good government does.
The goal, of course, is for full employment in this country at wages that allow people to feed and house themselves. Families on food stamps want that too. A week ago, I had the privilege of meeting a woman with three children in my district who lost her job at the beginning of the recent recession. She wants to work, but has so far been unable to find permanent employment, and has been in and out of the workforce over the last two years due to company lay-offs. Because her unemployment benefits take her above the income threshold for food stamps, she relies on food banks to help her feed her children – and they only eat one meal a day. The fact that this woman and her family, living on the threshold of poverty, does not even qualify for food stamps illustrates that this is not the time to slash the safety net further.
In short, Food Stamps is a critical anti-hunger program that works. It feeds millions of Americans every day, with one of the lowest error rates of any federal program. And yet, purely for ideological reasons, Republicans seek to condemn millions of children to hunger. The American people deserve better leadership from us. We have to stand up for middle-class and working families, and support the programs that make our country a humane one.
Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) serves on the House Committee on Appropriations and the Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies as the Ranking Member.








Most Viewed RSS Feed »
