The president even tacitly supported the plan, before reviewing any specifics. He told reporters: “The framework is broadly consistent with what we’ve been working on here in the White House and with the presentations I’ve made to the leadership when they’ve come over here.” That was CNN in July 2011.
What will be different? And more importantly from our perspective, what will happen with the estate tax? Perhaps it will help to have new perspectives from two additional Senators.
Senator Johanns is a former secretary of Agriculture and is on record for supporting creative solutions to the estate tax. In 2011 he voted for an amendment to create a deficit-neutral reserve fund for estate tax relief. (111th Congress S.Amdt. 873 to S.Con.Res 13). ASSET is nothing short of creative.
Senator Bennet from Colorado actually grew up in Washington and understands how this town works. He’s been an outspoken supporter of the “Pay As You Go” system. ASSET fits this niche effectively.
In 2010 Senator Bennet stated "We should also move on estate tax relief that focuses on small business owners, farmers and ranchers, to boost our economy. My plan to reform the estate tax would raise exemption levels to $5 million for single filers and $10 million for joint filers, hold the tax rate for the remaining estates at the 2009 level, and extend estate tax relief for farmers and ranchers whose kids want to keep using the family land for farming and ranching." ASSET actually provides that same relief to small business owners, farmers and ranchers.
In the end game, all our eyes will be on the House of Representatives after the election. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has a ready position to negotiate because House Republicans already passed extensions of all the Bush tax rates for a year. They also passed a bill to soften the devastating defense cuts. We need an end to the constant game of chicken and a bipartisan agreement, particularly on the estate tax.
ASSET, Americans Standing for the simplification of the estate Tax offers a revenue neutral, permanent solution to the consequences of the current estate tax collection method. It is creative and progressive, and costs the taxpayers nothing. In fact, some speculate it will save on taxpayer compliance, IRS collection, yet reap the same revenue to the government. Someone on staff at Ways & Means called it a “three headed unicorn.” We just call it bipartisan, something else that doesn’t exist.
As we hear in the tune from the Pirates of Penzance “Hail, Hail, the Gangs all here” and then retort “What the heck to we care, what the heck to do we care now?” We care. And we care now. It is time to tell our members we care right now about the outcome of any bipartisan discussion.
Smith is president of Americans Standing for the Simplification of the Estate Tax (ASSET).