By Frank Woodruff, director, National Alliance of Community Economic Development Associations (NACEDA)
At least three states: Oregon ($29 million), Florida ($334 million), and Texas ($135 million) have yet to decide what to do with all or most of their money. Most other states have either decided or sent strong signals as to their intentions.
At least 30 states will use a good portion of the funds to keep hard-working families in their homes and/or address neighborhood blight that drags down home values and local economic growth. These states are funding housing counselors and community non-profits working directly with borrowers in danger of foreclosure; supporting legal aid programs to help those in foreclosure and victims of mortgage fraud; homeless programs; or loans for refinancing. Michigan and Ohio are using substantial amounts of money for demolition of abandoned structures that have become local economic cancers. The list goes on.
The remaining ten or so states have diverted large portions, if not all, of their funds to fill budget gaps that will return next year after the settlement money is gone. Using settlement dollars in this way is foolish, unfair, and short-sighted. California received by far the single largest payment-- $410 million -- and every penny will get lost in the general fund abyss as opposed to being used to help those who were defrauded or communities that are suffering.
Other states that have decided against applying the funds as originally intended:
· Georgia, which despite being among the hardest hit, is using all of its $99 million for economic development;
· South Carolina used $10 million to give tax incentives to large corporations and put the rest of its $31 million into its general fund;
· Missouri initially made large cuts to higher education, but used all of its $40 million settlement to fill the gap;
· New Jersey used creative accounting to put their money into the general fund.
· Arizona is using half its $100 million to plug a budget hole and is being sued by local advocates and homeowners as a result.
Eight states wasted most of their funds -- Idaho (96%), Indiana (66%), Maine (64%), Mississippi (57%), Nebraska (88%), Utah (83%), Virginia (89%), and Wisconsin (82%) on other types of spending such as economic development, business incentives, and balancing state budgets.
These, however, are not tax dollars, but are purposely intended to address the foreclosure crisis and should be used to keep people in their homes and prevent additional foreclosures.
Two and a half billion dollars may seem like a lot of money, but compared to the foreclosure crisis, which affects all 50 states, it’s only a drop in the bucket. To have an impact, the funds must be targeted directly at the economy’s housing sector. Unfortunately, states that have diverted or misspent the money are diluting the nationwide effort to drive economic recovery and help homeowners regain their footing.
The banks agreed to this settlement because of the real damage they inflicted across America. It is only right that these funds be used to help the damaged parties - the families, senior citizens, and neighborhoods that have been ravaged by foreclosure.
States that do not use these funds to solve the foreclosure crisis are making a mockery of the settlement and depriving affected citizens of the help promised by the settlement.
Woodruff is the director of the National Alliance of Community Economic Development Associations (NACEDA).