Ironically, Sires’ bill – dubbed the Homeowners and Taxpayers Protection Act - will not actually protect homes or the taxpayer. Instead, it will result in even more environmentally damaging and high-risk coastal development and end up costing taxpayers. Setting up Uncle Sam to be the backstop of unstable catastrophe insurance funds is almost certain to result in more, not less, damage to peoples’ homes, because it fundamentally undercuts needed and vital efforts to mitigate, control and reduce hurricane and storm risks.
The Beach House Bailout would provide insurance at highly subsidized rates, regardless of need. Subsidizing insurance coverage not only burdens taxpayers, it incentivizes people to live in dangerous areas and discourages life-saving mitigation.
Underpriced insurance does not provide accurate information about risk, creating a subsidy to develop in risky areas — areas that also provide natural protection from storms. This development directly harms this nation’s residents and communities by eroding our natural barriers to storms and their impact.
Instead of providing a taxpayer-funded insurance scheme, Congress should pursue a national mitigation strategy to protect properties and communities so they can withstand the next storm. Mitigation saves lives, reduces damage and is cost effective. For every dollar spent on risk-reducing measures, four dollars are saved in clean up and rebuilding costs.
It is times for Congress to explore national disaster policies that concentrate on how to protect lives and property before Mother Nature strikes instead of reacting to natural disasters after the fact. Rejecting the Beach House Bailout and pursuing a national mitigation strategy instead would be a good start.
Ellis is vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense. Saks is legislative director at the National Wildlife Federation.