THE HILL
 

Bill stops interest on student loans for active duty soldiers (Sen. Arlen Specter)

By Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) - 10/19/09 08:28 AM ET

One of the defining memories of my childhood was stories of the infamous march on Washington by veterans of World War I to collect in advance their promised wartime bonus.

The Government said no, and my veteran father, who carried wounds from the Argonne Forest, watched from his home in Wichita, Kansas, as his former comrades-in-arms were cut down by federal troops on the main boulevard of the nation's capital.

The failed Bonus March left me with a lasting appreciation for the men and women who fight our nation's wars. Never should they have to await their "bonus."  Nor should they have to pay what amounts to a financial penalty in the form of interest on student loans while on active duty. 


That is why I joined 14 other senators in support of the Servicemember Student Loan Interest Relief Act that would provide immediate student loan debt relief to active-duty service soldiers and members of the National Guard.

Currently, soldiers who are serving in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries abroad are charged interest on their federal student loans. This bill would prohibit interest from accruing on direct student loans, regardless of the date of origination, for all service members on active duty for up to 60 months. This would save the average service member between $1,183 and $1,479 over the course of a 12- to 15-month activation period.

Relief from federal student loan interest during deployment is a practical and important way to honor the men and women who serve our country. This bill will help service members and their families transition from active duty by lessening this undue financial burden, especially during this tough economic climate.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/education/63641-bill-stops-interest-on-student-loans-for-active-duty-soldiers-sen-arlen-specter

Comments (3)

There is merit in this proposal, which re-establishes a benefit that all active members of the military had available during their first three years of service prior to the creation of non-subsidized federal student loans.However, in general, such arbitrary and post hoc changes to lending rules and risks impose an undue compliance cost on business. In the case of the Direct Loan program, such implementation costs will be borne by the government.When the costs of this proposal are considered, it would be good to remember how Congress imposes such unjust compliance costs upon the private sector regularly to the detriment of our nation's economic health. The proposals related to health care "reform" and faux climate change interventions come to might as related issues before the Congress today.BY Jim Woods on 10/19/2009 at 11:42
As the children say "Back in the Day" when I was in uniform, the military had programs that paid student loans off upon enlistment, up to a maximum of $40,000.00. Is this no longer in effect, or is my old memory failing me? I was going to say "Sounds good to me" until I read Jim Woods post which with arbitrary this and ad hoc that scared me into saying (as he did) there is merit in this proposal.BY Patrick Michael on 10/20/2009 at 00:14
Why is this just for deployments? This bill should allow for 60 months straight of no interest for anyone in the military. As far as the student loan repayment by the Army goes, yes they do have that up to $40,000 but it is only given to select MOSs that are in high demand. Myself, and a few of my fellow soldiers weren't offered the SLRP (student loan repayment program) because our job wasn't in high demand. That is something that needs to be available to all who enlist!BY Derek on 10/25/2009 at 11:10

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.