We both worked hard at a young age to be able to attend institutions of higher learning. While we both aspired to attend college, what we didn’t dream about was how we would ever afford it. Whether it was working long hours after school to save enough money or accessing the support network available to millions of prospective students through student loans, Pell grants and tax relief, we both found a way to make it work.
I recently received my Medicare card. Times have changed since I was 18 and headed out to college with my draft card. Ditto fifteen years ago when my AARP card arrived.
Now that I am approaching my 65th birthday, I have begun assessing my life in new and different ways. Before 65, I measured my accomplishments in dollars and cents, bricks and mortar, places I had been, people I had met and the children I'd raised. Post 65, I think I'll be making my assessment more along the lines of how I reacted to the many ah-ha days I encountered along the way.
But the debate on interest rates and who’s to blame if they double misses the bigger issue. College costs too much. There’s no brake on the incentive for states and colleges to raise tuition and fees. And students, particularly those from low and middle-income families, have to borrow too much to attend.
Washington is well into its much-anticipated discussion on immigration reform, with a proposal for a broad bill under consideration in the Senate and legislation overhauling high-skill immigration recently introduced in the House of Representatives.
Both pieces of legislation include a national fund intended to help the U.S. train more of its students in STEM fields and produce more college graduates able to meet the expected growth in high-skill jobs. The fund would be created through additional fees paid by companies seeking high-skill H-1B visas and green cards to hire foreign workers.
Two historic pieces of federal legislation, the original G.I. Bill and
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, transformed America by helping hundreds of
thousands of Americans to earn postsecondary degrees, and dramatically
expand the middle class. Now again, we are faced with demographic shifts
will transform our country and our education system. Growth in the
Hispanic/Latino population leads the way. While immigration reform and
state DREAM Acts are important ways to make sure this new majority of
Americans is fully integrated democratically and economically, in
Colorado, we are focused on raising college attainment, not simply
By 2025, the Colorado Commission on Higher Education, wants 66 percent of Coloradans aged 24-34 to hold high-quality postsecondary credentials. Our future workforce — and our commitment to equity — requires no less.
Imagine this: You are a 15 year-old standing in front of a school
vending machine, getting ready to satisfy the snack craving you've had
since first period. But lo and behold, instead of cookies and chips,
every one of the slots behind the glass contains the same healthy stuff
your mom and dad fill the cabinets with at home.
That vision could soon be a nationwide reality, thanks to updated nutrition standards from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which sets guidelines for the types of foods that are sold in our public schools. The standards are important because students consume about 400 billion calories from junk foods they buy at school every year. This is especially troubling because 33 percent of U.S. children and adolescents are on the way to becoming overweight or obese, and 25 percent of children ages five to 10 exhibit early warning signs for heart disease.
As a retired U.S. Coast Guard admiral and member of Mission: Readiness, a nonpartisan national security organization, I'm especially concerned about the impact of obesity because it’s the leading medical disqualifier for military service; one in four young Americans is now too overweight to join the military. The military recognizes this as a national security issue as our armed forces depend on individuals who are physically fit to serve.
Say what you will about the No Child Left Behind Act, but it was a piece
of legislation with a clear vision behind it. The very notion that
standardized tests could be used to assess schools – not just students –
requires a breathtaking leap of faith. To believe in using test scores
this way, one must subscribe to the viewpoint that every child possesses
the capacity to learn; that a failure to achieve is not a personal
failure but rather a systemic one.
Congress’s recent action to allow the Federal Aviation Administration to avoid furloughs of air traffic controllers is an indication that the fiscal sequester is starting to bite. Less visible, but no less real, is the harm to our economic growth that will result from drastic across-the-board sequestration cuts to agencies that support scientific research.
The raft of school shootings across the country is dramatic evidence of
the need to provide a better support system for children with mental
illness. As schools have focused more and more narrowly on academic
performance, early warning signs of mental and behavioral health
disorders have been all too frequently overlooked. The Mental Health in
Schools Act of 2013 (S. 195) has placed a spotlight on children’s mental
health, now at increasingly greater risk given cuts to state education
budgets. These cuts threaten to further reduce already limited numbers
of school counselors and other support personnel. In a time of “big
data,” we cannot ignore the fact that one in five children in the United
States suffers from mental illness. Over the past 20 years, suicide
rates have nearly doubled among children between ages 10 and 14.