THE HILL
 
comment
Print

For national security, Keystone is a dud

By Lt. Gen. Norman Seip (Ret.), U.S. Air Force - 01/18/12 06:01 PM ET

Even though President Obama said no to the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, its proponents continue to claim that allowing a Canadian company to pump its tar sands oil down the middle of our country will somehow improve national security here in the United States.
 
Don’t believe it. Here’s why.
 
Keystone XL is primarily an export pipeline. It will not bring any more new oil to our country. It will simply allow the oil industry to bypass the American energy market as it sends Canadian crude to the Gulf of Mexico, where it can be sold at higher prices to foreign buyers on the global oil market.
 
And just because this oil originates in a friendly foreign country doesn’t mean the United States will be any less dependent on oil from less-friendly countries.


Bottom line: With or without Keystone XL, we will remain dependent on oil from the Middle East. We will still be held hostage to oil-producing countries with unfriendly governments, like Iran. We will still be subject to the same high gas and oil prices set by a global marketplace, not by Canada or any other single country.
 

And in the end, we will still be forced to send our soldiers, sailors, airmen and women and marines - and billions of our tax dollars - to faraway shores in order to protect our oil interests. Our national security will still be subject to the whims of oil producing regions countries that, in a nutshell, simply despise our way of life.
 
There’s another reason why Keystone XL could hurt, not help, our national security.
 
The longer we stay focused on finding ways to keep ourselves shackled to oil and other fossil fuels, the longer we postpone our opportunity to develop new, renewable sources of energy that actually will improve our energy and national security.
 
The only way we can reduce our vulnerability to rising oil prices, volatile supplies and foreign suppliers is to reduce our dependency on oil. And the only way we can do that is to use more efficient vehicles that let us to drive further with less oil, and develop our own sources of renewable energy right here in the United States.
 
Nobody can blockade the sun that shines on solar panels in the United States. Nobody can stop the wind from blowing across our plains. And nobody can top American ingenuity to develop even more renewable energy breakthroughs in the future.
 
The U.S. military knows this very well. That’s why every branch of the military is aggressively developing sources of alternative fuels to reduce supply vulnerabilities, reduce costs, and most of all, to help keep our troops out of harm’s way in the future.
 
My own Air Force, for example, has set a goal of acquiring half of its domestic aviation fuel from alternative sources by 2016. We can now fly A-10C attack jets and supersonic F-22 Raptors using fuel blends based on an inedible weed-like plant called camelina.
 
The Navy is powering aircraft and ships with oil derived from algae and used cooking oil. The Army and the Marines are developing hybrid vehicles and powering barracks and forward operating bases with solar and wind.
 
The military’s push into renewable fuels, in turn, is driving innovation in the private sector. It has led to the establishment of made-in-America renewable energy companies from California to Montana to Louisiana and all across our land, creating real and lasting American jobs along the way.
 
The Keystone XL pipeline won’t do any of that.
 
It will simply be one more way to keep us addicted to oil, keep us vulnerable to international crises and keep our national security at risk.
 
Lt. Gen. Norman Seip (Ret.) spent 35 years in the Air Force before retiring as commander, 12th Air Force, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona. He is the owner of NS Solutions, LLC, an independent defense and energy security consulting firm, and Operation Free, a non-profit, non-partisan nation-wide organization made of up over 800 veterans from the conflicts of Iraq and Afghanistan who advocate for energy independence and security in order to keep our nation safe and strong.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-a-environment/204951-for-national-security-keystone-is-a-dud

More Videos »

Congress Blog Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.