Energy & Environment

Greed explains the disasters and the lying afterwards

As oil mucked the Gulf of Mexico and families mourned 11 dead rig workers, BP officials proclaimed that the corporation’s priority always was safety.

This tracked the tack taken by Massey Energy, whose officials also declared safety was paramount after an explosion in the corporation’s Upper Big Branch mine killed 29 workers.

Read More...

Atlantic Coast senators seek oil spill preparedness (Sen. Robert Menendez)

With some communities along the eastern seaboard concerned that the BP oil spill could reach their waters, a bipartisan group of Atlantic Coast U.S. senators wants to coordinate preparedness between their states and federal response agencies. Senator Robert Menendez and 21 of his East Coast colleagues wrote the following letter to the heads of the relevant federal agencies:

Dear Admiral Allen, Secretary Napolitano, and Secretary Locke:

As United States Senators representing coastal states along the Atlantic seaboard, we are keeping close watch on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, not only so we can help the residents of that region, but also to assess whether the oil and chemical dispersants might affect the beaches and fisheries in our home states.

Read More...

Murkowski floor statement: Congress, not EPA, should shape energy policy

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) delivered the following remarks from the Senate floor Thursday at the beginning of the debate on her EPA Disapproval Resolution. The resolution failed by a vote of 47 to 53.

"Mr. President, during the Memorial Day recess we received two pieces of alarming news that should inform the work of every member of this chamber. First we learned that the national debt has surpassed $13 trillion in total. Shortly after that, we learned that nearly all jobs added in May came from temporary Census positions. The private sector created just 41,000 jobs last month — many fewer than expected, and a far cry from a pace that will allow us to dig out from the economic recession.

Read More...

Why I'm voting 'no' on Sen. Murkowski's EPA resolution (Sen. Claire McCaskill)

While I am sympathetic to Senator Murkowski’s concerns, I plan to vote against her resolution because it would eliminate EPA’s ability to regulate emissions from vehicles. The government and the auto industry have agreed to set these new standards for vehicle emissions and it would be a mistake to jeopardize this historic agreement, which will reduce our dependence on oil by 1.8 billion barrels. 

Read More...

Momentum behind Murkowski resolution (Sen. James Inhofe)

This is the last opportunity for a lot of the Democrats voting in the Senate to vote against a massive government take-over.  Initially, when Senator Murkowski talked about doing this, I said that my only concern is – it’s unlikely you’ll reach a majority.  And if that happens, then people, like some of you in this room, will mischaracterize that as supporting a type of cap-and-trade.  That’s definitely not the case.

Read More...

Pages